m6A RNA methylation impacts fate choices during skin morphogenesis

  1. Linghe Xi
  2. Thomas Carroll
  3. Irina Matos
  4. Ji-Dung Luo
  5. Lisa Polak
  6. H Amalia Pasolli
  7. Jens C. Brüning
  8. Samie R Jaffrey
  9. Elaine Fuchs  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rockefeller University, United States
  2. The Rockefeller University, United States
  3. Institute for Genetics and Center for Molecular Medicine (CMMC), University of Cologne, Germany
  4. Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, United States

Abstract

N6-methyladenosine is the most prominent RNA modification in mammals. Here we study mouse skin embryogenesis to tackle m6A’s functions and physiological importance. We first landscape the m6A modifications on skin epithelial progenitor mRNAs. Contrasting with in vivo ribosomal profiling, we unearth a correlation between m6A-modification in coding sequences and enhanced translation, particularly of key morphogenetic signaling pathways. Tapping physiological relevance, we show that m6A loss profoundly alters these cues and perturbs cellular fate choices and tissue architecture in all skin lineages. By single-cell transcriptomics and bioinformatics, both signaling and canonical translation pathways show significant downregulation after m6A loss. Interestingly, however, many highly m6A-modified mRNAs are markedly upregulated upon m6A loss, and they encode RNA-methylation, RNA-processing and RNA-metabolism factors. Together, our findings suggest that m6A functions to enhance translation of key morphogenetic regulators, while also destabilizing sentinel mRNAs that are primed to activate rescue pathways when m6A levels drop.

Data availability

The miCLIP and single-cell RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository with the accession codes GSE147415, GSE147489 and GSE14749.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Linghe Xi

    Robin Chemers Neustein Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Thomas Carroll

    Bioinformatics Resouce Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Irina Matos

    Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6100-8020
  4. Ji-Dung Luo

    Bioinformatics Resource Center, The Rockefeller University, New York City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0150-1440
  5. Lisa Polak

    Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. H Amalia Pasolli

    Electron Microscopy Resource Center, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jens C. Brüning

    Department of Mouse Genetics and Metabolism, Institute for Genetics and Center for Molecular Medicine (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Samie R Jaffrey

    Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3615-6958
  9. Elaine Fuchs

    Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    fuchs@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    Elaine Fuchs, Elaine Fuchs is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards of L'Oreal and Arsenal Biosciences.Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1239-5316

Funding

Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Dale F. and Betty Ann Frey Fellow,DRG-2263-16)

  • Linghe Xi

National Institute of Health (R01-AR27883)

  • Elaine Fuchs

National Institute of Health (R01-AR31737)

  • Elaine Fuchs

National Institute of Health (R01-CA186702)

  • Samie R Jaffrey

National Institute of Health (R21-CA224391)

  • Samie R Jaffrey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Valerie Horsley, Yale University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experimentation: All mouse strains were housed in an AAALAC-accredited facility and experiments were conducted according to the Rockefeller University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and NIH guidelines for Animal Care and Use. All animal procedures used in this study are described in our #20012-H & #17091-H protocols, which had been previously reviewed and approved by the Rockefeller University IACUC.

Version history

  1. Received: March 17, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 25, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 26, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 5, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Xi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,001
    views
  • 630
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Linghe Xi
  2. Thomas Carroll
  3. Irina Matos
  4. Ji-Dung Luo
  5. Lisa Polak
  6. H Amalia Pasolli
  7. Jens C. Brüning
  8. Samie R Jaffrey
  9. Elaine Fuchs
(2020)
m6A RNA methylation impacts fate choices during skin morphogenesis
eLife 9:e56980.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56980

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56980

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Zhimin Xu, Zhao Wang ... Yingchuan B Qi
    Research Article

    Precise developmental timing control is essential for organism formation and function, but its mechanisms are unclear. In C. elegans, the microRNA lin-4 critically regulates developmental timing by post-transcriptionally downregulating the larval-stage-fate controller LIN-14. However, the mechanisms triggering the activation of lin-4 expression toward the end of the first larval stage remain unknown. We demonstrate that the transmembrane transcription factor MYRF-1 is necessary for lin-4 activation. MYRF-1 is initially localized on the cell membrane, and its increased cleavage and nuclear accumulation coincide with lin-4 expression timing. MYRF-1 regulates lin-4 expression cell-autonomously and hyperactive MYRF-1 can prematurely drive lin-4 expression in embryos and young first-stage larvae. The tandem lin-4 promoter DNA recruits MYRF-1GFP to form visible loci in the nucleus, suggesting that MYRF-1 directly binds to the lin-4 promoter. Our findings identify a crucial link in understanding developmental timing regulation and establish MYRF-1 as a key regulator of lin-4 expression.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article Updated

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, brachydactyly B, and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.