Sex-specific effects of cooperative breeding and colonial nesting on prosociality in corvids

  1. Lisa Horn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Thomas Bugnyar
  3. Michael Griesser
  4. Marietta Hengl
  5. Ei-Ichi Izawa
  6. Tim Oortwijn
  7. Christiane Rössler
  8. Clara Scheer
  9. Martina Schiestl
  10. Masaki Suyama
  11. Alex H Taylor
  12. Lisa-Claire Vanhooland
  13. Auguste M P von Bayern
  14. Yvonne Zürcher
  15. Jorg JM Massen
  1. University of Vienna, Austria
  2. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  3. Keio University, Japan
  4. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Germany
  5. Hokkaido University, Japan
  6. University of Auckland, New Zealand
  7. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany
  8. Zurich University, Switzerland
  9. Utrecht University, Netherlands

Abstract

The investigation of prosocial behavior is of particular interest from an evolutionary perspective. Comparisons of prosociality across non-human animal species have, however, so far largely focused on primates, and their interpretation is hampered by the diversity of paradigms and procedures used. Here we present the first systematic comparison of prosocial behavior across multiple species in a taxonomic group outside the primate order, namely the bird family Corvidae. We measured prosociality in 8 corvid species, which vary in the expression of cooperative breeding and colonial nesting. We show that cooperative breeding is positively associated with prosocial behavior across species. Also, colonial nesting is associated with a stronger propensity for prosocial behavior, but only in males. The combined results of our study strongly suggest that both cooperative breeding and colonial nesting, which may both rely on heightened social tolerance at the nest, are likely evolutionary pathways to prosocial behavior in corvids.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed in this study are available on Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lisa Horn

    Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    lisa.horn@univie.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9586-915X
  2. Thomas Bugnyar

    Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Griesser

    Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2220-2637
  4. Marietta Hengl

    Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ei-Ichi Izawa

    Department of Psychology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tim Oortwijn

    Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christiane Rössler

    Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Clara Scheer

    Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Martina Schiestl

    Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Masaki Suyama

    Department of Behavioral Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Alex H Taylor

    School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Lisa-Claire Vanhooland

    Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Auguste M P von Bayern

    Research Group Comparative Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yvonne Zürcher

    Department of Anthropology, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jorg JM Massen

    Animal Ecology Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P26806)

  • Jorg JM Massen

JST CREST (JPMJCR17A4)

  • Ei-Ichi Izawa

Keio University ICR Projects (MKJ1905)

  • Ei-Ichi Izawa

Royal Society of New Zealand (Rutherford Discovery Fellowship)

  • Alex H Taylor

Prime Minister's McDiarmid Emerging Scientist Prize

  • Alex H Taylor

University of Vienna (Marie Jahoda grant)

  • Lisa Horn

Austrian Science Fund (Y366-B17)

  • Thomas Bugnyar

Vienna Science and Technology Fund (CS11-008)

  • Thomas Bugnyar

ERA-Net BiodivERsA (31BD30_172465)

  • Michael Griesser

University of Vienna (Förderungsstipendium)

  • Marietta Hengl
  • Christiane Rössler

University of Vienna (Uni:Docs doctoral fellowship)

  • Lisa-Claire Vanhooland

JSPS KAKENHI (17H02653)

  • Ei-Ichi Izawa

JSPS KAKENHI (16H06324)

  • Ei-Ichi Izawa

JSPS KAKENHI (15J02148)

  • Masaki Suyama

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ammie K Kalan, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The study followed the Guidelines for the Use of Animals (81), in accordance with national legislations. All animal care and data collection protocols were reviewed and approved by the ethical boards of the respective research institutions (see SI, Table S7).

Version history

  1. Received: April 22, 2020
  2. Accepted: October 18, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 20, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 3, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Horn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,618
    views
  • 295
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lisa Horn
  2. Thomas Bugnyar
  3. Michael Griesser
  4. Marietta Hengl
  5. Ei-Ichi Izawa
  6. Tim Oortwijn
  7. Christiane Rössler
  8. Clara Scheer
  9. Martina Schiestl
  10. Masaki Suyama
  11. Alex H Taylor
  12. Lisa-Claire Vanhooland
  13. Auguste M P von Bayern
  14. Yvonne Zürcher
  15. Jorg JM Massen
(2020)
Sex-specific effects of cooperative breeding and colonial nesting on prosociality in corvids
eLife 9:e58139.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58139

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58139

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Xueyou Li, William V Bleisch ... Xue-Long Jiang
    Research Article

    Spatial and temporal associations between sympatric species underpin biotic interactions, structure ecological assemblages, and sustain ecosystem functioning and stability. However, the resilience of interspecific spatiotemporal associations to human activity remains poorly understood, particularly in mountain forests where anthropogenic impacts are often pervasive. Here, we applied context-dependent Joint Species Distribution Models to a systematic camera-trap survey dataset from a global biodiversity hotspot in eastern Himalayas to understand how prominent human activities in mountain forests influence species associations within terrestrial mammal communities. We obtained 10,388 independent detections of 17 focal species (12 carnivores and five ungulates) from 322 stations over 43,163 camera days of effort. We identified a higher incidence of positive associations in habitats with higher levels of human modification (87%) and human presence (83%) compared to those located in habitats with lower human modification (64%) and human presence (65%) levels. We also detected a significant reduction of pairwise encounter time at increasing levels of human disturbance, corresponding to more frequent encounters between pairs of species. Our findings indicate that human activities can push mammals together into more frequent encounters and associations, which likely influences the coexistence and persistence of wildlife, with potential far-ranging ecological consequences.

    1. Ecology
    Lan Pang, Gangqi Fang ... Jianhua Huang
    Research Article

    The success of an organism depends on the molecular and ecological adaptations that promote its beneficial fitness. Parasitoids are valuable biocontrol agents for successfully managing agricultural pests, and they have evolved diversified strategies to adapt to both the physiological condition of hosts and the competition of other parasitoids. Here, we deconstructed the parasitic strategies in a highly successful parasitoid, Trichopria drosophilae, which parasitizes a broad range of Drosophila hosts, including the globally invasive species D. suzukii. We found that T. drosophilae had developed specialized venom proteins that arrest host development to obtain more nutrients via secreting tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), as well as a unique type of cell—teratocytes—that digest host tissues for feeding by releasing trypsin proteins. In addition to the molecular adaptations that optimize nutritional uptake, this pupal parasitoid has evolved ecologically adaptive strategies including the conditional tolerance of intraspecific competition to enhance parasitic success in older hosts and the obligate avoidance of interspecific competition with larval parasitoids. Our study not only demystifies how parasitoids weaponize themselves to colonize formidable hosts but also provided empirical evidence of the intricate coordination between the molecular and ecological adaptations that drive evolutionary success.