Loss of Ena/VASP interferes with lamellipodium architecture, motility and integrin-dependent adhesion

  1. Julia Damiano- Guercio
  2. Laëtitia Kurzawa
  3. Jan Mueller
  4. Georgi Dimchev
  5. Matthias Schaks
  6. Maria Nemethova
  7. Thomas Pokrant
  8. Stefan Brühmann
  9. Joern Linkner
  10. Laurent Blanchoin
  11. Michael Sixt
  12. Klemens Rottner
  13. Jan Faix  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hannover Medical School, Germany
  2. CytoMorphoLab, France
  3. Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), Austria
  4. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
  5. Interdisciplinary Research Institute Grenoble, France

Abstract

Cell migration entails networks and bundles of actin filaments termed lamellipodia and microspikes or filopodia, respectively, as well as focal adhesions, all of which recruit Ena/VASP family members hitherto thought to antagonize efficient cell motility. However, we find these proteins to act as positive regulators of migration in different murine cell lines. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated loss of Ena/VASP proteins reduced lamellipodial actin assembly and perturbed lamellipodial architecture, as evidenced by changed network geometry as well as reduction of filament length and number that was accompanied by abnormal Arp2/3 complex and heterodimeric capping protein accumulation. Loss of Ena/VASP function also abolished the formation of microspikes normally embedded in lamellipodia, but not of filopodia capable of emanating without lamellipodia. Ena/VASP-deficiency also impaired integrin-mediated adhesion accompanied by reduced traction forces exerted through these structures. Our data thus uncover novel Ena/VASP functions of these actin polymerases that are fully consistent with their promotion of cell migration.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all Figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julia Damiano- Guercio

    Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Laëtitia Kurzawa

    Integrative Structural and Cellular Biology Department, CytoMorphoLab, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jan Mueller

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Georgi Dimchev

    Division of Molecular Cell Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthias Schaks

    Division of Molecular Cell Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maria Nemethova

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thomas Pokrant

    Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stefan Brühmann

    Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Joern Linkner

    Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Laurent Blanchoin

    Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Interdisciplinary Research Institute Grenoble, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8146-9254
  11. Michael Sixt

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6620-9179
  12. Klemens Rottner

    Zoological Institute - Division of Molecular Cell Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4244-4198
  13. Jan Faix

    Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
    For correspondence
    faix.jan@mh-hannover.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1803-9192

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FA 330/11-1)

  • Jan Faix

H2020 European Research Council (AAA 741773)

  • Laurent Blanchoin

H2020 European Research Council (CoG 724373)

  • Michael Sixt

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RO2414/5-1)

  • Klemens Rottner

Technische Universität Braunschweig (GRK2223/1)

  • Klemens Rottner

Austrian Science Fund

  • Michael Sixt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Damiano- Guercio et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,552
    views
  • 563
    downloads
  • 87
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julia Damiano- Guercio
  2. Laëtitia Kurzawa
  3. Jan Mueller
  4. Georgi Dimchev
  5. Matthias Schaks
  6. Maria Nemethova
  7. Thomas Pokrant
  8. Stefan Brühmann
  9. Joern Linkner
  10. Laurent Blanchoin
  11. Michael Sixt
  12. Klemens Rottner
  13. Jan Faix
(2020)
Loss of Ena/VASP interferes with lamellipodium architecture, motility and integrin-dependent adhesion
eLife 9:e55351.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55351

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55351

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.

    1. Cell Biology
    Ling Cheng, Ian Meliala ... Mikael Björklund
    Research Article

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in numerous diseases and the aging process. The integrated stress response (ISR) serves as a critical adaptation mechanism to a variety of stresses, including those originating from mitochondria. By utilizing mass spectrometry-based cellular thermal shift assay (MS-CETSA), we uncovered that phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1), also known as Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP), is thermally stabilized by stresses which induce mitochondrial ISR. Depletion of PEBP1 impaired mitochondrial ISR activation by reducing eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation and subsequent ISR gene expression, which was independent of PEBP1’s role in inhibiting the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. Consistently, overexpression of PEBP1 potentiated ISR activation by heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase, the principal eIF2α kinase in the mitochondrial ISR pathway. Real-time interaction analysis using luminescence complementation in live cells revealed an interaction between PEBP1 and eIF2α, which was disrupted by eIF2α S51 phosphorylation. These findings suggest a role for PEBP1 in amplifying mitochondrial stress signals, thereby facilitating an effective cellular response to mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, PEBP1 may be a potential therapeutic target for diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.