Functionally specialized human CD4+ T-cell subsets express physicochemically distinct TCRs

  1. Sofya A Kasatskaya
  2. Kristin Ladell
  3. Evgeniy S Egorov
  4. Kelly L Miners
  5. Alexey N Davydov
  6. Maria Metsger
  7. Dmitry B Staroverov
  8. Elena K Matveyshina
  9. Irina A Shagina
  10. Ilgar Z Mamedov
  11. Mark Izraelson
  12. Pavel V Shelyakin
  13. Olga V Britanova
  14. David A Price
  15. Dmitriy M Chudakov  Is a corresponding author
  1. Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russian Federation
  2. Genomics of Adaptive Immunity Department, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
  3. Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, United Kingdom
  4. Adaptive Immunity Group, Central European Institute of Technology, Czech Republic
  5. Institute of Translational Medicine, Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Federation
  6. Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian Federation
  7. Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, United Kingdom
8 figures, 4 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Experimental overview.

Top: schematic representation of the general questions addressed in this study. Bottom: schematic representation of the experimental pipeline. Naive and effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets were …

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Gating strategy for the identification of effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.

Single lymphocytes were identified in a forward scatter-area (FCS-A) versus forward scatter-height (FSC-H) plot. Viable CD3+CD14CD19 cells were gated in the CD4+ lineage, and naive cells were …

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Averaged physicochemical characteristics of CDR3β repertoires from effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.

(A–F) Averaged physicochemical characteristics were measured for the five amino acids in the middle of the CDR3β sequences obtained from each effector/memory CD4T-cell subset (n = 8) from each …

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Averaged physicochemical characteristics of CDR3α repertoires from effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.

(A–F) Averaged physicochemical characteristics were measured for the five amino acids in the middle of the CDR3α sequences obtained from each effector/memory CD4T-cell subset (n = 8) from each …

Clonality and diversity of effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.

Observed diversity (top), the Chao1 estimator (middle), and the normalized Shannon-Wiener index (bottom) were calculated for each TCRα (left) and TCRβ repertoire (right) obtained from each …

Clonotype overlap among effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.

(A) Relative overlap between nucleotide-defined CDR3β repertoires obtained from donor-matched pairs of effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets. Clonotypes were matched on the basis of identical TRBV

Figure 5 with 4 supplements
Clonal relatedness among effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.

Cytoscape network analysis schemes represent the number and size (frequency) of nucleotide-defined clonotype variants shared among the top 2000 most frequent CDR3β clonotypes in each subset. Each …

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Clonal relatedness among the Th17, Th22, Th2a, and Th2 subsets of effector/memory CD4+ T-cells.

Cytoscape plots for each donor represent the number and size (frequency) of nucleotide-defined clonotype variants shared among the top 2000 most frequent CDR3β clonotypes in each subset. Details as …

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Clonal relatedness among the Th1, Th1-17, and Th17 subsets of effector/memory CD4+ T-cells.

Cytoscape plots for each donor represent the number and size (frequency) of nucleotide-defined clonotype variants shared among the top 2000 most frequent CDR3β clonotypes in each subset. Details as …

Figure 5—figure supplement 3
Clonal relatedness among Tregs and other subsets of effector/memory CD4+ T-cells.

Cytoscape plots for each donor represent the number and size (frequency) of nucleotide-defined clonotype variants shared among the top 2000 most frequent CDR3β clonotypes in each subset. Only …

Figure 5—figure supplement 4
Clonal relatedness among Tfh cells other subsets of effector/memory CD4+ T-cells.

Cytoscape plots for each donor represent the number and size (frequency) of nucleotide-defined clonotype variants shared among the top 2000 most frequent CDR3β clonotypes in each subset. Only …

Figure 6 with 2 supplements
Averaged physicochemical characteristics of CDR3β repertoires from naive CD4T-cell subsets.

(A) Repertoire analysis of RTEs (CD25CD31+), mature naive T cells (mNaive; CD25CD31), and naive Tregs (nTreg; CD25high) from healthy donors (n = 12). Matched letters in the key indicate twin …

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Averaged physicochemical characteristics of CDR3α repertoires from naive CD4T-cell subsets.

Repertoire metrics are shown for RTEs (CD25CD31+), mature naive T cells (mNaive; CD25CD31), and naive Tregs (nTreg; CD25high) from healthy donors (n = 7). Matched letters in the key indicate twin …

Figure 6—figure supplement 2
Gating strategy for the identification of naive CD4T-cell subsets.

