The effect of climate change on yellow fever disease burden in Africa

  1. Katy AM Gaythorpe  Is a corresponding author
  2. Arran Hamlet
  3. Laurence Cibrelus
  4. Tini Garske
  5. Neil M Ferguson
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  2. World Health Organisation, Switzerland
12 figures, 1 video, 7 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 4 supplements
Observed YF occurrence (left) and median probability of a YF report predicted by the GLM.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Schematic of data sources and models adapted from Gaythorpe et al., 2019.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Comparison of force of infection estimates for each admin level 1 unit where we have serological surveys between the estimate from serological surveys only and the GLM within the Bayesian hiearchical model.

In each survey, 100 samples for force of infection are compared.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3
Median posterior predicted deaths in 2050 (log10 scale).
Figure 1—figure supplement 4
Median posterior predicted deaths in 2070 (log10 scale).
Figure 2 with 4 supplements
Median predicted model outputs for baseline scenario.

(Left) Median posterior predicted temperature suitability for the African endemic region with average temperature. (Right) Median predicted FOI for the African endemic region at baseline.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Bite rate per day of Aedes aegypti mosquitos in response to temperature change.

Data is shown with red dots and posterior model samples are shown in grey with the black line indicating median predicted bite rate given temperature in °C. The bite rate of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes is informed by two data sets, that of Mordecai et al. and Martens et al.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Mortality rate per day of Aedes aegypti mosquitos in response to temperature change.

Data is shown with red dots and posterior model samples are shown in grey with the black line indicating median predicted bite rate given temperature in °C. The data was collected experimentally in Tesla et al.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3
Inverse extrinsic incubation period in response to temperature change.

Data is shown with red dots and posterior model samples are shown in grey with the black line indicating median predicted bite rate given temperature in °C. This is estimated using data from Davis which was calculated specifically for yellow fever in Aedes aegypti. The prediction of the median incubation period at 25°C is in line with that of Johansson et al., 2010 who found it to be 10 days [2.0 - 37] days.

Figure 2—figure supplement 4
Temperature suitability in response to temperature change.

Data is shown with red dots and posterior model samples are shown in grey with the black line indicating median predicted bite rate given temperature in °C. The model is also informed by the YF occurrence data within the Bayesian hierarchical framework.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Percentage change in force of infection in 2070.

Median predicted change in force of infection in the African endemic region in 2070 for the four emission scenarios.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Percentage change in force of infection in 2050.

Median predicted change in FOI in African endemic region in 2050 for the four emission scenarios.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Posterior distribution of the change in the spatial mean force of infection (%) for each region of Africa, year and climate scenario.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Country groupings in regions used in the manuscript with West, yellow; Central, purple and East, green.

Sudan is a member of the North African region; however, due to the grouping of endemic countries, we include Sudan in the East African region.

Figure 5 with 3 supplements
Posterior predicted annual YF deaths per capita for each country in the African endemic region in 2070.

Countries are ordered by longitude.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Posterior predicted deaths per capita for each country in the African endemic region in 2050.

Countries are ordered by longitude.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Posterior predicted deaths for each country in the African endemic region in 2050.

Countries are ordered by longitude.

Figure 5—figure supplement 3
Posterior predicted deaths for each country in the African endemic region in 2070.

Countries are ordered by longitude.

Spatial data inputs for generalised linear model.

Countries shown in black are not considered endemic for YF. (a) Estimated mean monthly rainfall (mm) for baseline/current scenario. (b) Average temperature at baseline/current scenario in °C. (c) Longitude. (d) Range in temperature at baseline/current scenario in °C.

Appendix 1—figure 1
Location of serological study sites shown in green.
Appendix 1—figure 2
Traceplots for all parameters.
Appendix 1—figure 3
Coefficient of variation (%) for GLM predictions.
Appendix 1—figure 4
Predicted force of infection change (%) for each country and scenario in 2050.

Note, countries are ordered by difference and may vary in position. (a) RCP 2.6, (b) RCP 4.5, (c) RCP 6.0, (d) RCP 8.5.

Appendix 1—figure 5
Predicted force of infection change (%) for each country and scenario in 2070.

Note, countries are ordered by difference and may vary in position. (a) RCP 2.6, (b) RCP 4.5, (c) RCP 6.0, (d) RCP 8.5.

Appendix 1—figure 6
Predicted mean force of infection per country for 2050 and 2070 under 3 modelling scenarios.

Projections are calculated from the median posterior predicted force of infection per province. All projections assume temperature and/or rainfall changing under RCP 8.5.

Videos

Video 1
Percentage change in deaths from 2020 to 2070 in three regions in the African Endemic region under 4 climate change scenarios.

100 samples of the posterior predicted trajectories are shown.

