Proximal CA1 20-40 Hz power dynamics reflect trial-specific information processing supporting nonspatial sequence memory

  1. Sandra Gattas
  2. Gabriel A Elias
  3. John Janecek
  4. Michael A Yassa  Is a corresponding author
  5. Norbert J Fortin  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Irvine, United States

Abstract

The hippocampus is known to play a critical role in processing information about temporal context. However, it remains unclear how hippocampal oscillations are involved, and how their functional organization is influenced by connectivity gradients. We examined local field potential activity in CA1 as rats performed a nonspatial odor sequence memory task. We found that odor sequence processing epochs were characterized by distinct spectral profiles and proximo-distal CA1 gradients of theta and 20-40 Hz power than track running epochs. We also discovered that 20-40 Hz power was predictive of sequence memory performance, particularly in proximal CA1 and during the plateau of high power observed on trials in which animals had to maintain their decision until instructed to respond. Altogether, these results provide evidence that dynamics of 20-40 Hz power along the CA1 axis are linked to trial-specific processing of nonspatial information critical to order judgements and are consistent with a role for 20-40 Hz power in gating information processing.

Data availability

Data available on Dryad, Data DOI: doi:10.7280/D11960

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sandra Gattas

    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1608-1469
  2. Gabriel A Elias

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. John Janecek

    Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael A Yassa

    Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    michael.yassa@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8635-1498
  5. Norbert J Fortin

    Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    norbert.fortin@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Science Foundation (CAREER Award IOS-1150292)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Science Foundation (BCS 1439267)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Institutes of Health (R01 MH115697)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Institutes of Health (R01 DC017687)

  • Norbert J Fortin

National Institutes of Health (R01 MH102392)

  • Michael A Yassa

National Institutes of Health (R01 AG053555)

  • Michael A Yassa

National Institutes of Health (Training Grant T32 NS45540)

  • Sandra Gattas

National Institutes of Health (Training Grant T32 DC010775)

  • Gabriel A Elias

Whitehall Foundation (2010-05-84)

  • Norbert J Fortin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines from care and use of laboratory animals published by the National Institutes of Health. All animals were handled according to an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol (Protocol AUP-20-174).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura L Colgin, University of Texas at Austin, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 28, 2020
  2. Preprint posted: March 10, 2020 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: May 9, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: May 9, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 6, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Gattas et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 442
    Page views
  • 102
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sandra Gattas
  2. Gabriel A Elias
  3. John Janecek
  4. Michael A Yassa
  5. Norbert J Fortin
(2022)
Proximal CA1 20-40 Hz power dynamics reflect trial-specific information processing supporting nonspatial sequence memory
eLife 11:e55528.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55528

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sophie L Fayad, Guillaume Ourties ... Nathalie Leresche
    Research Article Updated

    Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel is a major molecular actor of neuropathic pain in peripheral sensory neurons, but its involvement at the supraspinal level is almost unknown. In the anterior pretectum (APT), a hub of connectivity of the somatosensory system involved in pain perception, we show that Cav3.2 channels are expressed in a subpopulation of GABAergic neurons coexpressing parvalbumin (PV). In these PV-expressing neurons, Cav3.2 channels contribute to a high-frequency-bursting activity, which is increased in the spared nerve injury model of neuropathy. Specific deletion of Cav3.2 channels in APT neurons reduced both the initiation and maintenance of mechanical and cold allodynia. These data are a direct demonstration that centrally expressed Cav3.2 channels also play a fundamental role in pain pathophysiology.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sarah M Lurie, James E Kragel ... Joel L Voss
    Research Article

    Hippocampal-dependent memory is thought to be supported by distinct connectivity states, with strong input to the hippocampus benefitting encoding and weak input benefitting retrieval. Previous research in rodents suggests that the hippocampal theta oscillation orchestrates the transition between these states, with opposite phase angles predicting minimal versus maximal input. We investigated whether this phase dependence exists in humans using network-targeted intracranial stimulation. Intracranial local field potentials were recorded from individuals with epilepsy undergoing medically necessary stereotactic electroencephalographic recording. In each subject, biphasic bipolar direct electrical stimulation was delivered to lateral temporal sites with demonstrated connectivity to hippocampus. Lateral temporal stimulation evoked ipsilateral hippocampal potentials with distinct early and late components. Using evoked component amplitude to measure functional connectivity, we assessed whether the phase of hippocampal theta predicted relatively high versus low connectivity. We observed an increase in the continuous phase-amplitude relationship selective to the early and late components of the response evoked by lateral temporal stimulation. The maximal difference in these evoked component amplitudes occurred across 180 degrees of separation in the hippocampal theta rhythm; i.e., the greatest difference in component amplitude was observed when stimulation was delivered at theta peak versus trough. The pattern of theta phase dependence observed for hippocampus was not identified for control locations. These findings demonstrate that hippocampal receptivity to input varies with theta phase, suggesting that theta phase reflects connectivity states of human hippocampal networks. These findings confirm a putative mechanism by which neural oscillations modulate human hippocampal function.