Lymphocytes were identified in a forward scatter-area (FSC-A) versus side scatter-area (SSC-A) plot, and single cells were identified in FSC-A versus forward scatter-height (FSC-H) and FSC-A versus

Author response image 1
Author response image 2

Tables

Table 1
Gating strategy for the identification of effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.
Gates 1 and 2Gate 3Gate 4Gate 5Gate 6Gate 7Gate 8Subset
Live single
CD3+
CD14
CD19 lymphocytes
CD4+Exclude
CCR7+
CD45RA+
CD25high
CD127low
Treg
CD25low
CD127+
CXCR5+Tfh
CCR10+Th22
CXCR5
CCR10
CXCR3+
CCR6
CCR4Th1
CXCR3
CCR6+
CCR4+Th17
CXCR3+
CCR6+
CCR4Th1-17
CXCR3
CCR6
CCR4+
CRTh2
Th2
CCR4+
CRTh2+
Th2a
Table 2
Frequencies of sorted effector/memory CD4T-cell subsets.
DonorTfhTh1Th1-17Th17Th22Th2aTh2Treg
D15.441.911.443.062.601.044.863.99
D25.823.293.503.146.641.539.246.92
D32.050.190.311.310.810.261.931.84
D46.702.332.114.222.020.577.193.95
D54.391.161.173.322.120.823.963.99
Mean4.881.781.713.012.840.845.444.14
SD1.791.171.191.062.230.482.841.81
  1. Shown as % of live CD3+CD4+CD14CD19 non-naive cells. Details in Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Table 3
Frequencies of sorted naive CD4T-cell subsets.
DonorTh1-like
CCR4CXCR3+
Th2-like
CCR4+CXCR3
CCR4
CXCR3
CCR4+
CXCR3+
Treg CD25high
CD127low
D11.755.4644.800.230.73
D20.776.7720.400.320.57
D30.155.6742.600.191.70
D40.166.3333.100.051.11
  1. Shown as % of live CD3+CD4+CD8CD14CD19 naive cells. Details in Figure 6—figure supplement 2.

Author response table 1
propertycolumn usedcompare tosubsetp adjusted (BH method)psigniftestp adjusted (BH method)psigniftest
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Th25.1e-010.43258nsT-test0.6000.4481nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Tfh2.4e-010.14003nsT-test0.3700.2333nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Th2a7.4e-010.72099nsT-test0.7700.7726nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Th14.3e-010.34963nsT-test0.7700.7451nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Th1-179.2e-020.03070*T-test0.2500.0829nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.TREG4.3e-010.34053nsT-test0.6000.4481nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Th177.5e-010.75446nsT-test0.6700.5633nsWilcoxon
cdr3_lengthzscore.all.Th221.1e-010.04145*T-test0.1200.0171*Wilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Th23.1e-010.21194nsT-test0.3300.1935nsWilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Tfh1.4e-010.07180nsT-test0.3300.1699nsWilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Th2a3.7e-010.26285nsT-test0.3300.1935nsWilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Th12.6e-010.16583nsT-test0.5400.3860nsWilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Th1-172.2e-020.00365**T-test0.1200.0251*Wilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.TREG1.1e-010.04517*T-test0.3100.1485nsWilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Th177.4e-010.70804nsT-test0.6700.5633nsWilcoxon
added_nucleotideszscore.all.Th227.6e-020.01900*T-test0.0730.0060**Wilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Th21.1e-020.00135**T-test0.1600.0362*Wilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Tfh1.8e-067.3e-08****T-test0.0490.0021**Wilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Th2a4.3e-010.34108nsT-test0.4700.3118nsWilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Th13.9e-010.28682nsT-test0.6100.4700nsWilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Th1-172.6e-010.16136nsT-test0.3700.2333nsWilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.TREG1.5e-020.00219**T-test0.3100.1386nsWilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Th171.0e-020.00104**T-test0.3100.1292nsWilcoxon
strengthzscore.all.Th221.0e-010.03680*T-test0.1900.0556nsWilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Th29.2e-020.03016*T-test0.1200.0251*Wilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Tfh2.0e-061.3e-07****T-test0.0490.0019**Wilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Th2a2.4e-010.14789nsT-test0.3300.1935nsWilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Th11.2e-010.05902nsT-test0.6700.5392nsWilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Th1-175.5e-020.01270*T-test0.3100.1485nsWilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.TREG3.1e-010.21607nsT-test0.4300.2785nsWilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Th171.1e-010.04722*T-test0.3300.1814nsWilcoxon
surfacezscore.all.Th221.6e-010.08850nsT-test0.1900.0603nsWilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Th25.5e-020.01168*T-test0.1200.0208*Wilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Tfh4.6e-030.00039***T-test0.1200.0229*Wilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Th2a7.8e-020.02114*T-test0.3100.1485nsWilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Th11.4e-010.06982nsT-test0.3100.1120nsWilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Th1-171.2e-010.05435nsT-test0.1900.0603nsWilcoxon
volumezscore.all.TREG5.3e-010.46185nsT-test0.6700.6131nsWilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Th172.3e-010.13201nsT-test0.4800.3294nsWilcoxon
volumezscore.all.Th223.8e-020.00721**T-test0.1200.0140*Wilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Th26.3e-010.56570nsT-test0.7700.7726nsWilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Tfh3.5e-077.3e-09****T-test0.0490.0031**Wilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Th2a6.3e-010.57609nsT-test0.6800.6387nsWilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Th15.0e-010.41381nsT-test0.6700.6131nsWilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Th1-174.3e-010.32935nsT-test0.6700.5879nsWilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.TREG9.2e-020.02848*T-test0.1700.0431*Wilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Th171.2e-010.05305nsT-test0.3100.1386nsWilcoxon
kf4zscore.all.Th227.1e-010.66248nsT-test0.6700.5879nsWilcoxon

Additional files

Download links