Notch and TLR signaling coordinate monocyte cell fate and inflammation

  1. Jaba Gamrekelashvili  Is a corresponding author
  2. Tamar Kapanadze
  3. Stefan Sablotny
  4. Corina Ratiu
  5. Khaled Dastagir
  6. Matthias Lochner
  7. Susanne Karbach
  8. Philip Wenzel
  9. Andre Sitnow
  10. Susanne Fleig
  11. Tim Sparwasser
  12. Ulrich Kalinke
  13. Bernhard Holzmann
  14. Hermann Haller
  15. Florian P Limbourg  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany
  2. Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany
  3. University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany
  4. Institute of Infection Immunology, Twincore, Germany
  5. Technical University Munich, Germany

Abstract

Conventional Ly6Chi monocytes have developmental plasticity for a spectrum of differentiated phagocytes. Here we show, using conditional deletion strategies in a mouse model of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7-induced inflammation, that the spectrum of developmental cell fates of Ly6Chi monocytes, and the resultant inflammation, is coordinately regulated by TLR and Notch signaling. Cell-intrinsic Notch2 and TLR7-Myd88 pathways independently and synergistically promote Ly6Clo patrolling monocyte development from Ly6Chi monocytes under inflammatory conditions, while impairment in either signaling axis impairs Ly6Clo monocyte development. At the same time, TLR7 stimulation in the absence of functional Notch2 signaling promotes resident tissue macrophage gene expression signatures in monocytes in the blood and ectopic differentiation of Ly6Chi monocytes into macrophages and dendritic cells, which infiltrate the spleen and major blood vessels and are accompanied by aberrant systemic inflammation. Thus, Notch2 is a master regulator of Ly6Chi monocyte cell fate and inflammation in response to TLR signaling.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.Data from RNA sequencing have been deposited to NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are available under the accession number GSE147492.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jaba Gamrekelashvili

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    For correspondence
    Gamrekelashvli.Jaba@mh-hannover.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tamar Kapanadze

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stefan Sablotny

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Corina Ratiu

    Institut für Kardiovaskuläre Physiologie, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Khaled Dastagir

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Matthias Lochner

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Susanne Karbach

    Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Philip Wenzel

    Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Andre Sitnow

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Susanne Fleig

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tim Sparwasser

    Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, Institute of Infection Immunology, Twincore, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ulrich Kalinke

    Cluster of Excellence-Resolving Infection Susceptibility (RESIST),, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Bernhard Holzmann

    Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Hermann Haller

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Florian P Limbourg

    Dept of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
    For correspondence
    limbourg.florian@mh-hannover.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8313-7226

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GA 2443/2-1)

  • Jaba Gamrekelashvili

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Li948-7/1)

  • Florian P Limbourg

Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung (F/17/16)

  • Jaba Gamrekelashvili

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed with 8-12 weeks old mice and age and sex matched littermate controls with approval of the local animal welfare board LAVES (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit), Lower Saxony, Animal Studies Committee, animal study proposals #14-1666, #16-2251, #18-2777, #2014-63, #2018-221). Mice were housed in the central animal facility of Hannover Medical School (ZTL) and were maintained and supervised as approved by the Institutional Animal Welfare Officer (Tierschutzbeauftragter).

Copyright

© 2020, Gamrekelashvili et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,573
    views
  • 457
    downloads
  • 61
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jaba Gamrekelashvili
  2. Tamar Kapanadze
  3. Stefan Sablotny
  4. Corina Ratiu
  5. Khaled Dastagir
  6. Matthias Lochner
  7. Susanne Karbach
  8. Philip Wenzel
  9. Andre Sitnow
  10. Susanne Fleig
  11. Tim Sparwasser
  12. Ulrich Kalinke
  13. Bernhard Holzmann
  14. Hermann Haller
  15. Florian P Limbourg
(2020)
Notch and TLR signaling coordinate monocyte cell fate and inflammation
eLife 9:e57007.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57007

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57007

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Ana Cristina Chang-Gonzalez, Aoi Akitsu ... Wonmuk Hwang
    Research Advance

    Increasing evidence suggests that mechanical load on the αβ T-cell receptor (TCR) is crucial for recognizing the antigenic peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecule. Our recent all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that the inter-domain motion of the TCR is responsible for the load-induced catch bond behavior of the TCR-pMHC complex and peptide discrimination (Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024). To further examine the generality of the mechanism, we perform all-atom MD simulations of the B7 TCR under different conditions for comparison with our previous simulations of the A6 TCR. The two TCRs recognize the same pMHC and have similar interfaces with pMHC in crystal structures. We find that the B7 TCR-pMHC interface stabilizes under ∼15 pN load using a conserved dynamic allostery mechanism that involves the asymmetric motion of the TCR chassis. However, despite forming comparable contacts with pMHC as A6 in the crystal structure, B7 has fewer high-occupancy contacts with pMHC and exhibits higher mechanical compliance during the simulation. These results indicate that the dynamic allostery common to the TCRαβ chassis can amplify slight differences in interfacial contacts into distinctive mechanical responses and nuanced biological outcomes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Pavla Nedbalová, Nikola Kaislerova ... Tomáš Doležal
    Research Article

    During parasitoid wasp infection, activated immune cells of Drosophila melanogaster larvae release adenosine to conserve nutrients for immune response. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) is a methyl group donor for most methylations in the cell and is synthesized from methionine and ATP. After methylation, SAM is converted to S-adenosylhomocysteine, which is further metabolized to adenosine and homocysteine. Here, we show that the SAM transmethylation pathway is up-regulated during immune cell activation and that the adenosine produced by this pathway in immune cells acts as a systemic signal to delay Drosophila larval development and ensure sufficient nutrient supply to the immune system. We further show that the up-regulation of the SAM transmethylation pathway and the efficiency of the immune response also depend on the recycling of adenosine back to ATP by adenosine kinase and adenylate kinase. We therefore hypothesize that adenosine may act as a sensitive sensor of the balance between cell activity, represented by the sum of methylation events in the cell, and nutrient supply. If the supply of nutrients is insufficient for a given activity, adenosine may not be effectively recycled back into ATP and may be pushed out of the cell to serve as a signal to demand more nutrients.