1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Spatiotemporal patterns of neocortical activity around hippocampal sharp-wave ripples

  1. Javad Karimi Abadchi
  2. Mojtaba Nazari-Ahangarkolaee
  3. Sandra Gattas
  4. Edgar Bermudez-Contreras
  5. Artur Luczak
  6. Bruce L McNaughton  Is a corresponding author
  7. Majid H Mohajerani  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Lethbridge, Canada
  2. University of California, Irvine, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 6
  • Views 4,240
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e51972 doi: 10.7554/eLife.51972

Abstract

A prevalent model is that sharp-wave ripples (SWR) arise 'spontaneously' in CA3 and propagate recent memory traces outward to the neocortex to facilitate memory consolidation there. Using voltage and extracellular glutamate transient recording over widespread regions of mice dorsal neocortex in relation to CA1 multiunit activity (MUA) and SWR, we find that the largest SWR-related modulation occurs in retrosplenial cortex; however, contrary to the unidirectional hypothesis, neocortical activation exhibited a continuum of activation timings relative to SWRs, varying from leading to lagging. Thus, contrary to the model in which SWRs arise 'spontaneously' in the hippocampus, neocortical activation often precedes SWRs and may thus constitute a trigger event in which neocortical information seeds associative reactivation of hippocampal 'indices'. This timing continuum is consistent with a dynamics in which older, more consolidated memories may in fact initiate the hippocampal-neocortical dialog, whereas reactivation of newer memories may be initiated predominantly in the hippocampus.

Data availability

All data analyzed and used to produce the main findings of this study have been deposited on Dryad. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 5, and 7.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Javad Karimi Abadchi

    Canadian Centre for Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mojtaba Nazari-Ahangarkolaee

    Canadian Centre for Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sandra Gattas

    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Edgar Bermudez-Contreras

    Canadian Centre for Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4937-1780
  5. Artur Luczak

    Canadian Center for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Bruce L McNaughton

    Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    For correspondence
    bruce.mcnaughton@uleth.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Majid H Mohajerani

    Canadian Centre for Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    For correspondence
    mohajerani@uleth.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0964-2977

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (40352)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (1631465)

  • Bruce L McNaughton

Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (390930)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (156040)

  • Bruce L McNaughton

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011-18-2-0021)

  • Bruce L McNaughton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The animal housing, handling, and surgery protocols (#1812) were approved by the University of Lethbridge Animal Care Committee and were in accordance with guidelines set forth by the Canadian Council for Animal Care.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sachin Deshmukh, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India

Publication history

  1. Received: September 18, 2019
  2. Accepted: March 11, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 13, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 25, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: March 27, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Karimi Abadchi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,240
    Page views
  • 661
    Downloads
  • 6
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katalin Skrapits et al.
    Research Article

    Human reproduction is controlled by ~2,000 hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons. Here we report the discovery and characterization of additional ~150,000-200,000 GnRH-synthesizing cells in the human basal ganglia and basal forebrain. Nearly all extrahypothalamic GnRH neurons expressed the cholinergic marker enzyme choline acetyltransferase. Similarly, hypothalamic GnRH neurons were also cholinergic both in embryonic and adult human brains. Whole-transcriptome analysis of cholinergic interneurons and medium spiny projection neurons laser-microdissected from the human putamen showed selective expression of GNRH1 and GNRHR1 autoreceptors in the cholinergic cell population and uncovered the detailed transcriptome profile and molecular connectome of these two cell types. Higher-order non-reproductive functions regulated by GnRH under physiological conditions in the human basal ganglia and basal forebrain require clarification. The role and changes of GnRH/GnRHR1 signaling in neurodegenerative disorders affecting cholinergic neurocircuitries, including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, need to be explored.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hanna Keren et al.
    Research Article

    Humans refer to their mood state regularly in day-to-day as well as clinical interactions. Theoretical accounts suggest that when reporting on our mood we integrate over the history of our experiences; yet, the temporal structure of this integration remains unexamined. Here we use a computational approach to quantitatively answer this question and show that early events exert a stronger influence on reported mood compared to recent events. We show that a Primacy model accounts better for mood reports compared to a range of alternative temporal representations across random, consistent or dynamic reward environments, different age groups and in both healthy and depressed participants. Moreover, we find evidence for neural encoding of the Primacy, but not the Recency, model in frontal brain regions related to mood regulation. These findings hold implications for the timing of events in experimental or clinical settings and suggest new directions for individualized mood interventions.