Abstract

The Xist lncRNA mediates X chromosome inactivation (XCI)1,2. Here we show that Spen, an Xist-binding repressor protein essential for XCI3-9, binds to ancient retroviral RNA, performing a surveillance role to recruit chromatin silencing machinery to these parasitic loci. Spen inactivation activates a subset of endogenous retroviral (ERV) elements in mouse embryonic stem cells, with gain of chromatin accessibility, active histone modifications, and ERV RNA transcription. Spen binds directly to ERV RNAs that show structural similarity to the A-repeat of Xist, a region critical for Xist-mediated gene silencing10-11. ERV RNA and Xist A-repeat bind the RRM domains of Spen in a competitive manner. Insertion of an ERV into an A-repeat deficient Xist rescues binding of Xist RNA to Spen and results in strictly local gene silencing in cis. These results suggest that Xist may coopt transposable element RNA-protein interactions to repurpose powerful antiviral chromatin silencing machinery for sex chromosome dosage compensation.

Data availability

All raw and processed sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession number GSE131413.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ava C Carter

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes and Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Jin Xu

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0944-9835
  3. Meagan Y Nakamoto

    Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yuning Wei

    Dermatology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Brian J Zarnegar

    Dermatology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Quanming Shi

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. James P Broughton

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ryan C Ransom

    Dept of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Ankit Salhotra

    Dept of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Surya D Nagaraja

    Institute for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Rui Li

    Institute for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Diana R Dou

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6269-9636
  13. Kathryn E Yost

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Seung-Woo Cho

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Anil Mistry

    Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Anil Mistry, is an employee of Novartis.
  16. Michael T Longaker

    Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Paul A Khavari

    Department of Dermatology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Robert T Batey

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Deborah S Wuttke

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Howard Y Chang

    Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    howchang@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    Howard Y Chang, Reviewing editor, eLifeis a co-founder of Accent Therapeutics, Boundless Bio, and an advisor to 10x Genomics, Arsenal Biosciences, and Spring Discovery.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9459-4393

Funding

National Human Genome Research Institute (HG007735)

  • Howard Y Chang

National Human Genome Research Institute (HG004361)

  • Howard Y Chang

Scleroderma Research Foundation

  • Howard Y Chang

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Howard Y Chang

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM120347)

  • Robert T Batey
  • Deborah S Wuttke

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DEO26730)

  • Michael T Longaker

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Carter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,024
    views
  • 793
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ava C Carter
  2. Jin Xu
  3. Meagan Y Nakamoto
  4. Yuning Wei
  5. Brian J Zarnegar
  6. Quanming Shi
  7. James P Broughton
  8. Ryan C Ransom
  9. Ankit Salhotra
  10. Surya D Nagaraja
  11. Rui Li
  12. Diana R Dou
  13. Kathryn E Yost
  14. Seung-Woo Cho
  15. Anil Mistry
  16. Michael T Longaker
  17. Paul A Khavari
  18. Robert T Batey
  19. Deborah S Wuttke
  20. Howard Y Chang
(2020)
Spen links RNA-mediated endogenous retrovirus silencing and X chromosome inactivation
eLife 9:e54508.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54508

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54508

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Shihui Chen, Carolyn Marie Phillips
    Research Article

    RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved pathway that utilizes Argonaute proteins and their associated small RNAs to exert gene regulatory function on complementary transcripts. While the majority of germline-expressed RNAi proteins reside in perinuclear germ granules, it is unknown whether and how RNAi pathways are spatially organized in other cell types. Here, we find that the small RNA biogenesis machinery is spatially and temporally organized during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. Specifically, the RNAi factor, SIMR-1, forms visible concentrates during mid-embryogenesis that contain an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a poly-UG polymerase, and the unloaded nuclear Argonaute protein, NRDE-3. Curiously, coincident with the appearance of the SIMR granules, the small RNAs bound to NRDE-3 switch from predominantly CSR-class 22G-RNAs to ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs. NRDE-3 binds ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs in the somatic cells of larvae and adults to silence ERGO-target genes; here we further demonstrate that NRDE-3-bound, CSR-class 22G-RNAs repress transcription in oocytes. Thus, our study defines two separable roles for NRDE-3, targeting germline-expressed genes during oogenesis to promote global transcriptional repression, and switching during embryogenesis to repress recently duplicated genes and retrotransposons in somatic cells, highlighting the plasticity of Argonaute proteins and the need for more precise temporal characterization of Argonaute-small RNA interactions.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.