Three arms of a randomized, double-blind Phase 1 trial of PfSPZ Vaccine were selected for antibody profiling on Pf whole proteome microarrays: normal saline controls, a lower dose (group 2, 1.35 × …
The heatmap of the normalized signal intensities of each sample per subject is shown in (a), with the signal intensity of each protein or fragment (rows) displayed for the samples before and after …
Data frame of the normalized signal intensities of the protein microarray.
This table includes log2 signal intensities of each of the 7’455 protein spots for all samples. Serum draw, immunization dose, protection after CHMI, and description of each protein fragment are specified.
Breadth of Pf-specific antibody responses per volunteer (a) before and (b) after PfSPZ vaccination, stratified according to intervention and ordered according to their respective number of …
Breadth of Pf-specific humoral immunity in each sample.
Summary statitistics on breadth per group and protection level.
An estimated effect of immunization on breadth and corresponding p-value performing the inverted beta-binomial test for paired count data using sample at basdeline and after immunization are shown in A, together with the mean and median breadth for each group at baseline and after immunization, and for the protected and unprotected group. (B) indicates the estimated regression coefficient and corresponding p values of the negative binomial regression to test differences in breadth between two groups at either baseline or after immunization.
The three volcano plots in the upper row show (a) the mean fold change in the control group (n = 8), (b) in group 2 (1.35 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine/dose) (n = 18), and (c) in group 3 (2.7 × 105 PfSPZ …
Source data for plot a.
Source data for plot b.
Source data for plot c.
Upper row: The three volcano plots in the upper row show (a) the mean fold change in the control group (n = 8), (b) in group 2 (n = 18), and (c) in group 3 (n = 20). In all groups, the samples …
The three volcano plots illustrate (a) the mean fold change of the differential antigen reactivity before and 2 weeks after immunization between controls (n = 8) and group 2 (n = 18), (b) between …
Source data for plot a.
Source data for plot b.
Source data for plot c.
Mean (x-axis) and variance (y-axis) of the normalized log2 signal intensities of each of the 2804 reactive antigens across (a) all samples at baseline (n = 46), (b) samples 2 weeks after …
The mean fold change between antigen reactivity in the protected (n = 5) and the non-protected (n = 33) individuals from groups 2 and 3 are represented in volcano plots (a) for baseline and (b) …
Source data for plot a.
Source data for plot b.
Source data for plot c.
The volcano plot in (a) shows the mean fold change in the protected group (n = 5) compared to the unprotected group (n = 33) two weeks past last vaccination were compared. The dashed line represents …
The volcano plot shows the mean fold change of the differential antigen reactivity before and 2 weeks after immunization between the protected group (n = 5) and unprotected group (n = 33). The …
Source data for plot.
PfEMP1 sequence named NF54_SpzPfEMP1 or PF3D7_0809100 (Zanghì et al., 2018) is compared to the sequences of the three PfEMP1 protein fragments found to be associated with protection in this study …
(a) Breadth counts of all PfSPZ vaccinees grouped by protection status following CHMI, with protected group in green and non-protected volunteers depicted in white, before and after immunization. …
The number of antigens that were reactive in at least 80% of the individual in each group are represented for (a) baseline for the protected group (green, n = 5) and the unprotected group (grey, n = …
Table of commonly recognized antigens .
List of the antigens that increased in reactivity following immunization, or that were reactive after immunization in at least 50% (highlighted in blue) of a given group are listed, including the ID, gene ID, Description, and the number of volunteers for which the antigen was reactive or had increased reactivity following immunization.
The frequencies of reactive antigens allocated into the different subcellular localization categories (rows) for each group (columns), tested using 2-propotions Z-test and p-values adjusted using …
Subcellular localization | N reactive proteins | Baseline reactivity | Post-Immz reactivity | Baseline reactivity (protected) | Post-Immz reactivity (protected) | Baseline reactivity (unprotected) | Post-Immz reactivity (unprotected) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extracellular | 53 | 3 (6%) | 3 (6%) | 10 (19%) | 12 (23%) | 3 (6%) | 3 (6%) | |
Cell membrane | 208 | 11 (5%) | 8 (4%) | 63 (30%) | 70 (34%) | 10 (5%) | 5 (2%) | |
Intracellular (N = 1978) | Cytoplasm | 661 | 14 (2%) | 16 (2%) | 73 (11%) | 79 (12%) | 12 (2%) | 14 (2%) |
Endoplasmic reticulum | 429 | 12 (3%) | 11 (3%) | 53 (12%) | 60 (14%) | 11 (3%) | 10 (2%) | |
Golgi apparatus | 76 | 2 (3%) | 2 (3%) | 13 (17%) | 15 (20%) | 2 (3%) | 2 (3%) | |
Lysosome/Vacuole | 32 | 1 (3%) | 1 (3%) | 3 (9%) | 2 (6%) | 1 (3%) | 1 (3%) | |
Mitochondrion | 150 | 3 (2%) | 3 (2%) | 11 (7%) | 14 (9%) | 3 (2%) | 3 (2%) | |
Nucleus | 624 | 24 (4%) | 20 (3%) | 107 (17%) | 115 (18%) | 17 (3%) | 18 (3%) | |
Peroxisome | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Plastid | 3 | 2 (67%) | 2 (67%) | 2 (67%) | 2 (67%) | 2 (67%) | 2 (67%) | |
Total | 2239 | 72 (3%) | 66 (3%) | 335 (15%) | 369 (16%) | 61 (3%) | 58 (3%) |
The full list of reactive antigens and DeepLoc subcellular localization predictions.
Gene Ontology prediction for the molecular function of the Pf genes.
Gene Ontology prediction for the cellular component of the Pf genes.
Gene Ontology prediction for the biological process of the Pf genes.
Pfam database for the prediction of protein families.
Gene and protein families present in the protected versus non protected groups.
This table lists Pfam protein family prediction (El-Gebali et al., 2019), and gene ontology prediction available on Plasmodb.org (Huntley et al., 2015) and identified protein characteristics and distinct functional categories which were identified as being reactive in at least 80% of the protected or non protected group before and after immunization. Reactive proteins were associated to each group using the Fisher’s exact test, and p value correct using the Benjamini-Hochberg method (BH) (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Pfam and GO description were found in https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/ and https://biocyc.org/ and https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/ and https://biocyc.org/, respectively. See also Source datas 1–4.