A whole-brain connectivity map of mouse insular cortex

  1. Daniel August Gehrlach
  2. Caroline Weiand
  3. Thomas N Gaitanos
  4. Eunjae Cho
  5. Alexandra S Klein
  6. Alexandru A Hennrich
  7. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann
  8. Nadine Gogolla  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Germany
  2. Max von Pettenkofer-Institute & Gene Center, Germany

Abstract

The insular cortex (IC) plays key roles in emotional and regulatory brain functions and is affected across psychiatric diseases. However, the brain-wide connections of the mouse IC have not been comprehensively mapped. Here we traced the whole-brain inputs and outputs of the mouse IC across its rostro-caudal extent. We employed cell-type specific monosynaptic rabies virus tracings to characterize afferent connections onto either excitatory or inhibitory IC neurons, and adeno-associated viral tracings to label excitatory efferent axons. While the connectivity between the IC and other cortical regions was highly bidirectional, the IC connectivity with subcortical structures was often unidirectional, revealing prominent cortical-to-subcortical or subcortical-to-cortical pathways. The posterior and medial IC exhibited resembling connectivity patterns, while the anterior IC connectivity was distinct, suggesting two major functional compartments. Our results provide insights into the anatomical architecture of the mouse IC and thus a structural basis to guide investigations into its complex functions.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided in Supplementary File 2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniel August Gehrlach

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Caroline Weiand

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Thomas N Gaitanos

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eunjae Cho

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Alexandra S Klein

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alexandru A Hennrich

    Medical Faculty, Max von Pettenkofer-Institute & Gene Center, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann

    Medical Faculty, Max von Pettenkofer-Institute & Gene Center, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nadine Gogolla

    Neurobiology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg, Germany
    For correspondence
    ngogolla@neuro.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3754-7133

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Caroline Weiand
  • Nadine Gogolla

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1665)

  • Daniel August Gehrlach
  • Alexandru A Hennrich
  • Karl-Klaus Conzelmann
  • Nadine Gogolla

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (ERC-2017-STG 758448)

  • Thomas N Gaitanos
  • Nadine Gogolla

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE37-0021)

  • Alexandra S Klein
  • Nadine Gogolla

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animals were used in accordance with the regulations and under licenses obtained from the government of Upper Bavaria (Animal license AZ: 55.2-1-54-2532-56-2014).

Copyright

© 2020, Gehrlach et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,490
    views
  • 2,306
    downloads
  • 190
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daniel August Gehrlach
  2. Caroline Weiand
  3. Thomas N Gaitanos
  4. Eunjae Cho
  5. Alexandra S Klein
  6. Alexandru A Hennrich
  7. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann
  8. Nadine Gogolla
(2020)
A whole-brain connectivity map of mouse insular cortex
eLife 9:e55585.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55585

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55585

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mitchell P Morton, Sachira Denagamage ... Anirvan S Nandy
    Research Article

    Identical stimuli can be perceived or go unnoticed across successive presentations, producing divergent behavioral outcomes despite similarities in sensory input. We sought to understand how fluctuations in behavioral state and cortical layer and cell class-specific neural activity underlie this perceptual variability. We analyzed physiological measurements of state and laminar electrophysiological activity in visual area V4 while monkeys were rewarded for correctly reporting a stimulus change at perceptual threshold. Hit trials were characterized by a behavioral state with heightened arousal, greater eye position stability, and enhanced decoding performance of stimulus identity from neural activity. Target stimuli evoked stronger responses in V4 in hit trials, and excitatory neurons in the superficial layers, the primary feed-forward output of the cortical column, exhibited lower variability. Feed-forward interlaminar population correlations were stronger on hits. Hit trials were further characterized by greater synchrony between the output layers of the cortex during spontaneous activity, while the stimulus-evoked period showed elevated synchrony in the feed-forward pathway. Taken together, these results suggest that a state of elevated arousal and stable retinal images allow enhanced processing of sensory stimuli, which contributes to hits at perceptual threshold.

    1. Neuroscience
    Anup Das, Vinod Menon
    Research Article

    Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks underpin human cognitive processes, but their electrophysiological mechanisms remain elusive. The triple network model, encompassing the salience network (SN), default mode network (DMN), and frontoparietal network (FPN), provides a framework for understanding these interactions. We analyzed intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings from 177 participants across four diverse episodic memory experiments, each involving encoding as well as recall phases. Phase transfer entropy analysis revealed consistently higher directed information flow from the anterior insula (AI), a key SN node, to both DMN and FPN nodes. This directed influence was significantly stronger during memory tasks compared to resting state, highlighting the AI’s task-specific role in coordinating large-scale network interactions. This pattern persisted across externally driven memory encoding and internally governed free recall. Control analyses using the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) showed an inverse pattern, with DMN and FPN exerting higher influence on IFG, underscoring the AI’s unique role. We observed task-specific suppression of high-gamma power in the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus node of the DMN during memory encoding, but not recall. Crucially, these results were replicated across all four experiments spanning verbal and spatial memory domains with high Bayes replication factors. Our findings advance understanding of how coordinated neural network interactions support memory processes, highlighting the AI’s critical role in orchestrating large-scale brain network dynamics during both memory encoding and retrieval. By elucidating the electrophysiological basis of triple network interactions in episodic memory, our study provides insights into neural circuit dynamics underlying memory function and offer a framework for investigating network disruptions in memory-related disorders.