PreBötzinger complex neurons drive respiratory modulation of blood pressure and heart rate

  1. Clément Menuet  Is a corresponding author
  2. Angela A Connelly
  3. Jaspreet K Bassi
  4. Mariana R Melo
  5. Sheng Le
  6. Jessica Kamar
  7. Natasha N Kumar
  8. Stuart J McDougall
  9. Simon McMullan
  10. Andrew M Allen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, France
  2. University of Melbourne, Australia
  3. Macquarie University, Australia
  4. University of New South Wales, Australia
  5. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Australia

Abstract

Heart rate and blood pressure oscillate in phase with respiratory activity. A component of these oscillations is generated centrally, with respiratory neurons entraining the activity of pre-sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular neurons. Using a combination of optogenetic inhibition and excitation in vivo and in situ in rats, as well as neuronal tracing, we demonstrate that preBötzinger Complex (preBötC) neurons, which form the kernel for inspiratory rhythm generation, directly modulate cardiovascular activity. Specifically, inhibitory preBötC neurons modulate cardiac parasympathetic neuron activity whilst excitatory preBötC neurons modulate sympathetic vasomotor neuron activity, generating heart rate and blood pressure oscillations in phase with respiration. Our data reveal yet more functions entrained to the activity of the preBötC, with a role in generating cardiorespiratory oscillations. The findings have implications for cardiovascular pathologies, such as hypertension and heart failure, where respiratory entrainment of heart rate is diminished and respiratory entrainment of blood pressure exaggerated.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data and statistics files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Clément Menuet

    INSERM U1249, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
    For correspondence
    clement.menuet@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7419-6427
  2. Angela A Connelly

    Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jaspreet K Bassi

    Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mariana R Melo

    Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sheng Le

    Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie University, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jessica Kamar

    Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Natasha N Kumar

    Department of Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stuart J McDougall

    Systems Neurophysiology, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8778-675X
  9. Simon McMullan

    Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie University, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew M Allen

    Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
    For correspondence
    a.allen@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2183-5360

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (App #1120477)

  • Clément Menuet
  • Simon McMullan
  • Andrew M Allen

National Health and Medical Research Council (App #1156727)

  • Clément Menuet
  • Simon McMullan
  • Andrew M Allen

Australian Research Council (DP120100920)

  • Simon McMullan
  • Andrew M Allen

Australian Research Council (DP170104582)

  • Andrew M Allen

University of Melbourne (-McKenzie Research Fellowship)

  • Clément Menuet

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (Fellowship ARF20160936221)

  • Clément Menuet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Muriel Thoby-Brisson, CNRS Université de Bordeaux, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were conducted in accordance with the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 'Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes' and were approved by the University of Melbourne Animal Research Ethics and Biosafety Committees (ethics ID #1413273, #1614009, #1814599 and Florey 16-040).

Version history

  1. Received: March 26, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 14, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 15, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 30, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Menuet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,572
    views
  • 578
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Clément Menuet
  2. Angela A Connelly
  3. Jaspreet K Bassi
  4. Mariana R Melo
  5. Sheng Le
  6. Jessica Kamar
  7. Natasha N Kumar
  8. Stuart J McDougall
  9. Simon McMullan
  10. Andrew M Allen
(2020)
PreBötzinger complex neurons drive respiratory modulation of blood pressure and heart rate
eLife 9:e57288.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57288

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57288

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

    1. Neuroscience
    Emilio Salinas, Bashirul I Sheikh
    Insight

    Our ability to recall details from a remembered image depends on a single mechanism that is engaged from the very moment the image disappears from view.