Kainate-type of glutamate receptors regulate development of glutamatergic synaptic circuitry in the rodent amygdala

Abstract

Perturbed information processing in the amygdala has been implicated in developmentally originating neuropsychiatric disorders. However, little is known on the mechanisms that guide formation and refinement of intrinsic connections between amygdaloid nuclei. We demonstrate that in rodents the glutamatergic connection from basolateral to central amygdala (BLA-CeA) develops rapidly during the first ten postnatal days, before external inputs underlying amygdala dependent behaviors emerge. During this restricted period of synaptic development, kainate-type of ionotropic glutamate receptors (KARs) are highly expressed in the BLA and tonically activated to regulate glutamate release via a G-protein dependent mechanism. Genetic manipulation of this endogenous KAR activity locally in the newborn LA perturbed development of glutamatergic input to CeA, identifying KARs as a physiological mechanism regulating formation of the glutamatergic circuitry in the amygdala.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all Figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria Ryazantseva

    Research Programme in Molecular and Integrative Biosciences and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jonas Englund

    Research Programme in Molecular and Integrative Biosciences and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexandra Shintyapina

    Research Programme in Molecular and Integrative Biosciences and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Johanna Huupponen

    Research Programme in Molecular and Integrative Biosciences and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vasilii Shteinikov

    Research Programme in Molecular and Integrative Biosciences and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Asla Pitkänen

    A I Virtanen Institute, Department of Neurobiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Juha Partanen

    Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sari E Lauri

    Research Programme in Molecular and Integrative Biosciences and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    For correspondence
    sari.lauri@helsinki.fi
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5895-1357

Funding

Academy of Finland (SA 297211)

  • Sari E Lauri

Aatos Erkko Foundation

  • Sari E Lauri

Sigrid Juselius Foundation

  • Sari E Lauri

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were done in accordance with the guidelines given by the ethics committee for animal research at the University of Helsinki (license numbers ESAVI/6853/04.10.07/2017 and ESAVI/29384/2019).

Reviewing Editor

  1. John Huguenard, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 16, 2019
  2. Accepted: March 22, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 2, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Ryazantseva et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,603
    Page views
  • 210
    Downloads
  • 12
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maria Ryazantseva
  2. Jonas Englund
  3. Alexandra Shintyapina
  4. Johanna Huupponen
  5. Vasilii Shteinikov
  6. Asla Pitkänen
  7. Juha Partanen
  8. Sari E Lauri
(2020)
Kainate-type of glutamate receptors regulate development of glutamatergic synaptic circuitry in the rodent amygdala
eLife 9:e52798.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52798

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jing Wang, Hamid Azimi ... Gregor Rainer
    Research Article

    The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), a retinotopic relay center where visual inputs from the retina are processed and relayed to the visual cortex, has been proposed as a potential target for artificial vision. At present, it is unknown whether optogenetic LGN stimulation is sufficient to elicit behaviorally relevant percepts, and the properties of LGN neural responses relevant for artificial vision have not been thoroughly characterized. Here, we demonstrate that tree shrews pretrained on a visual detection task can detect optogenetic LGN activation using an AAV2-CamKIIα-ChR2 construct and readily generalize from visual to optogenetic detection. Simultaneous recordings of LGN spiking activity and primary visual cortex (V1) local field potentials (LFP) during optogenetic LGN stimulation show that LGN neurons reliably follow optogenetic stimulation at frequencies up to 60 Hz, and uncovered a striking phase locking between the V1 local field potential (LFP) and the evoked spiking activity in LGN. These phase relationships were maintained over a broad range of LGN stimulation frequencies, up to 80 Hz, with spike field coherence values favoring higher frequencies, indicating the ability to relay temporally precise information to V1 using light activation of the LGN. Finally, V1 LFP responses showed sensitivity values to LGN optogenetic activation that were similar to the animal's behavioral performance. Taken together, our findings confirm the LGN as a potential target for visual prosthetics in a highly visual mammal closely related to primates.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yuk-Hoi Yiu, Christian Leibold
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cell sequences have been hypothesized to serve as diverse purposes as the induction of synaptic plasticity, formation and consolidation of long-term memories, or navigation and planning. During spatial behaviors of rodents, sequential firing of place cells at the theta timescale (known as theta sequences) encodes running trajectories, which can be considered as one-dimensional behavioral sequences of traversed locations. In a two-dimensional space, however, each single location can be visited along arbitrary one-dimensional running trajectories. Thus, a place cell will generally take part in multiple different theta sequences, raising questions about how this two-dimensional topology can be reconciled with the idea of hippocampal sequences underlying memory of (one-dimensional) episodes. Here, we propose a computational model of cornu ammonis 3 (CA3) and dentate gyrus (DG), where sensorimotor input drives the direction-dependent (extrinsic) theta sequences within CA3 reflecting the two-dimensional spatial topology, whereas the intrahippocampal CA3-DG projections concurrently produce intrinsic sequences that are independent of the specific running trajectory. Consistent with experimental data, intrinsic theta sequences are less prominent, but can nevertheless be detected during theta activity, thereby serving as running-direction independent landmark cues. We hypothesize that the intrinsic sequences largely reflect replay and preplay activity during non-theta states.