Relationship between simultaneously recorded spiking activity and fluorescence signal in GCaMP6 transgenic mice

Abstract

Fluorescent calcium indicators are often used to investigate neural dynamics, but the relationship between fluorescence and action potentials (APs) remains unclear. Most APs can be detected when the soma almost fills the microscope's field of view, but calcium indicators are often used to image populations of neurons, necessitating a large field of view, generating fewer photons per neuron, and compromising AP detection. Here we characterized the AP-fluorescence transfer function in vivo for 48 layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in primary visual cortex, with simultaneous calcium imaging and cell-attached recordings from transgenic mice expressing GCaMP6s or GCaMP6f. While most APs were detected under optimal conditions, under conditions typical of population imaging studies only a minority of 1AP and 2AP events were detected (often <10% and ~20-30%, respectively), emphasizing the limits of AP detection under more realistic imaging conditions.

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed in this study are available at https://portal.brain-map.org/explore/circuits/oephys

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lawrence Huang

    Electrophysiology, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Peter Ledochowitsch

    MindScope Program, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ulf Knoblich

    Structured Science, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jérôme Lecoq

    MindScope Program, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gabe J Murphy

    Structured Science, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Clay Reid

    Structured Science, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8697-6797
  7. Saskia E J de Vries

    MindScope Program, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3704-3499
  8. Christof Koch

    MindScope Program, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hongkui Zeng

    Structured Science, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    hongkuiz@alleninstitute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0326-5878
  10. Michael A Buice

    MindScope Program, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jack Waters

    Structured Science, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    jackw@alleninstitute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2312-4183
  12. Lu Li

    Structured Science, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    lilu67@mail.sysu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Allen Institute for Brain Science (program funds)

  • Lawrence Huang
  • Peter Ledochowitsch
  • Ulf Knoblich
  • Jérôme Lecoq
  • Gabe J Murphy
  • Clay Reid
  • Saskia E J de Vries
  • Christof Koch
  • Hongkui Zeng
  • Michael A Buice
  • Jack Waters
  • Lu Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31871055)

  • Lu Li

Guangdong Science and Technology Department (2017B030314026)

  • Lu Li

This work is funded by the Allen Institute for Brain Science. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Allen Institute for Brain Science under protocol number 1509.

Copyright

© 2021, Huang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 14,459
    views
  • 2,059
    downloads
  • 130
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lawrence Huang
  2. Peter Ledochowitsch
  3. Ulf Knoblich
  4. Jérôme Lecoq
  5. Gabe J Murphy
  6. Clay Reid
  7. Saskia E J de Vries
  8. Christof Koch
  9. Hongkui Zeng
  10. Michael A Buice
  11. Jack Waters
  12. Lu Li
(2021)
Relationship between simultaneously recorded spiking activity and fluorescence signal in GCaMP6 transgenic mice
eLife 10:e51675.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51675

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51675

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (8 total) in a conditioned suppression setting, using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. The shock-paired visual cue further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an Immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.

    1. Neuroscience
    Agnieszka Glica, Katarzyna Wasilewska ... Katarzyna Jednoróg
    Research Article

    The neural noise hypothesis of dyslexia posits an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) brain activity as an underlying mechanism of reading difficulties. This study provides the first direct test of this hypothesis using both electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum measures in 120 Polish adolescents and young adults (60 with dyslexia, 60 controls) and glutamate (Glu) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 7T MRI scanner in half of the sample. Our results, supported by Bayesian statistics, show no evidence of E/I balance differences between groups, challenging the hypothesis that cortical hyperexcitability underlies dyslexia. These findings suggest that alternative mechanisms must be explored and highlight the need for further research into the E/I balance and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders.