Mature oligodendrocytes bordering lesions limit demyelination and favor myelin repair via heparan sulphate production

  1. Magali Macchi
  2. Karine Magalon
  3. Céline Zimmer
  4. Elitsa Peeva
  5. Bilal El Waly
  6. Béatrice Brousse
  7. Sarah Jaekel
  8. Kay Grobe
  9. Friedemann Kiefer
  10. Anna Williams
  11. Myriam Cayre
  12. Pascale Durbec  Is a corresponding author
  1. Aix Marseille University CNRS, France
  2. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  3. University of Muenster, Germany
  4. Max Planck Institute, Germany

Abstract

Myelin destruction is followed by resident glia activation and mobilization of endogenous progenitors (OPC) which participate in myelin repair. Here we show that in response to demyelination, mature oligodendrocytes (OLG) bordering the lesion express Ndst1, a key enzyme for heparan sulfates (HS) synthesis. Ndst1+ OLG form a belt that demarcates lesioned from intact white matter. Mice with selective inactivation of Ndst1 in the OLG lineage display increased lesion size, sustained microglia and OPC reactivity. HS production around the lesion allows Sonic hedgehog (Shh) binding and favors the local enrichment of this morphogen involved in myelin regeneration. In MS patients, Ndst1 is also found overexpressed in oligodendroglia and the number of Ndst1-expressing oligodendroglia is inversely correlated with lesion size and positively correlated with remyelination potential. Our study suggests that mature OLG surrounding demyelinated lesions are not passive witnesses but contribute to protection and regeneration by producing HS.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Magali Macchi

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Karine Magalon

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Céline Zimmer

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elitsa Peeva

    Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bilal El Waly

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2991-3754
  6. Béatrice Brousse

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sarah Jaekel

    Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kay Grobe

    Physiological Chemistry, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8385-5877
  9. Friedemann Kiefer

    Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Max Planck Institute, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Anna Williams

    Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Myriam Cayre

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Pascale Durbec

    IBDM UMR7288, Aix Marseille University CNRS, Marseille, France
    For correspondence
    pascale.durbec@univ-amu.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9660-1809

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (financial support)

  • Pascale Durbec

Aix-Marseille Université (Graduate student Fellowship and financial support)

  • Pascale Durbec

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20140329501)

  • Pascale Durbec

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France-bioimaging/PICSL infrastructure ANR-10-INSB-04-01)

  • Pascale Durbec

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE16-0014-01)

  • Pascale Durbec

AM*DEX NeuroMarseille Institute (AMX-19-IET-004)

  • Pascale Durbec

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental and surgical protocols were performed following the guidelines established by the French Ministry of Agriculture (Animal Rights Division). The architecture and functioning rules of our animal house, as well as our experimental procedures have been approved by the 'Direction Départementale des Services Vétérinaires' and the ethic committee (ID numbers F1305521 and 2016071112151400 for animal house and research project,

Human subjects: Human postmortem unfixed frozen tissues were obtained from the UK Multiple Sclerosis Tissue Bank via a UK prospective donor scheme with full ethical approval (MREC/02/2/39).

Copyright

© 2020, Macchi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,309
    views
  • 368
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Magali Macchi
  2. Karine Magalon
  3. Céline Zimmer
  4. Elitsa Peeva
  5. Bilal El Waly
  6. Béatrice Brousse
  7. Sarah Jaekel
  8. Kay Grobe
  9. Friedemann Kiefer
  10. Anna Williams
  11. Myriam Cayre
  12. Pascale Durbec
(2020)
Mature oligodendrocytes bordering lesions limit demyelination and favor myelin repair via heparan sulphate production
eLife 9:e51735.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51735

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51735

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jan H Kirchner, Lucas Euler ... Julijana Gjorgjieva
    Research Article

    Dendritic branching and synaptic organization shape single-neuron and network computations. How they emerge simultaneously during brain development as neurons become integrated into functional networks is still not mechanistically understood. Here, we propose a mechanistic model in which dendrite growth and the organization of synapses arise from the interaction of activity-independent cues from potential synaptic partners and local activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Consistent with experiments, three phases of dendritic growth – overshoot, pruning, and stabilization – emerge naturally in the model. The model generates stellate-like dendritic morphologies that capture several morphological features of biological neurons under normal and perturbed learning rules, reflecting biological variability. Model-generated dendrites have approximately optimal wiring length consistent with experimental measurements. In addition to establishing dendritic morphologies, activity-dependent plasticity rules organize synapses into spatial clusters according to the correlated activity they experience. We demonstrate that a trade-off between activity-dependent and -independent factors influences dendritic growth and synaptic location throughout development, suggesting that early developmental variability can affect mature morphology and synaptic function. Therefore, a single mechanistic model can capture dendritic growth and account for the synaptic organization of correlated inputs during development. Our work suggests concrete mechanistic components underlying the emergence of dendritic morphologies and synaptic formation and removal in function and dysfunction, and provides experimentally testable predictions for the role of individual components.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sean M Perkins, Elom A Amematsro ... Mark M Churchland
    Research Article

    Decoders for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) assume constraints on neural activity, chosen to reflect scientific beliefs while yielding tractable computations. Recent scientific advances suggest that the true constraints on neural activity, especially its geometry, may be quite different from those assumed by most decoders. We designed a decoder, MINT, to embrace statistical constraints that are potentially more appropriate. If those constraints are accurate, MINT should outperform standard methods that explicitly make different assumptions. Additionally, MINT should be competitive with expressive machine learning methods that can implicitly learn constraints from data. MINT performed well across tasks, suggesting its assumptions are well-matched to the data. MINT outperformed other interpretable methods in every comparison we made. MINT outperformed expressive machine learning methods in 37 of 42 comparisons. MINT’s computations are simple, scale favorably with increasing neuron counts, and yield interpretable quantities such as data likelihoods. MINT’s performance and simplicity suggest it may be a strong candidate for many BCI applications.