Human Fcγ-receptor IIb modulates pathogen-specific versus self-reactive antibody responses in Lyme arthritis

  1. Heike Danzer
  2. Joachim Glaesner
  3. Anne Baerenwaldt
  4. Carmen Reitinger
  5. Anja Lux
  6. Lukas Heger
  7. Diane Dudziak
  8. Thomas Harrer
  9. André Gessner
  10. Falk Nimmerjahn  Is a corresponding author
  1. Division of Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  2. University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
  3. University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
  4. University Hospital Erlangen, Germany

Abstract

Pathogen specific antibody responses need to be tightly regulated to generate protective but limit self-reactive immune responses. While loss of humoral tolerance has been associated with microbial infections, the pathways involved in balancing protective versus autoreactive antibody responses in humans are incompletely understood. Studies in classical mouse model systems have provided evidence that balancing of immune responses through inhibitory receptors is an important quality control checkpoint. Genetic differences between inbred mouse models and the outbred human population and allelic receptor variants not present in mice, however, argue for caution when directly translating these findings to the human system. By studying Borrelia burgdorferi infection in humanized mice reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells from donors homozygous for a functional or non-functional FcgRIIb allele, we show that the human inhibitory FcgRIIb is a critical checkpoint balancing protective and autoreactive immune responses, linking infection with induction of autoimmunity in the human immune system.

Data availability

All data generated and analysed during the study are included in the manuscript. Source data files can be provided on request.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Heike Danzer

    Biology, Division of Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Joachim Glaesner

    Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anne Baerenwaldt

    Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Carmen Reitinger

    Biology, Division of Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anja Lux

    Biology, Division of Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lukas Heger

    Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Diane Dudziak

    Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Thomas Harrer

    Medicine III, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. André Gessner

    Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4316-2408
  10. Falk Nimmerjahn

    Departemtn of Biology, Division of Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    falk.nimmerjahn@fau.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5418-316X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR130-P13)

  • Falk Nimmerjahn

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 2886)

  • Falk Nimmerjahn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Tomohiro Kurosaki, Osaka University, Japan

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in strict accordance to the rules and regulations of the German animal welfare law. All animal experiments were approved by the government of lower Franconia (Permit Numbers: 2532-2-469 and 2532.2-817-11).

Version history

  1. Received: January 20, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 19, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Danzer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 998
    views
  • 193
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Heike Danzer
  2. Joachim Glaesner
  3. Anne Baerenwaldt
  4. Carmen Reitinger
  5. Anja Lux
  6. Lukas Heger
  7. Diane Dudziak
  8. Thomas Harrer
  9. André Gessner
  10. Falk Nimmerjahn
(2020)
Human Fcγ-receptor IIb modulates pathogen-specific versus self-reactive antibody responses in Lyme arthritis
eLife 9:e55319.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55319

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55319

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Medicine
    Joanna C Porter, Jamie Inshaw ... Venizelos Papayannopoulos
    Research Article

    Background:

    Prinflammatory extracellular chromatin from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and other cellular sources is found in COVID-19 patients and may promote pathology. We determined whether pulmonary administration of the endonuclease dornase alfa reduced systemic inflammation by clearing extracellular chromatin.

    Methods:

    Eligible patients were randomized (3:1) to the best available care including dexamethasone (R-BAC) or to BAC with twice-daily nebulized dornase alfa (R-BAC + DA) for seven days or until discharge. A 2:1 ratio of matched contemporary controls (CC-BAC) provided additional comparators. The primary endpoint was the improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP) over time, analyzed using a repeated-measures mixed model, adjusted for baseline factors.

    Results:

    We recruited 39 evaluable participants: 30 randomized to dornase alfa (R-BAC +DA), 9 randomized to BAC (R-BAC), and included 60 CC-BAC participants. Dornase alfa was well tolerated and reduced CRP by 33% compared to the combined BAC groups (T-BAC). Least squares (LS) mean post-dexamethasone CRP fell from 101.9 mg/L to 23.23 mg/L in R-BAC +DA participants versus a 99.5 mg/L to 34.82 mg/L reduction in the T-BAC group at 7 days; p=0.01. The anti-inflammatory effect of dornase alfa was further confirmed with subgroup and sensitivity analyses on randomised participants only, mitigating potential biases associated with the use of CC-BAC participants. Dornase alfa increased live discharge rates by 63% (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.01–2.61, p=0.03), increased lymphocyte counts (LS mean: 1.08 vs 0.87, p=0.02) and reduced circulating cf-DNA and the coagulopathy marker D-dimer (LS mean: 570.78 vs 1656.96 μg/mL, p=0.004).

    Conclusions:

    Dornase alfa reduces pathogenic inflammation in COVID-19 pneumonia, demonstrating the benefit of cost-effective therapies that target extracellular chromatin.

    Funding:

    LifeArc, Breathing Matters, The Francis Crick Institute (CRUK, Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT04359654.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Hee Young Kim, Yeon Jun Kang ... Won-Woo Lee
    Research Article

    Trained immunity is the long-term functional reprogramming of innate immune cells, which results in altered responses toward a secondary challenge. Despite indoxyl sulfate (IS) being a potent stimulus associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related inflammation, its impact on trained immunity has not been explored. Here, we demonstrate that IS induces trained immunity in monocytes via epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming, resulting in augmented cytokine production. Mechanistically, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) contributes to IS-trained immunity by enhancing the expression of arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism-related genes such as arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase (ALOX5) and ALOX5 activating protein (ALOX5AP). Inhibition of AhR during IS training suppresses the induction of IS-trained immunity. Monocytes from end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have increased ALOX5 expression and after 6 days training, they exhibit enhanced TNF-α and IL-6 production to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Furthermore, healthy control-derived monocytes trained with uremic sera from ESRD patients exhibit increased production of TNF-α and IL-6. Consistently, IS-trained mice and their splenic myeloid cells had increased production of TNF-α after in vivo and ex vivo LPS stimulation compared to that of control mice. These results provide insight into the role of IS in the induction of trained immunity, which is critical during inflammatory immune responses in CKD patients.