A whole-brain connectivity map of mouse insular cortex

  1. Daniel August Gehrlach
  2. Caroline Weiand
  3. Thomas N Gaitanos
  4. Eunjae Cho
  5. Alexandra S Klein
  6. Alexandru A Hennrich
  7. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann
  8. Nadine Gogolla  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Germany
  2. Max von Pettenkofer-Institute & Gene Center, Germany

Abstract

The insular cortex (IC) plays key roles in emotional and regulatory brain functions and is affected across psychiatric diseases. However, the brain-wide connections of the mouse IC have not been comprehensively mapped. Here we traced the whole-brain inputs and outputs of the mouse IC across its rostro-caudal extent. We employed cell-type specific monosynaptic rabies virus tracings to characterize afferent connections onto either excitatory or inhibitory IC neurons, and adeno-associated viral tracings to label excitatory efferent axons. While the connectivity between the IC and other cortical regions was highly bidirectional, the IC connectivity with subcortical structures was often unidirectional, revealing prominent cortical-to-subcortical or subcortical-to-cortical pathways. The posterior and medial IC exhibited resembling connectivity patterns, while the anterior IC connectivity was distinct, suggesting two major functional compartments. Our results provide insights into the anatomical architecture of the mouse IC and thus a structural basis to guide investigations into its complex functions.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided in Supplementary File 2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniel August Gehrlach

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Caroline Weiand

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Thomas N Gaitanos

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eunjae Cho

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Alexandra S Klein

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alexandru A Hennrich

    Medical Faculty, Max von Pettenkofer-Institute & Gene Center, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann

    Medical Faculty, Max von Pettenkofer-Institute & Gene Center, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nadine Gogolla

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    For correspondence
    ngogolla@neuro.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3754-7133

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Caroline Weiand
  • Nadine Gogolla

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1665)

  • Daniel August Gehrlach
  • Alexandru A Hennrich
  • Karl-Klaus Conzelmann
  • Nadine Gogolla

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (ERC-2017-STG 758448)

  • Thomas N Gaitanos
  • Nadine Gogolla

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE37-0021)

  • Alexandra S Klein
  • Nadine Gogolla

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animals were used in accordance with the regulations and under licenses obtained from the government of Upper Bavaria (Animal license AZ: 55.2-1-54-2532-56-2014).

Copyright

© 2020, Gehrlach et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,824
    views
  • 2,340
    downloads
  • 192
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daniel August Gehrlach
  2. Caroline Weiand
  3. Thomas N Gaitanos
  4. Eunjae Cho
  5. Alexandra S Klein
  6. Alexandru A Hennrich
  7. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann
  8. Nadine Gogolla
(2020)
A whole-brain connectivity map of mouse insular cortex
eLife 9:e55585.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55585

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55585

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mi-Seon Kong, Ethan Ancell ... Larry S Zweifel
    Research Article

    The central amygdala (CeA) has emerged as an important brain region for regulating both negative (fear and anxiety) and positive (reward) affective behaviors. The CeA has been proposed to encode affective information in the form of valence (whether the stimulus is good or bad) or salience (how significant is the stimulus), but the extent to which these two types of stimulus representation occur in the CeA is not known. Here, we used single cell calcium imaging in mice during appetitive and aversive conditioning and found that majority of CeA neurons (~65%) encode the valence of the unconditioned stimulus (US) with a smaller subset of cells (~15%) encoding the salience of the US. Valence and salience encoding of the conditioned stimulus (CS) was also observed, albeit to a lesser extent. These findings show that the CeA is a site of convergence for encoding oppositely valenced US information.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sharon Inberg, Yael Iosilevskii ... Benjamin Podbilewicz
    Research Article

    Dendrites are crucial for receiving information into neurons. Sensory experience affects the structure of these tree-like neurites, which, it is assumed, modifies neuronal function, yet the evidence is scarce, and the mechanisms are unknown. To study whether sensory experience affects dendritic morphology, we use the Caenorhabditis elegans' arborized nociceptor PVD neurons, under natural mechanical stimulation induced by physical contacts between individuals. We found that mechanosensory signals induced by conspecifics and by glass beads affect the dendritic structure of the PVD. Moreover, developmentally isolated animals show a decrease in their ability to respond to harsh touch. The structural and behavioral plasticity following sensory deprivation are functionally independent of each other and are mediated by an array of evolutionarily conserved mechanosensory amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (degenerins). Calcium imaging of the PVD neurons in a micromechanical device revealed that controlled mechanical stimulation of the body wall produces similar calcium dynamics in both isolated and crowded animals. Our genetic results, supported by optogenetic, behavioral, and pharmacological evidence, suggest an activity-dependent homeostatic mechanism for dendritic structural plasticity, that in parallel controls escape response to noxious mechanosensory stimuli.