Whole brain delivery of an instability-prone Mecp2 transgene improves behavioral and molecular pathological defects in mouse models of Rett syndrome

  1. Mirko Luoni
  2. Serena Giannelli
  3. Marzia Tina Indrigo
  4. Antonio Niro
  5. Luca Massimino
  6. Angelo Iannielli
  7. Laura Passeri
  8. Fabio Russo
  9. Giuseppe Morabito
  10. Piera Calamita
  11. Silvia Gregori
  12. Benjamin Deverman
  13. Vania Broccoli  Is a corresponding author
  1. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy
  2. National Institute of Molecular Genetics, Italy
  3. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at Broad Institute, United States

Abstract

Rett syndrome is an incurable neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding for methyl-CpG binding-protein 2 (MeCP2). Gene therapy for this disease presents inherent hurdles since MECP2 is expressed throughout the brain and its duplication leads to severe neurological conditions as well. Herein, we use the AAV-PHP.eB to deliver an instability-prone Mecp2 (iMecp2) transgene cassette which, increasing RNA destabilization and inefficient protein translation of the viral Mecp2 transgene, limits supraphysiological Mecp2 protein levels. Intravenous injections of the PHP.eB-iMecp2 virus in symptomatic Mecp2 mutant mice significantly improved locomotor activity, lifespan and gene expression normalization. Remarkably, PHP.eB-iMecp2 administration was well tolerated in female Mecp2 mutant or in wild-type animals. In contrast, we observed a strong immune response to the transgene in treated male Mecp2 mutant mice that was overcome by immunosuppression. Overall, PHP.eB-mediated delivery of iMecp2 provided widespread and efficient gene transfer maintaining physiological Mecp2 protein levels in the brain.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE125155.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mirko Luoni

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Serena Giannelli

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marzia Tina Indrigo

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Antonio Niro

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Luca Massimino

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Angelo Iannielli

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Laura Passeri

    Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fabio Russo

    Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Giuseppe Morabito

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Mialno, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Piera Calamita

    National Institute of Molecular Genetics, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9029-9346
  11. Silvia Gregori

    Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Benjamin Deverman

    Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6223-9303
  13. Vania Broccoli

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    broccoli.vania@hsr.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4050-0926

Funding

Fondazione Telethon (GGP19038)

  • Mirko Luoni

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sonia Garel, Ecole Normale Superieure, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed according to protocols approved by the internal IACUC and reported to the Italian Ministry of Health according to the European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU.

Version history

  1. Received: October 10, 2019
  2. Accepted: March 23, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 24, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 2, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Luoni et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,447
    views
  • 704
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mirko Luoni
  2. Serena Giannelli
  3. Marzia Tina Indrigo
  4. Antonio Niro
  5. Luca Massimino
  6. Angelo Iannielli
  7. Laura Passeri
  8. Fabio Russo
  9. Giuseppe Morabito
  10. Piera Calamita
  11. Silvia Gregori
  12. Benjamin Deverman
  13. Vania Broccoli
(2020)
Whole brain delivery of an instability-prone Mecp2 transgene improves behavioral and molecular pathological defects in mouse models of Rett syndrome
eLife 9:e52629.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52629

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52629

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Michael Berger, Michèle Fraatz ... Henrike Scholz
    Research Article

    The brain regulates food intake in response to internal energy demands and food availability. However, can internal energy storage influence the type of memory that is formed? We show that the duration of starvation determines whether Drosophila melanogaster forms appetitive short-term or longer-lasting intermediate memories. The internal glycogen storage in the muscles and adipose tissue influences how intensely sucrose-associated information is stored. Insulin-like signaling in octopaminergic reward neurons integrates internal energy storage into memory formation. Octopamine, in turn, suppresses the formation of long-term memory. Octopamine is not required for short-term memory because octopamine-deficient mutants can form appetitive short-term memory for sucrose and to other nutrients depending on the internal energy status. The reduced positive reinforcing effect of sucrose at high internal glycogen levels, combined with the increased stability of food-related memories due to prolonged periods of starvation, could lead to increased food intake.