Tables

Table 1
Predicted percentage change in deaths in the African endemic region in 2050 and 2070 compared to the baseline/current scenario.
YearScenario95% CrI low50% CrI lowMedian50% CrI high95% CrI high
2050RCP 2.6−2.364.4910.8418.5837.91
2050RCP 4.5−2.407.3216.7128.1657.43
2050RCP 6.0−2.786.7915.4925.8651.85
2050RCP 8.5−2.1711.0324.9241.8488.33
2070RCP 2.6−0.744.119.9917.0334.10
2070RCP 4.5−2.767.7719.2833.5671.08
2070RCP 6.0−4.568.6321.3536.7077.70
2070RCP 8.5−2.9016.0839.5772.43178.63
Table 2
Generalised linear model covariates.
CovariateInterpretation
log(survey quality)Log of the survey quality for countries in YFSD.
adm05Country factors for countries not in YFSD.
longitudeLongitude of province centroid
temperature suitabilityTemperature suitability at average suitability of province.
temperature rangeTemperature range in province.
rainfallMean Precipitation in province.
log(pop)Log of the human population size of the province
Table 3
Projected change in global mean surface air temperature and CO2 concentrations by 2100 relative to the reference period of 1986–2005 (Stocker, 2013).
ScenarioTemperature rise (°C) [range]CO2 concentrations (ppm)
RCP 2.61 [0.3 to 1.7]421
RCP 4.51.8 [1.1 to 2.6]538
RCP 6.02.2 [1.4 to 3.1]670
RCP 8.53.7 [2.6 to 4.8]936
Appendix 1—table 1
Characteristics of included serological surveys. Recreated from Gaythorpe et al., 2019.
LocationSample sizeYearReference
Nigeria1841990Omilabu et al., 1990
Democratic Republic of the Congo1401985Werner and Huber, 1984
Republic of the Congo3601985Merlin et al., 1986
Cameroon (North)8401987Tsai et al., 1987
Cameroon (South)2562001Kuniholm et al., 2006
Uganda (zones)5842012
Rwanda (zones)12862012
Zambia (zones)36792013
Sudan (zones)18142012
Kenya (zones)19602013
Ethiopia (zones)16452014Mengesha Tsegaye et al., 2018
Democratic republic of the Congo (zones)4792014
South Sudan (zones)14802014
Chad (zones)3522014
Appendix 1—table 2
Parameter estimates with low and high ends of the 95% credible interval.
Parameter95% CrI lowMedian95% CrI highMeaning
a_c0.00020.00030.0003Bite rate
a_T00.22052.92857.2004Bite rate
a_Tm40.022340.136840.2981Bite rate
adm05AGO1.13821.76562.3960GLM coefficients
adm05BDI−1.1566−0.32750.4671GLM coefficients
adm05ERI−0.9901−0.10740.7519GLM coefficients
adm05ETH−1.2878−0.53660.1882GLM coefficients
adm05GNB−1.4959−0.7566−0.0692GLM coefficients
adm05KEN−1.1264−0.35100.3722GLM coefficients
adm05MRT−1.1837−0.42180.2927GLM coefficients
adm05RWA−1.1411−0.31750.4826GLM coefficients
adm05SDN−0.8870−0.11060.6377GLM coefficients
adm05SOM−1.0177−0.14250.7144GLM coefficients
adm05SSD−0.9086−0.07960.7140GLM coefficients
adm05TZA−1.3990−0.64420.0812GLM coefficients
adm05UGA−0.6618−0.00810.6163GLM coefficients
adm05ZMB−1.2049−0.38400.3975GLM coefficients
Intercept−16.4268−13.2731−10.2753GLM coefficients
log.surv.qual.adm00.32090.50480.6917GLM coefficients
logpop0.91331.14661.3913GLM coefficients
lon−1.1806−0.9173−0.6557GLM coefficients
mu_c−0.8003−0.7578−0.7166Mortality
mu_T012.213312.713713.1498Mortality
mu_Tm38.034138.048138.0532Mortality
iEIP_c0.00010.00010.0002Inverse EIP
iEIP_T010.941217.672422.2418Inverse EIP
iEIP_Tm39.073742.107545.5927Inverse EIP
temp_suitability0.01010.15230.3863GLM coefficients
worldclim_rainfall0.23380.46290.6969GLM coefficients
worldclim_temp_range−0.19120.03680.2687GLM coefficients
Appendix 1—table 3
Deaths in the African endemic region in 2050 and 2070 compared to the baseline/constant scenario.
YearScenarioMedian95% Cr interval
2050RCP 2.6191309[62462, 468985]
2050RCP 4.5200470[66330, 499615]
2050RCP 6.0198096[65113, 489494]
2050RCP 8.5214427[69699, 554842]
2050baseline172668[58177, 395300]
2070RCP 2.6273582[90275, 653145]
2070RCP 4.5298822[99694, 735109]
2070RCP 6.0301001[99551, 739950]
2070RCP 8.5349157[108913, 933389]
2070baseline249556[84877, 560186]
Appendix 1—table 4
Probability of increase (%) in deaths in the African endemic region in 2050 and 2070 compared to the baseline/constant scenario.
YearScenarioMedian95% Cr interval
2050RCP 2.692.97[92.7, 93.23]
2050RCP 4.594.85[94.61, 95.07]
2050RCP 6.094.89[94.64, 95.13]
2050RCP 8.595.98[95.78, 96.17]
2070RCP 2.695.47[95.24, 95.7]
2070RCP 4.594.64[94.41, 94.88]
2070RCP 6.094.10[93.85, 94.35]
2070RCP 8.595.94[95.72, 96.15]

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katy AM Gaythorpe
  2. Arran Hamlet
  3. Laurence Cibrelus
  4. Tini Garske
  5. Neil M Ferguson
(2020)
The effect of climate change on yellow fever disease burden in Africa
eLife 9:e55619.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55619