1. Immunology and Inflammation
Download icon

Yolk-sac-derived macrophages progressively expand in the mouse kidney with age

Short Report
  • Cited 3
  • Views 1,890
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e51756 doi: 10.7554/eLife.51756

Abstract

Renal macrophages represent a highly heterogeneous and specialized population of myeloid cells with mixed developmental origins from the yolk-sac and hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). They promote both injury and repair by regulating inflammation, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling. Recent reports highlight differential roles for ontogenically distinct renal macrophage populations in disease. However, little is known about how these populations change over time in normal, uninjured kidneys. Prior reports demonstrated a high proportion of HSC-derived macrophages in the young adult kidney. Unexpectedly, using genetic fate-mapping and parabiosis studies, we found that yolk-sac-derived macrophages progressively expand in number with age and become a major contributor to the renal macrophage population in older mice. This chronological shift in macrophage composition involves local cellular proliferation and recruitment from circulating progenitors and may contribute to the distinct immune responses, limited reparative capacity, and increased disease susceptibility of kidneys in the elderly population.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shintaro Ide

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yasuhito Yahara

    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yoshihiko Kobayashi

    Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sarah A Strausser

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kana Ide

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anisha Watwe

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shengjie Xu-Vanpala

    Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jamie R Privratsky

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Steven D Crowley

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mari L Shinohara

    Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Benjamin A Alman

    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Tomokazu Souma

    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    tomokazu.souma@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3285-8613

Funding

American Society of Nephrology (Career Developmental Grant)

  • Tomokazu Souma

Duke University School of Medicine (Start-up Fund)

  • Tomokazu Souma

National Institute on Aging (R01 AG049745)

  • Benjamin A Alman

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI088100)

  • Mari L Shinohara

American Heart Association (Postdoctoral fellowship)

  • Shintaro Ide

Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation (Fellowship)

  • Yasuhito Yahara

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animals were used according to the approved protocols (A051-18-02 and A196-16-0) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Duke University.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Florent Ginhoux, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore

Publication history

  1. Received: September 10, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 16, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 17, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 7, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Ide et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,890
    Page views
  • 292
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Shannon M Walsh et al.
    Tools and Resources Updated

    The detection of foreign antigens in vivo has relied on fluorescent conjugation or indirect read-outs such as antigen presentation. In our studies, we found that these widely used techniques had several technical limitations that have precluded a complete picture of antigen trafficking or retention across lymph node cell types. To address these limitations, we developed a ‘molecular tracking device’ to follow the distribution, acquisition, and retention of antigen in the lymph node. Utilizing an antigen conjugated to a nuclease-resistant DNA tag, acting as a combined antigen-adjuvant conjugate, and single-cell mRNA sequencing, we quantified antigen abundance in the lymph node. Variable antigen levels enabled the identification of caveolar endocytosis as a mechanism of antigen acquisition or retention in lymphatic endothelial cells. Thus, these molecular tracking devices enable new approaches to study dynamic tissue dissemination of antigen-adjuvant conjugates and identify new mechanisms of antigen acquisition and retention at cellular resolution in vivo.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Lydia K Lutes et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Functional tuning of T cells based on their degree of self-reactivity is established during positive selection in the thymus, although how positive selection differs for thymocytes with relatively low versus high self-reactivity is unclear. In addition, preselection thymocytes are highly sensitive to low-affinity ligands, but the mechanism underlying their enhanced T cell receptor (TCR) sensitivity is not fully understood. Here we show that murine thymocytes with low self-reactivity experience briefer TCR signals and complete positive selection more slowly than those with high self-reactivity. Additionally, we provide evidence that cells with low self-reactivity retain a preselection gene expression signature as they mature, including genes previously implicated in modulating TCR sensitivity and a novel group of ion channel genes. Our results imply that thymocytes with low self-reactivity downregulate TCR sensitivity more slowly during positive selection, and associate membrane ion channel expression with thymocyte self-reactivity and progress through positive selection.