1. Neuroscience

Distinct signals in medial and lateral VTA dopamine neurons modulate fear extinction at different times

  1. Lili X Cai
  2. Katherine Pizano
  3. Gregory W Gundersen
  4. Cameron L Hayes
  5. Weston T Fleming
  6. Sebastian Holt
  7. Julia M Cox
  8. Ilana B Witten  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54936
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Lili X Cai
  2. Katherine Pizano
  3. Gregory W Gundersen
  4. Cameron L Hayes
  5. Weston T Fleming
  6. Sebastian Holt
  7. Julia M Cox
  8. Ilana B Witten
(2020)
Distinct signals in medial and lateral VTA dopamine neurons modulate fear extinction at different times
eLife 9:e54936.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54936
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) neurons are known to encode reward prediction error (RPE), in addition to other signals, such as salience. While RPE is known to support learning, the role of salience in supporting learning remains less clear. To address this, we recorded and manipulated VTA DA neurons in mice during fear extinction, a behavior we observed to generate spatially segregated RPE and salience signals. We applied deep learning to classify mouse freezing behavior, eliminating the need for human scoring. Our fiber photometry recordings showed that DA neurons in medial and lateral VTA have distinct activity profiles during fear extinction: medial VTA activity more closely reflected RPE, while lateral VTA activity more closely reflected a salience-like signal. Optogenetic inhibition of DA neurons in either region slowed fear extinction, with the relevant time period for inhibition differing across regions. Our results indicate that salience-like signals can have similar downstream consequences to RPE-like signals, although with different temporal dependencies.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study will be included in the manuscript as supporting files. Code for all steps is available on GitHub:https://github.com/neurocaience/deepfreeze/ (Cai et al. 2020)

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lili X Cai

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Katherine Pizano

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Gregory W Gundersen

    Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Cameron L Hayes

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0388-5807

  5. Weston T Fleming

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Sebastian Holt

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Julia M Cox

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Ilana B Witten

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    iwitten@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0548-2160

Funding

NIH (T32MH065214)

  • Lili X Cai

NYSCF

  • Ilana B Witten

ARO (W911NF1710554)

  • Ilana B Witten

NIH (1R01MH106689-01A1)

  • Ilana B Witten

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments followed guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health and reviewed by Princeton University Institutional Animals Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol 1876-18).

Copyright

© 2020, Cai et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,440
    views
  • 810
    downloads
  • 86
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lili X Cai
  2. Katherine Pizano
  3. Gregory W Gundersen
  4. Cameron L Hayes
  5. Weston T Fleming
  6. Sebastian Holt
  7. Julia M Cox
  8. Ilana B Witten
(2020)
Distinct signals in medial and lateral VTA dopamine neurons modulate fear extinction at different times
eLife 9:e54936.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54936

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54936

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    A neurocomputational account of the link between social perception and social action

    Lisa M Bas, Ian D Roberts ... Anita Tusche
    Research Article

    People selectively help others based on perceptions of their merit or need. Here, we develop a neurocomputational account of how these social perceptions translate into social choice. Using a novel fMRI social perception task, we show that both merit and need perceptions recruited the brain’s social inference network. A behavioral computational model identified two non-exclusive mechanisms underlying variance in social perceptions: a consistent tendency to perceive others as meritorious/needy (bias) and a propensity to sample and integrate normative evidence distinguishing high from low merit/need in other people (sensitivity). Variance in people’s merit (but not need) bias and sensitivity independently predicted distinct aspects of altruism in a social choice task completed months later. An individual’s merit bias predicted context-independent variance in people’s overall other-regard during altruistic choice, biasing people toward prosocial actions. An individual’s merit sensitivity predicted context-sensitive discrimination in generosity toward high and low merit recipients by influencing other- and self-regard during altruistic decision-making. This context-sensitive perception–action link was associated with activation in the right temporoparietal junction. Together, these findings point toward stable, biologically based individual differences in perceptual processes related to abstract social concepts like merit, and suggest that these differences may have important behavioral implications for an individual’s tendency toward favoritism or discrimination in social settings.

    1. Neuroscience

    Ventral tegmental area interneurons revisited: GABA and glutamate projection neurons make local synapses

    Lucie Oriol, Melody Chao ... Thomas S Hnasko
    Research Article

    The ventral tegmental area (VTA) contains projection neurons that release the neurotransmitters dopamine, GABA, and/or glutamate from distal synapses. VTA also contains GABA neurons that synapse locally on to dopamine neurons, synapses widely credited to a population of so-called VTA interneurons. Interneurons in cortex, striatum, and elsewhere have well-defined morphological features, physiological properties, and molecular markers, but such features have not been clearly described in VTA. Indeed, there is scant evidence that local and distal synapses originate from separate populations of VTA GABA neurons. In this study, we tested whether several markers expressed in non-dopamine VTA neurons are selective markers of interneurons, defined as neurons that synapse locally but not distally. Challenging previous assumptions, we found that VTA neurons genetically defined by expression of parvalbumin, somatostatin, neurotensin, or Mu-opioid receptor project to known VTA targets including nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, lateral habenula, and prefrontal cortex. Moreover, we provide evidence that VTA GABA and glutamate projection neurons make functional inhibitory or excitatory synapses locally within VTA. These findings suggest that local collaterals of VTA projection neurons could mediate functions prior attributed to VTA interneurons. This study underscores the need for a refined understanding of VTA connectivity to explain how heterogeneous VTA circuits mediate diverse functions related to reward, motivation, or addiction.

    1. Neuroscience

    Pain: Revisiting the role of Substance P and CGRPα

    Weihua Cai, Arkady Khoutorsky
    Insight

    Mice lacking two neuropeptides thought to be essential for processing pain show no change in how they respond to a wide range of harmful stimuli.