Proximal CA1 20-40 Hz power dynamics reflect trial-specific information processing supporting nonspatial sequence memory

  1. Sandra Gattas
  2. Gabriel A Elias
  3. John Janecek
  4. Michael A Yassa  Is a corresponding author
  5. Norbert J Fortin  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Irvine, United States

Abstract

The hippocampus is known to play a critical role in processing information about temporal context. However, it remains unclear how hippocampal oscillations are involved, and how their functional organization is influenced by connectivity gradients. We examined local field potential activity in CA1 as rats performed a nonspatial odor sequence memory task. We found that odor sequence processing epochs were characterized by distinct spectral profiles and proximo-distal CA1 gradients of theta and 20-40 Hz power than track running epochs. We also discovered that 20-40 Hz power was predictive of sequence memory performance, particularly in proximal CA1 and during the plateau of high power observed on trials in which animals had to maintain their decision until instructed to respond. Altogether, these results provide evidence that dynamics of 20-40 Hz power along the CA1 axis are linked to trial-specific processing of nonspatial information critical to order judgements and are consistent with a role for 20-40 Hz power in gating information processing.

Data availability

Data available on Dryad, Data DOI: doi:10.7280/D11960

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sandra Gattas

    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1608-1469
  2. Gabriel A Elias

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. John Janecek

    Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael A Yassa

    Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    michael.yassa@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8635-1498
  5. Norbert J Fortin

    Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    norbert.fortin@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (CAREER Award IOS-1150292)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Science Foundation (BCS 1439267)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Institutes of Health (R01 MH115697)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Institutes of Health (R01 DC017687)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Institutes of Health (R01 MH102392)

  • Michael A Yassa

National Institutes of Health (R01 AG053555)

  • Michael A Yassa

National Institutes of Health (Training Grant T32 NS45540)

  • Sandra Gattas

National Institutes of Health (Training Grant T32 DC010775)

  • Gabriel A Elias

Whitehall Foundation (2010-05-84)

  • Norbert J Fortin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines from care and use of laboratory animals published by the National Institutes of Health. All animals were handled according to an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol (Protocol AUP-20-174).

Copyright

© 2022, Gattas et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 800
    views
  • 142
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sandra Gattas
  2. Gabriel A Elias
  3. John Janecek
  4. Michael A Yassa
  5. Norbert J Fortin
(2022)
Proximal CA1 20-40 Hz power dynamics reflect trial-specific information processing supporting nonspatial sequence memory
eLife 11:e55528.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55528

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55528

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    John P Grogan, Matthias Raemaekers ... Sanjay G Manohar
    Research Article

    Motivation depends on dopamine, but might be modulated by acetylcholine which influences dopamine release in the striatum, and amplifies motivation in animal studies. A corresponding effect in humans would be important clinically, since anticholinergic drugs are frequently used in Parkinson’s disease, a condition that can also disrupt motivation. Reward and dopamine make us more ready to respond, as indexed by reaction times (RT), and move faster, sometimes termed vigour. These effects may be controlled by preparatory processes that can be tracked using electroencephalography (EEG). We measured vigour in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of trihexyphenidyl (THP), a muscarinic antagonist, with an incentivised eye movement task and EEG. Participants responded faster and with greater vigour when incentives were high, but THP blunted these motivational effects, suggesting that muscarinic receptors facilitate invigoration by reward. Preparatory EEG build-up (contingent negative variation [CNV]) was strengthened by high incentives and by muscarinic blockade, although THP reduced the incentive effect. The amplitude of preparatory activity predicted both vigour and RT, although over distinct scalp regions; frontal activity predicted vigour, whereas a larger, earlier, central component predicted RT. The incentivisation of RT was partly mediated by the CNV, though vigour was not. Moreover, the CNV mediated the drug’s effect on dampening incentives, suggesting that muscarinic receptors underlie the motivational influence on this preparatory activity. Taken together, these findings show that a muscarinic blocker impairs motivated action in healthy people, and that medial frontal preparatory neural activity mediates this for RT.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    LeYuan Gu, WeiHui Shao ... HongHai Zhang
    Research Article

    The advent of midazolam holds profound implications for modern clinical practice. The hypnotic and sedative effects of midazolam afford it broad clinical applicability. However, the specific mechanisms underlying the modulation of altered consciousness by midazolam remain elusive. Herein, using pharmacology, optogenetics, chemogenetics, fiber photometry, and gene knockdown, this in vivo research revealed the role of locus coeruleus (LC)-ventrolateral preoptic nucleus noradrenergic neural circuit in regulating midazolam-induced altered consciousness. This effect was mediated by α1 adrenergic receptors. Moreover, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type A (GABAA-R) represents a mechanistically crucial binding site in the LC for midazolam. These findings will provide novel insights into the neural circuit mechanisms underlying the recovery of consciousness after midazolam administration and will help guide the timing of clinical dosing and propose effective intervention targets for timely recovery from midazolam-induced loss of consciousness.