Paradoxical network excitation by glutamate release from VGluT3+ GABAergic interneurons

  1. Kenneth A Pelkey  Is a corresponding author
  2. Daniela Calvigioni
  3. Calvin Fang
  4. Geoffrey Vargish
  5. Tyler Ekins
  6. Kurt Auville
  7. Jason C Wester
  8. Mandy Lai
  9. Connie Mackenzie-Gray Scott
  10. Xiaoqing Yuan
  11. Steven Hunt
  12. Daniel Abebe
  13. Qing Xu
  14. Jordane Dimidschstein
  15. Gordon Fishell
  16. Ramesh Chittajallu
  17. Chris J McBain  Is a corresponding author
  1. NICHD/NIH, United States
  2. New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  3. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, United States
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

In violation of Dale's principle several neuronal subtypes utilize more than one classical neurotransmitter. Molecular identification of vesicular glutamate transporter 3 and cholecystokinin expressing cortical interneurons (CCK+VGluT3+INTs) has prompted speculation of GABA/glutamate corelease from these cells for almost two decades despite a lack of direct evidence. We unequivocally demonstrate CCK+VGluT3+INT mediated GABA/glutamate cotransmission onto principal cells in adult mice using paired recording and optogenetic approaches. Although under normal conditions, GABAergic inhibition dominates CCK+VGluT3+INT signaling, glutamatergic signaling becomes predominant when glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) function is compromised. CCK+VGluT3+INTs exhibit surprising anatomical diversity comprising subsets of all known dendrite targeting CCK+ interneurons in addition to the expected basket cells, and their extensive circuit innervation profoundly dampens circuit excitability under normal conditions. However, in contexts where the glutamatergic phenotype of CCK+VGluT3+INTs is amplified, they promote paradoxical network hyperexcitability which may be relevant to disorders involving GAD dysfunction such as schizophrenia or vitamin B6 deficiency.

Data availability

All data analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript/supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kenneth A Pelkey

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    pelkeyk2@mail.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9731-1336
  2. Daniela Calvigioni

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Calvin Fang

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Geoffrey Vargish

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tyler Ekins

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kurt Auville

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jason C Wester

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mandy Lai

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Connie Mackenzie-Gray Scott

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xiaoqing Yuan

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Steven Hunt

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Daniel Abebe

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Qing Xu

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jordane Dimidschstein

    Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Gordon Fishell

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Ramesh Chittajallu

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Chris J McBain

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    mcbainc@mail.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5909-0157

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Intramural research program)

  • Chris J McBain

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS081297; NS074972)

  • Gordon Fishell

National Institute of Mental Health (MH071679)

  • Gordon Fishell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with animal protocols approved by the National Institutes of Health (ASP# 17-045).

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,966
    views
  • 635
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kenneth A Pelkey
  2. Daniela Calvigioni
  3. Calvin Fang
  4. Geoffrey Vargish
  5. Tyler Ekins
  6. Kurt Auville
  7. Jason C Wester
  8. Mandy Lai
  9. Connie Mackenzie-Gray Scott
  10. Xiaoqing Yuan
  11. Steven Hunt
  12. Daniel Abebe
  13. Qing Xu
  14. Jordane Dimidschstein
  15. Gordon Fishell
  16. Ramesh Chittajallu
  17. Chris J McBain
(2020)
Paradoxical network excitation by glutamate release from VGluT3+ GABAergic interneurons
eLife 9:e51996.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51996

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51996

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Diellor Basha, Amirmohammad Azarmehri ... Igor Timofeev
    Research Article

    Memory consolidation during sleep depends on the interregional coupling of slow waves, spindles, and sharp wave-ripples (SWRs), across the cortex, thalamus, and hippocampus. The reuniens nucleus of the thalamus, linking the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the hippocampus, may facilitate interregional coupling during sleep. To test this hypothesis, we used intracellular, extracellular unit and local field potential recordings in anesthetized and head restrained non-anesthetized cats as well as computational modelling. Electrical stimulation of the reuniens evoked both antidromic and orthodromic intracellular mPFC responses, consistent with bidirectional functional connectivity between mPFC, reuniens and hippocampus in anesthetized state. The major finding obtained from behaving animals is that at least during NREM sleep hippocampo-reuniens-mPFC form a functional loop. SWRs facilitate the triggering of thalamic spindles, which later reach neocortex. In return, transition to mPFC UP states increase the probability of hippocampal SWRs and later modulate spindle amplitude. During REM sleep hippocampal theta activity provides periodic locking of reuniens neuronal firing and strong crosscorrelation at LFP level, but the values of reuniens-mPFC crosscorrelation was relatively low and theta power at mPFC was low. The neural mass model of this network demonstrates that the strength of bidirectional hippocampo-thalamic connections determines the coupling of oscillations, suggesting a mechanistic link between synaptic weights and the propensity for interregional synchrony. Our results demonstrate the presence of functional connectivity in hippocampo-thalamo-cortical network, but the efficacy of this connectivity is modulated by behavioral state.

    1. Neuroscience
    Maxine K Loh, Samantha J Hurh ... Mitchell F Roitman
    Research Article

    Mesolimbic dopamine encoding of non-contingent rewards and reward-predictive cues has been well established. Considerable debate remains over how mesolimbic dopamine responds to aversion and in the context of aversive conditioning. Inconsistencies may arise from the use of aversive stimuli that are transduced along different neural paths relative to reward or the conflation of responses to avoidance and aversion. Here, we made intraoral infusions of sucrose and measured how dopamine and behavioral responses varied to the changing valence of sucrose. Pairing intraoral sucrose with malaise via injection of lithium chloride (LiCl) caused the development of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA), which rendered the typically rewarding taste of sucrose aversive upon subsequent re-exposure. Following CTA formation, intraoral sucrose suppressed the activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons (VTADA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine release. This pattern of dopamine signaling after CTA is similar to intraoral infusions of innately aversive quinine and contrasts with responses to sucrose when it was novel or not paired with LiCl. Dopamine responses were negatively correlated with behavioral reactivity to intraoral sucrose and predicted home cage sucrose preference. Further, dopamine responses scaled with the strength of the CTA, which was increased by repeated LiCl pairings and weakened through extinction. Thus, the findings demonstrate differential dopamine encoding of the same taste stimulus according to its valence, which is aligned to distinct behavioral responses.