1. Neuroscience

Activation of astrocytes in hippocampus decreases fear memory through adenosine A1 receptors

  1. Yulan Li
  2. Lixuan Li
  3. Jintao Wu
  4. Zhenggang Zhu
  5. Xiang Feng
  6. Liming Qin
  7. Yuwei Zhu
  8. Zilong Qiu
  9. Shumin Duan  Is a corresponding author
  10. Yan-Qin Yu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
  2. Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57155
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Yulan Li
  2. Lixuan Li
  3. Jintao Wu
  4. Zhenggang Zhu
  5. Xiang Feng
  6. Liming Qin
  7. Yuwei Zhu
  8. Zilong Qiu
  9. Shumin Duan
  10. Yan-Qin Yu
(2020)
Activation of astrocytes in hippocampus decreases fear memory through adenosine A1 receptors
eLife 9:e57155.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57155
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Astrocytes respond to and regulate neuronal activity, yet their role in mammalian behavior remains incompletely understood. Especially unclear is whether, and if so how, astrocyte activity regulates contextual fear memory, the dysregulation of which leads to pathological fear-related disorders. We generated GFAP-ChR2-EYFP rats to allow the specific activation of astrocytes in vivo by optogenetics. We found that after memory acquisition within a temporal window, astrocyte activation disrupted memory consolidation and persistently decreased contextual but not cued fear memory accompanied by reduced fear-related anxiety behavior. In vivo microdialysis experiments showed astrocyte photoactivation increased extracellular ATP and adenosine concentrations. Intracerebral blockade of adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) reversed the attenuation of fear memory. Furthermore, intracerebral or intraperitoneal injection of A1R agonist mimicked the effects of astrocyte activation. Therefore, our findings provide a deeper understanding of the astrocyte-mediated regulation of fear memory, and suggest a new and important therapeutic strategy against pathological fear-related disorders.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all manuscript figures.Source data has been provided online at datadryad.org https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p8cz8w9mc

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yulan Li

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Lixuan Li

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Jintao Wu

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Zhenggang Zhu

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Xiang Feng

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Liming Qin

    Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Yuwei Zhu

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Zilong Qiu

    Institute of Neuroscience, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Shumin Duan

    Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    duanshumin@zju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Yan-Qin Yu

    Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology of Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    yanqinyu@zju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4378-5931

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC1306700)

  • Yan-Qin Yu

The National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFA0501000)

  • Shumin Duan

The National Natural Science Fundation of China (31970939,31771167,31571090)

  • Yan-Qin Yu

The National Natural Science Fundation of China (81527901,81821091,31490592)

  • Shumin Duan

The Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2018PT31041)

  • Shumin Duan

Science and technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2018B030331001)

  • Shumin Duan

Science and technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2018B030331001)

  • Yan-Qin Yu

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitues (2019FZA7009)

  • Shumin Duan
  • Yan-Qin Yu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Advisory Committee at Zhejiang University (2019-2#) and were performed in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (2006-398#). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2020, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,067
    views
  • 1,041
    downloads
  • 65
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yulan Li
  2. Lixuan Li
  3. Jintao Wu
  4. Zhenggang Zhu
  5. Xiang Feng
  6. Liming Qin
  7. Yuwei Zhu
  8. Zilong Qiu
  9. Shumin Duan
  10. Yan-Qin Yu
(2020)
Activation of astrocytes in hippocampus decreases fear memory through adenosine A1 receptors
eLife 9:e57155.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57155

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57155

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Basolateral amygdala oscillations enable fear learning in a biophysical model

    Anna Cattani, Don B Arnold ... Nancy Kopell
    Research Article

    The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is a key site where fear learning takes place through synaptic plasticity. Rodent research shows prominent low theta (~3–6 Hz), high theta (~6–12 Hz), and gamma (>30 Hz) rhythms in the BLA local field potential recordings. However, it is not understood what role these rhythms play in supporting the plasticity. Here, we create a biophysically detailed model of the BLA circuit to show that several classes of interneurons (PV, SOM, and VIP) in the BLA can be critically involved in producing the rhythms; these rhythms promote the formation of a dedicated fear circuit shaped through spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Each class of interneurons is necessary for the plasticity. We find that the low theta rhythm is a biomarker of successful fear conditioning. The model makes use of interneurons commonly found in the cortex and, hence, may apply to a wide variety of associative learning situations.

    1. Neuroscience

    Introducing µGUIDE for quantitative imaging via generalized uncertainty-driven inference using deep learning

    Maëliss Jallais, Marco Palombo
    Research Article

    This work proposes µGUIDE: a general Bayesian framework to estimate posterior distributions of tissue microstructure parameters from any given biophysical model or signal representation, with exemplar demonstration in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Harnessing a new deep learning architecture for automatic signal feature selection combined with simulation-based inference and efficient sampling of the posterior distributions, µGUIDE bypasses the high computational and time cost of conventional Bayesian approaches and does not rely on acquisition constraints to define model-specific summary statistics. The obtained posterior distributions allow to highlight degeneracies present in the model definition and quantify the uncertainty and ambiguity of the estimated parameters.

    1. Neuroscience

    Brain-derived and in vitro-seeded alpha-synuclein fibrils exhibit distinct biophysical profiles

    Selene Seoyun Lee, Livia Civitelli, Laura Parkkinen
    Research Article

    The alpha-synuclein (αSyn) seeding amplification assay (SAA) that allows the generation of disease-specific in vitro seeded fibrils (SAA fibrils) is used as a research tool to study the connection between the structure of αSyn fibrils, cellular seeding/spreading, and the clinicopathological manifestations of different synucleinopathies. However, structural differences between human brain-derived and SAA αSyn fibrils have been recently highlighted. Here, we characterize the biophysical properties of the human brain-derived αSyn fibrils from the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia (PD, PDD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and compare them to the ‘model’ SAA fibrils. We report that the brain-derived αSyn fibrils show distinct biochemical profiles, which were not replicated in the corresponding SAA fibrils. Furthermore, the brain-derived αSyn fibrils from all synucleinopathies displayed a mixture of ‘straight’ and ‘twisted’ microscopic structures. However, the PD, PDD, and DLB SAA fibrils had a ’straight’ structure, whereas MSA SAA fibrils showed a ‘twisted’ structure. Finally, the brain-derived αSyn fibrils from all four synucleinopathies were phosphorylated (S129). Interestingly, phosphorylated αSyn were carried over to the PDD and DLB SAA fibrils. Our findings demonstrate the limitation of the SAA fibrils modeling the brain-derived αSyn fibrils and pay attention to the necessity of deepening the understanding of the SAA fibrillation methodology.