1. Cell Biology
Download icon

Asymmetric clustering of centrosomes defines the early evolution of tetraploid cells

Research Article
  • Cited 3
  • Views 1,411
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e54565 doi: 10.7554/eLife.54565

Abstract

Tetraploidy has long been of interest to both cell and cancer biologists, partly because of its documented role in tumorigenesis. A common model proposes that the extra centrosomes that are typically acquired during tetraploidization are responsible for driving tumorigenesis. However, tetraploid cells evolved in culture have been shown to lack extra centrosomes. This observation raises questions about how tetraploid cells evolve and more specifically about the mechanisms(s) underlying centrosome loss. Here, using a combination of fixed cell analysis, live cell imaging, and mathematical modeling, we show that populations of newly formed tetraploid cells rapidly evolve in vitro to retain a near-tetraploid chromosome number while losing the extra centrosomes gained at the time of tetraploidization. This appears to happen through a process of natural selection in which tetraploid cells that inherit a single centrosome during a bipolar division with asymmetric centrosome clustering are favored for long-term survival.

Data availability

All data generated during the study are provided in clearly labeled source data files in excel format.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicolaas C Baudoin

    Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Joshua M Nicholson

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kimberly Soto

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Olga Martin

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jing Chen

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    For correspondence
    chenjing@vt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniela Cimini

    Department of Biological Sciences and Fralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    For correspondence
    cimini@vt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4082-4894

Funding

Virginia Tech College of Science (Dean's Discovery Fund)

  • Daniela Cimini

Fralin Life Sciences Institute (Discretionary funds)

  • Daniela Cimini

ICTAS Center for Engineered Health (Seed funding)

  • Daniela Cimini

National Science Foundation (MCB-1517506)

  • Daniela Cimini

Virginia Tech Graduate School (BIOTRANS IGEP)

  • Nicolaas C Baudoin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon Pines, Institute of Cancer Research Research, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: December 19, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 28, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 29, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 26, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: June 5, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Baudoin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,411
    Page views
  • 305
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Ina Lantzsch et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Most female meiotic spindles undergo striking morphological changes while transitioning from metaphase to anaphase. The ultra-structure of meiotic spindles, and how changes to this structure correlate with such dramatic spindle rearrangements remains largely unknown. To address this, we applied light microscopy, large-scale electron tomography and mathematical modeling of female meiotic Caenorhabditis elegans spindles. Combining these approaches, we find that meiotic spindles are dynamic arrays of short microtubules that turn over within seconds. The results show that the metaphase to anaphase transition correlates with an increase in microtubule numbers and a decrease in their average length. Detailed analysis of the tomographic data revealed that the microtubule length changes significantly during the metaphase-to-anaphase transition. This effect is most pronounced for microtubules located within 150 nm of the chromosome surface. To understand the mechanisms that drive this transition, we developed a mathematical model for the microtubule length distribution that considers microtubule growth, catastrophe, and severing. Using Bayesian inference to compare model predictions and data, we find that microtubule turn-over is the major driver of the spindle reorganizations. Our data suggest that in metaphase only a minor fraction of microtubules, those closest to the chromosomes, are severed. The large majority of microtubules, which are not in close contact with chromosomes, do not undergo severing. Instead, their length distribution is fully explained by growth and catastrophe. This suggests that the most prominent drivers of spindle rearrangements are changes in nucleation and catastrophe rate. In addition, we provide evidence that microtubule severing is dependent on katanin.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Jiajia Ma et al.
    Research Article

    Epithelial tissues are primed to respond to insults by activating epithelial cell motility and rapid inflammation. Such responses are also elicited upon overexpression of the membrane bound protease, Matriptase, or mutation of its inhibitor, Hai1. Unrestricted Matriptase activity also predisposes to carcinoma. How Matriptase leads to these cellular outcomes is unknown. We demonstrate that zebrafish hai1a mutants show increased H2O2, NfkB signalling, and IP3R -mediated calcium flashes, and that these promote inflammation, but do not generate epithelial cell motility. In contrast, inhibition of the Gq subunit in hai1a mutants rescues both the inflammation and epithelial phenotypes, with the latter recapitulated by the DAG analogue, PMA. We demonstrate that hai1a has elevated MAPK pathway activity, inhibition of which rescues the epidermal defects. Finally, we identify RSK kinases as MAPK targets disrupting adherens junctions in hai1a mutants. Our work maps novel signalling cascades mediating the potent effects of Matriptase on epithelia, with implications for tissue damage response and carcinoma progression.