MeCP2 in cholinergic interneurons of nucleus accumbens regulates fear learning

  1. Ying Zhang
  2. Yi Zhu
  3. Shu-Xia Cao
  4. Peng Sun
  5. Jian-Ming Yang
  6. Yan-Fang Xia
  7. Shi-Ze Xie
  8. Xiao-Dan Yu
  9. Jia-Yu Fu
  10. Chen-Jie Shen
  11. Hai-Yang He
  12. Hao-Qi Pan
  13. Xiao-Juan Chen
  14. Hao Wang
  15. Xiao-Ming Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
  2. Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, China

Abstract

Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) encoded by the MECP2 gene is a transcriptional regulator whose mutations cause Rett syndrome (RTT). Mecp2-deficient mice show fear regulation impairment; however, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this abnormal behavior are largely uncharacterized. Here, we showed that Mecp2 gene deficiency in cholinergic interneurons of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) dramatically impaired fear learning. We further found that spontaneous activity of cholinergic interneurons in Mecp2-deficient mice decreased, mediated by enhanced inhibitory transmission via α2-containing GABAA receptors. With MeCP2 restoration, opto- and chemo-genetic activation, and RNA interference in ChAT-expressing interneurons of the NAc, impaired fear retrieval was rescued. Taken together, these results reveal a previously unknown role of MeCP2 in NAc cholinergic interneurons in fear regulation, suggesting that modulation of neurons in the NAc may ameliorate fear-related disorders.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ying Zhang

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yi Zhu

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shu-Xia Cao

    Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Peng Sun

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jian-Ming Yang

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yan-Fang Xia

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shi-Ze Xie

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiao-Dan Yu

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jia-Yu Fu

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Chen-Jie Shen

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hai-Yang He

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Hao-Qi Pan

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xiao-Juan Chen

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Hao Wang

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Xiao-Ming Li

    Center for Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of the Ministry of Health of China, Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    lixm@zju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8617-1702

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Plan of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YF051000)

  • Xiao-Ming Li

Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31430034)

  • Xiao-Ming Li

Science and Technology Program of Guangdong (2018B030334001)

  • Xiao-Ming Li

Key Realm R&D Prgram of Guangdong Province (2019B030335001)

  • Xiao-Ming Li

Funds for Creative Research Groups of China from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81521062)

  • Xiao-Ming Li

Non-Profit Central Research Institute Fund of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT310023)

  • Xiao-Ming Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mouse care and use followed the guidelines of the Animal Advisory Committee at Zhejiang University and the US National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The care and use of the mice in this work were reviewed and approved by the Animal Advisory Committee at Zhejiang University (ZJU201553001). Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2020, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,094
    views
  • 395
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ying Zhang
  2. Yi Zhu
  3. Shu-Xia Cao
  4. Peng Sun
  5. Jian-Ming Yang
  6. Yan-Fang Xia
  7. Shi-Ze Xie
  8. Xiao-Dan Yu
  9. Jia-Yu Fu
  10. Chen-Jie Shen
  11. Hai-Yang He
  12. Hao-Qi Pan
  13. Xiao-Juan Chen
  14. Hao Wang
  15. Xiao-Ming Li
(2020)
MeCP2 in cholinergic interneurons of nucleus accumbens regulates fear learning
eLife 9:e55342.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55342

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55342

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Simonas Griesius, Amy Richardson, Dimitri Michael Kullmann
    Research Article

    Non-linear summation of synaptic inputs to the dendrites of pyramidal neurons has been proposed to increase the computation capacity of neurons through coincidence detection, signal amplification, and additional logic operations such as XOR. Supralinear dendritic integration has been documented extensively in principal neurons, mediated by several voltage-dependent conductances. It has also been reported in parvalbumin-positive hippocampal basket cells, in dendrites innervated by feedback excitatory synapses. Whether other interneurons, which support feed-forward or feedback inhibition of principal neuron dendrites, also exhibit local non-linear integration of synaptic excitation is not known. Here, we use patch-clamp electrophysiology, and two-photon calcium imaging and glutamate uncaging, to show that supralinear dendritic integration of near-synchronous spatially clustered glutamate-receptor mediated depolarization occurs in NDNF-positive neurogliaform cells and oriens-lacunosum moleculare interneurons in the mouse hippocampus. Supralinear summation was detected via recordings of somatic depolarizations elicited by uncaging of glutamate on dendritic fragments, and, in neurogliaform cells, by concurrent imaging of dendritic calcium transients. Supralinearity was abolished by blocking NMDA receptors (NMDARs) but resisted blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Blocking L-type calcium channels abolished supralinear calcium signalling but only had a minor effect on voltage supralinearity. Dendritic boosting of spatially clustered synaptic signals argues for previously unappreciated computational complexity in dendrite-projecting inhibitory cells of the hippocampus.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jessica Royer, Valeria Kebets ... Boris C Bernhardt
    Research Article Updated

    Complex structural and functional changes occurring in typical and atypical development necessitate multidimensional approaches to better understand the risk of developing psychopathology. Here, we simultaneously examined structural and functional brain network patterns in relation to dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) dataset. Several components were identified, recapitulating the psychopathology hierarchy, with the general psychopathology (p) factor explaining most covariance with multimodal imaging features, while the internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental dimensions were each associated with distinct morphological and functional connectivity signatures. Connectivity signatures associated with the p factor and neurodevelopmental dimensions followed the sensory-to-transmodal axis of cortical organization, which is related to the emergence of complex cognition and risk for psychopathology. Results were consistent in two separate data subsamples and robust to variations in analytical parameters. Although model parameters yielded statistically significant brain–behavior associations in unseen data, generalizability of the model was rather limited for all three latent components (r change from within- to out-of-sample statistics: LC1within = 0.36, LC1out = 0.03; LC2within = 0.34, LC2out = 0.05; LC3within = 0.35, LC3out = 0.07). Our findings help in better understanding biological mechanisms underpinning dimensions of psychopathology, and could provide brain-based vulnerability markers.