Paradoxical network excitation by glutamate release from VGluT3+ GABAergic interneurons

  1. Kenneth A Pelkey  Is a corresponding author
  2. Daniela Calvigioni
  3. Calvin Fang
  4. Geoffrey Vargish
  5. Tyler Ekins
  6. Kurt Auville
  7. Jason C Wester
  8. Mandy Lai
  9. Connie Mackenzie-Gray Scott
  10. Xiaoqing Yuan
  11. Steven Hunt
  12. Daniel Abebe
  13. Qing Xu
  14. Jordane Dimidschstein
  15. Gordon Fishell
  16. Ramesh Chittajallu
  17. Chris J McBain  Is a corresponding author
  1. NICHD/NIH, United States
  2. New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  3. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, United States
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

In violation of Dale's principle several neuronal subtypes utilize more than one classical neurotransmitter. Molecular identification of vesicular glutamate transporter 3 and cholecystokinin expressing cortical interneurons (CCK+VGluT3+INTs) has prompted speculation of GABA/glutamate corelease from these cells for almost two decades despite a lack of direct evidence. We unequivocally demonstrate CCK+VGluT3+INT mediated GABA/glutamate cotransmission onto principal cells in adult mice using paired recording and optogenetic approaches. Although under normal conditions, GABAergic inhibition dominates CCK+VGluT3+INT signaling, glutamatergic signaling becomes predominant when glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) function is compromised. CCK+VGluT3+INTs exhibit surprising anatomical diversity comprising subsets of all known dendrite targeting CCK+ interneurons in addition to the expected basket cells, and their extensive circuit innervation profoundly dampens circuit excitability under normal conditions. However, in contexts where the glutamatergic phenotype of CCK+VGluT3+INTs is amplified, they promote paradoxical network hyperexcitability which may be relevant to disorders involving GAD dysfunction such as schizophrenia or vitamin B6 deficiency.

Data availability

All data analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript/supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kenneth A Pelkey

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    pelkeyk2@mail.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9731-1336
  2. Daniela Calvigioni

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Calvin Fang

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Geoffrey Vargish

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tyler Ekins

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kurt Auville

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jason C Wester

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mandy Lai

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Connie Mackenzie-Gray Scott

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xiaoqing Yuan

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Steven Hunt

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Daniel Abebe

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Qing Xu

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jordane Dimidschstein

    Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Gordon Fishell

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Ramesh Chittajallu

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Chris J McBain

    Section on Cellular and Synaptic Physiology, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    mcbainc@mail.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5909-0157

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Intramural research program)

  • Chris J McBain

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS081297; NS074972)

  • Gordon Fishell

National Institute of Mental Health (MH071679)

  • Gordon Fishell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marlene Bartos, University of Freiburg, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with animal protocols approved by the National Institutes of Health (ASP# 17-045).

Version history

  1. Received: September 19, 2019
  2. Accepted: February 12, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 13, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 24, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,780
    views
  • 619
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kenneth A Pelkey
  2. Daniela Calvigioni
  3. Calvin Fang
  4. Geoffrey Vargish
  5. Tyler Ekins
  6. Kurt Auville
  7. Jason C Wester
  8. Mandy Lai
  9. Connie Mackenzie-Gray Scott
  10. Xiaoqing Yuan
  11. Steven Hunt
  12. Daniel Abebe
  13. Qing Xu
  14. Jordane Dimidschstein
  15. Gordon Fishell
  16. Ramesh Chittajallu
  17. Chris J McBain
(2020)
Paradoxical network excitation by glutamate release from VGluT3+ GABAergic interneurons
eLife 9:e51996.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51996

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51996

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Elissavet Chartampila, Karim S Elayouby ... Helen E Scharfman
    Research Article

    Maternal choline supplementation (MCS) improves cognition in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) models. However, the effects of MCS on neuronal hyperexcitability in AD are unknown. We investigated the effects of MCS in a well-established mouse model of AD with hyperexcitability, the Tg2576 mouse. The most common type of hyperexcitability in Tg2576 mice are generalized EEG spikes (interictal spikes [IIS]). IIS also are common in other mouse models and occur in AD patients. In mouse models, hyperexcitability is also reflected by elevated expression of the transcription factor ∆FosB in the granule cells (GCs) of the dentate gyrus (DG), which are the principal cell type. Therefore, we studied ΔFosB expression in GCs. We also studied the neuronal marker NeuN within hilar neurons of the DG because reduced NeuN protein expression is a sign of oxidative stress or other pathology. This is potentially important because hilar neurons regulate GC excitability. Tg2576 breeding pairs received a diet with a relatively low, intermediate, or high concentration of choline. After weaning, all mice received the intermediate diet. In offspring of mice fed the high choline diet, IIS frequency declined, GC ∆FosB expression was reduced, and hilar NeuN expression was restored. Using the novel object location task, spatial memory improved. In contrast, offspring exposed to the relatively low choline diet had several adverse effects, such as increased mortality. They had the weakest hilar NeuN immunoreactivity and greatest GC ΔFosB protein expression. However, their IIS frequency was low, which was surprising. The results provide new evidence that a diet high in choline in early life can improve outcomes in a mouse model of AD, and relatively low choline can have mixed effects. This is the first study showing that dietary choline can regulate hyperexcitability, hilar neurons, ΔFosB, and spatial memory in an animal model of AD.

    1. Neuroscience
    Guozheng Feng, Yiwen Wang ... Ni Shu
    Research Article

    Brain structural circuitry shapes a richly patterned functional synchronization, supporting for complex cognitive and behavioural abilities. However, how coupling of structural connectome (SC) and functional connectome (FC) develops and its relationships with cognitive functions and transcriptomic architecture remain unclear. We used multimodal magnetic resonance imaging data from 439 participants aged 5.7–21.9 years to predict functional connectivity by incorporating intracortical and extracortical structural connectivity, characterizing SC–FC coupling. Our findings revealed that SC–FC coupling was strongest in the visual and somatomotor networks, consistent with evolutionary expansion, myelin content, and functional principal gradient. As development progressed, SC–FC coupling exhibited heterogeneous alterations dominated by an increase in cortical regions, broadly distributed across the somatomotor, frontoparietal, dorsal attention, and default mode networks. Moreover, we discovered that SC–FC coupling significantly predicted individual variability in general intelligence, mainly influencing frontoparietal and default mode networks. Finally, our results demonstrated that the heterogeneous development of SC–FC coupling is positively associated with genes in oligodendrocyte-related pathways and negatively associated with astrocyte-related genes. This study offers insight into the maturational principles of SC–FC coupling in typical development.