Asymmetric clustering of centrosomes defines the early evolution of tetraploid cells

Abstract

Tetraploidy has long been of interest to both cell and cancer biologists, partly because of its documented role in tumorigenesis. A common model proposes that the extra centrosomes that are typically acquired during tetraploidization are responsible for driving tumorigenesis. However, tetraploid cells evolved in culture have been shown to lack extra centrosomes. This observation raises questions about how tetraploid cells evolve and more specifically about the mechanisms(s) underlying centrosome loss. Here, using a combination of fixed cell analysis, live cell imaging, and mathematical modeling, we show that populations of newly formed tetraploid cells rapidly evolve in vitro to retain a near-tetraploid chromosome number while losing the extra centrosomes gained at the time of tetraploidization. This appears to happen through a process of natural selection in which tetraploid cells that inherit a single centrosome during a bipolar division with asymmetric centrosome clustering are favored for long-term survival.

Data availability

All data generated during the study are provided in clearly labeled source data files in excel format.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicolaas C Baudoin

    Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Joshua M Nicholson

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kimberly Soto

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Olga Martin

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jing Chen

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    For correspondence
    chenjing@vt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniela Cimini

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    For correspondence
    cimini@vt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4082-4894

Funding

Virginia Tech College of Science (Dean's Discovery Fund)

  • Daniela Cimini

Fralin Life Sciences Institute (Discretionary funds)

  • Daniela Cimini

ICTAS Center for Engineered Health (Seed funding)

  • Daniela Cimini

National Science Foundation (MCB-1517506)

  • Daniela Cimini

Virginia Tech Graduate School (BIOTRANS IGEP)

  • Nicolaas C Baudoin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Baudoin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,021
    views
  • 500
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicolaas C Baudoin
  2. Joshua M Nicholson
  3. Kimberly Soto
  4. Olga Martin
  5. Jing Chen
  6. Daniela Cimini
(2020)
Asymmetric clustering of centrosomes defines the early evolution of tetraploid cells
eLife 9:e54565.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54565

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54565

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.

    1. Cell Biology
    John Yong, Jacqueline E Villalta ... Calvin H Jan
    Research Article

    Protein aggregation increases during aging and is a pathological hallmark of many age-related diseases. Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) depends on a core network of factors directly influencing protein production, folding, trafficking, and degradation. Cellular proteostasis also depends on the overall composition of the proteome and numerous environmental variables. Modulating this cellular proteostasis state can influence the stability of multiple endogenous proteins, yet the factors contributing to this state remain incompletely characterized. Here, we performed genome-wide CRISPRi screens to elucidate the modulators of proteostasis state in mammalian cells, using a fluorescent dye to monitor endogenous protein aggregation. These screens identified known components of the proteostasis network and uncovered a novel link between protein and lipid homeostasis. Increasing lipid uptake and/or disrupting lipid metabolism promotes the accumulation of sphingomyelins and cholesterol esters and drives the formation of detergent-insoluble protein aggregates at the lysosome. Proteome profiling of lysosomes revealed ESCRT accumulation, suggesting disruption of ESCRT disassembly, lysosomal membrane repair, and microautophagy. Lipid dysregulation leads to lysosomal membrane permeabilization but does not otherwise impact fundamental aspects of lysosomal and proteasomal functions. Together, these results demonstrate that lipid dysregulation disrupts ESCRT function and impairs proteostasis.