(A) Schematic of trial structure wherein mice perform repeated self-initiated trials with contrasting reward volumes associated with each port. Animals were tested at four relative reward ratios …
Source Data for Figure 1.
(A) Schematic of visual discrimination task. Mice acquired a simple goal-direction contingency over repeated sessions. (B) Task engagement was measured as the total number of registered trial …
(A) A proxy of task engagement was measured as the average latency from trial onset (center-light ON) to initiation. Nrxn1α KOs (blue, n = 10) do not exhibit global deficits in task engagement in …
Source data for Figure 2.
(A) Nrxn1α KO mice exhibit extended choice latencies across reward environments. (B) There are no genotypic differences in the total session reward consumption, regardless of reward contrast (left) …
(A) Effort paradigm schematic. Mice distribute choices in a session with fixed contingency lasting 150 trials. Animals were given choices with equal reward outcomes, but different effort …
Source Data for Figure 3.
(A) Q-learning reinforcement model. Mouse choice was modeled as a probabilistic choice between two options of different value (QL,QR) using a softmax decision function. Data from each reinforcement …
Source Data for Figure 4.
(A–D) Model biases. A bias term was generated for each relative reward ratio to capture potential difference in how animals develop biases in different reward environments. There is no statistically …
(A) Nrxn1α was conditionally inactivated in telencephalic excitatory neurons by crossing a Nrxn1α-conditional knockout allele onto NexCre line. Controls for both the Nex (light gray) and …
Source Data for Figure 5.
(A) In-task adaptability. There is a main effect for genotype on the adaptability measures between Nrxn1αfl/fl; NexCre controls and mutant mice. Otherwise there are no differences in adaptability …
(A) Neurexin1α was conditionally inactivated in thalamic progenitor cells by crossing the Neurexin1α-conditional knockout line onto the Olig3-Cre line. (B) Coronal section of Olig3Cre; Ai14 reporter …
Source Data for Figure 6.
(A) In-task adaptability. There is no effect for genotype on the adaptability measures of OligCre control and OligCre; Nrxn1αfl/fl mutant mice. (B) Relative initiation latency. We noted no …
(A) Schematic of experimental scheme. Control (Nrxn1α+/+; NexCre/+, n = 7) mice were injected with a retro-AAV2-EF1α−3xFLAG-Cre virus in the substantia nigra, pars reticulata (SNr). Ipsilateral …
Source Data for Figure 7.
(A) Mean photometry signals for animals in engaged and disengaged epochs of the task revealed statistically smaller signals during periods of task engagement, without phenotypic differences. Engaged …
(A and B) PSTH of ΔF/F for Nex-control (Nrxn1α+/+; NexCre/+, n = 7, gray) and Nex-Nrxn1αcKO (Nrxn1αfl/fl; NexCre/+, n = 6, purple) mice, respectively, aligned to initiation event (segregated by …
Source Data for Figure 8.
(A, Left) Experimental schematic where putative dSPNs are labeled with either retroAAV2.
EF1α−3xFLAG-Cre (together with AAV5.EF1α.DIO::tdTOM in striatum for visualization of retrogradely labeled neurons) or retroAAV2.hSyn-GFP-ΔCre (an enzymatically inactive truncated version of Cre) in the SNr. (A, right) Visualization of infected p-dSPNs for acute slice whole cell recordings. (B) No difference in mIPSC amplitude or frequency was noted between Cre and ΔCre viral constructs. (C) Schematic to test the effect of adult retrograde Cre expression on excitatory synaptic connectivity to p-dSPNs. (D) No difference in mEPSC amplitude or frequency was noted between Cre and ΔCre viral constructs. B and D analyzed by t-test. Data represented as mean ± SEM.
10 individual traces selected from trials following large reward (blue) and trials following small reward (red). Panel A and C show z-scored data while B and C show raw ΔF/F(%).
Table of Summary Statistics.