(a–b) Experimental design (see Materials and methods for details). (c–f) Volume rendered, high magnification images showing enhanced eTeNT.EGFP putative fibers (green) surrounding NeuN-stained …
(a–i) Intrasegmental distribution profile of LAPNs. Scatter plot of (a) ipsilateral (n = 1,069) and (b) commissural-projecting LAPNs (n = 1,379) at spinal L1 with overlaid contour map (N = 11 …
contains the source data for CTB labeled cell body counts.
(a–c) Representative swing-stance graphs of stepping behaviors observed at control time points. Left: orange = homolateral HL-FL movements (out-of-phase, 0.5), blue = diagonal HL-FL movements …
Contains the source data for step ratio measures.
Contains the source data for the magnitude of change of step ratio measures.
Contains the source data for the interlimb coordination measures.
(a–d) Individual time point comparisons for silencing-induced changes in interlimb coordination. Time points: BL = Baseline, PD1 = Pre-Dox1, D1D3 = Dox1 On-Day 3, D1D5 = Dox1 On-Day 5, D1D8 = Dox1 On…
(a) Three-segment (iliac crest-hip, hip-ankle, ankle-toe), two-angle model of intralimb coordination. Five phases of step cycle illustrated with corresponding hindlimb range-of-motion …
Contains the source data for trunk angle measures.
Contains the source data for intralimb range-of-motion.
Contains the source data for intralimb coordination measures.
Contains the source data for foot faults on the narrow beam.
Contains the source data for hindlimb base-of-support.
(a) Schematic illustrating the speed-dependent gaits with representative swing-stance graphs (purple = walk trot; blue = gallop; green = half-bound; yellow = full-bound). (b) Schematic illustrating …
Contains the source data for stereotypical gait measures.
Contains the source data for phase/frequency relationship.
Contains the source data for spatiotemporal relationship.
(a) Schematic illustrating custom-built long tank to analyze volitionally-expressed locomotor gaits (see methods for details). (b–e) Schematics and representative swing-stance graphs illustrating …
(a–l) The fundamental relationship between speed and various speed-dependent spatiotemporal features of locomotion remained intact during silencing-induced changes to hindlimb-forelimb coordination …
Contains the source data for FL-HL spatiotemporal measures.
(a) Silencing LAPNs does not affect the underlying stride duration of the forelimbs (p>0.05; repeated measures ANOVA with speed as a co-variate followed by Sidák post hoc t-tests where appropriate) …
(a) Intra-girdle left-right coordination was affected to a greater extent during overground stepping as compared to treadmill during long ascending propriospinal neuron (LAPN) silencing (forelimbs, …
Contains the source data for phase during exploratory walking.
Contains the source data for phase during treadmill walking.
Contains the source data for phase on different surfaces.
Contains the source data for phase during swimming.
Left-right forelimb (a,d,g,j,m), left-right hindlimb (b,e,h,k,n,p), and diagonal hindlimb-forelimb coordination (c,f,i,l,o) were assessed across the various behavioral contexts. Left-right forelimb …
Hindlimb stride time vs speed (a–j), stride frequency vs speed (k–t), and stride length vs speed (u–dd) relationships observed at Control and DoxOn long ascending propriospinal neuron (LAPN) …
DoxOn videos shown from two independent experiments, three separate animals at Dox1On Day 8 of LAPN silencing. Videos shown from the same animal at 1x, 0.5x, and 0.25x speed.
Videos shown from the same animal at 1x, 0.5x, and 0.25x speed during overground and treadmill stepping at Dox1OnDays 4 and 5.
Videos shown from the same animal at the same DoxOn time point at 1x, 0.5x, and 0.25x speed.
Videos shown from the same animal at the Control and DoxOn time points at 1x and 0.5x speed.
Videos shown from the same animal at 1x, 0.5x, and 0.25x speed.
Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strain, strain background (female Sprague-Dawley rats) | Envigo | 200–220 g, approximately 10–12 weeks old | ||
Antibody (GFP) | Rabbit IgG | Abcam ab290 | 1:5000 | |
Antibody (NeuN) | Guinea pig IgG | Millipore ABN90P | 1:500 | |
Antibody (NeuN) | Mouse IgM | Millipore MAB377 | 1:500 | |
Antibody (neurofilament) | Mouse IgM | Sigma N5264 | 1:30,000 | |
Antibody (synaptophysin) | Mouse IgM | Millipore MAB5258-50UG | 1:10,000 | |
Antibody (vesicular glutamate transporter 2) | Guinea pig IgG | Millipore AB2251-I | 1:5000 | |
Antibody (vesicular GABA transporter) | Goat igG | Frontier Institute VGAT-Go-Af620 | 1:500 | |
Antibody (non-immune sera) | Rabbit IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch #711-005-152 | 1:5000 | |
Antibody (secondary AlexaFluor 488) | Rabbit IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch # 711-545-152 | 1:200 | |
Antibody (secondary AlexaFluor 594) | Guinea pig IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch #706-585-148 | 1:200 | |
Antibody (secondary AlexaFluor 594) | Mouse IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch # 715-585-150 | 1:200 | |
Antibody (secondary AlexaFluor 647) | Mouse IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch # 715-605-151 | 1:200 | |
Antibody (secondary AlexaFluor 647) | Guinea pig IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch # 706-546-148 | 1:200 | |
Antibody (secondary AlexaFluor 647) | Goat IgG | Jackson ImmunoResearch # 705-605-147 | 1:200 | |
HiRet-TRE-EGFP.eTeNT | Generous gift from Tadashi Isa | 1.6 × 107 vp/ml | ||
AAV2-CMV-rtTAV16 | Generous gift from Tadashi Isa | 4.8 × 1012 vp/ml | ||
HiRet-Cre | Generous gift from Zhigang He | 1.6 × 1012 vp/ml | ||
AAV2-CAG-FLEx-GFP | UNC Vector Core | 3.5 × 1012 vp/ml | ||
Chemical compound (Sylgard) | Sylgard-coated surface | Sylgard 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit, Dow Corning | ||
Chemical compound (cholera toxin B subunit conjugate) | CTB-488 | Invitrogen/Molecular Probes C-34775 | 1.5% solution in sterile saline | |
Chemical compound (cholera toxin B subunit conjugate) | CTB-594 | Invitrogen/Molecular Probes C-34777 | 1.5% solution in sterile saline | |
Chemical compound (cholera toxin B subunit conjugate) | CTB-647 | Invitrogen/Molecular Probes C-34778 | 1.5% solution in sterile saline |
The fundamental relationship between speed and the various speed-dependent locomotor parameters remains intact despite the silencing-induced disruption to interlimb coordination.
Time point comparisons reveal that silencing long ascending propriospinal neurons (LAPNs) did not affect the underlying foundation relationship between speed and stance duration, stride duration, and stride length at the fore- and hindlimbs, respectively. Running the same comparisons on the curated dataset of Dox-induced affected stepping yielded similar results (‘Dox-induced affected step’). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and p values shown post-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Silencing long ascending propriospinal neurons (LAPNs) functionally uncouples the intra-girdle left-right limb pairs during overground locomotion.
Interlimb coordination data were analyzed using Watson’s non-parametric two-sample U (Orlovskiĭ et al., 1999) test (Critical value of Watson’s U2 = 0.1869; Appendix D, TableD.44) (Zar, 1974)
Silencing long ascending propriospinal neurons (LAPNs) disrupts interlimb coordination in select behavioral contexts.
Interlimb coordination data were analyzed using Watson’s non-parametric two-sample U (Orlovskiĭ et al., 1999) test (Critical value of Watson’s U2 = 0.1869; Appendix D, TableD.44) (Zar, 1974)