Tumor stiffening reversion through collagen crosslinking inhibition improves T cell migration and anti-PD-1 treatment

  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  2. Javier Vaquero
  3. Lene Vimeux
  4. Thomas Guilbert
  5. Sarah Barrin
  6. Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  7. Matteo Ponzo
  8. Gilles Renault
  9. Piotr Deptula
  10. Katarzyna Pogoda
  11. Robert Bucki
  12. Ilaria Cascone
  13. José Courty
  14. Laura Fouassier
  15. Florence Gazeau  Is a corresponding author
  16. Emmanuel Donnadieu  Is a corresponding author
  1. INSERM, France
  2. INSERM U1016, France
  3. Institut Cochin - Inserm U1016-CNRS UMR8104-Université Paris Descartes, France
  4. CRRET laboratory, France
  5. Medical University of Białystok, Poland
  6. Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
  7. Université de Paris, France

Abstract

Only a fraction of cancer patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors. This may be partly due to the dense extracellular matrix (ECM) that forms a barrier for T cells. Comparing 5 preclinical mouse tumor models with heterogeneous tumor microenvironments, we aimed to relate the rate of tumor stiffening with the remodeling of ECM architecture and to determine how these features affect intratumoral T cell migration. An ECM-targeted strategy, based on the inhibition of lysyl oxidase (LOX) was used. In vivo stiffness measurements were found to be strongly correlated with tumor growth and ECM crosslinking but negatively correlated with T cell migration. Interfering with collagen stabilization reduces ECM content and tumor stiffness leading to improved T cell migration and increased efficacy of anti-PD-1 blockade. This study highlights the rationale of mechanical characterizations in solid tumors to understand resistance to immunotherapy and of combining treatment strategies targeting the ECM with anti-PD-1 therapy.

Data availability

Relevant source data for all figures and supplement figures have been uploaded as Excel files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Javier Vaquero

    Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lene Vimeux

    INSERM U1016, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thomas Guilbert

    Cell Biology of Host Pathogens Interactions, Institut Cochin - Inserm U1016-CNRS UMR8104-Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sarah Barrin

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Matteo Ponzo

    University of Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC), CRRET laboratory, CRETEIL, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gilles Renault

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Piotr Deptula

    Department of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Katarzyna Pogoda

    Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert Bucki

    Department of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ilaria Cascone

    University of Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC), CRRET laboratory, CRETEIL, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. José Courty

    University of Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC), CRRET laboratory, CRETEIL, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Laura Fouassier

    Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6377-5610
  15. Florence Gazeau

    Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes, Université de Paris, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    florence.gazeau@u-paris.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Emmanuel Donnadieu

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    emmanuel.donnadieu@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4985-7254

Funding

Ligue Contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisée)

  • Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  • Lene Vimeux
  • Sarah Barrin
  • Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  • Emmanuel Donnadieu

Institut National Du Cancer (Program HTE)

  • Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  • Lene Vimeux
  • Sarah Barrin
  • Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  • Emmanuel Donnadieu

European Commission (685795)

  • Florence Gazeau

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (11-IDEX-0004-02)

  • Javier Vaquero

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in agreement with institutional animal use and care regulations after approval by the animal experimentation ethics committee of Paris Descartes University (CEEA 34, 16-063).

Copyright

© 2021, Nicolas-Boluda et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,802
    views
  • 1,115
    downloads
  • 160
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  2. Javier Vaquero
  3. Lene Vimeux
  4. Thomas Guilbert
  5. Sarah Barrin
  6. Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  7. Matteo Ponzo
  8. Gilles Renault
  9. Piotr Deptula
  10. Katarzyna Pogoda
  11. Robert Bucki
  12. Ilaria Cascone
  13. José Courty
  14. Laura Fouassier
  15. Florence Gazeau
  16. Emmanuel Donnadieu
(2021)
Tumor stiffening reversion through collagen crosslinking inhibition improves T cell migration and anti-PD-1 treatment
eLife 10:e58688.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58688

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58688

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jeffrey Barr, Austin Walz ... Paola D Vermeer
    Research Article

    Cancer patients often experience changes in mental health, prompting an exploration into whether nerves infiltrating tumors contribute to these alterations by impacting brain functions. Using a mouse model for head and neck cancer and neuronal tracing, we show that tumor-infiltrating nerves connect to distinct brain areas. The activation of this neuronal circuitry altered behaviors (decreased nest-building, increased latency to eat a cookie, and reduced wheel running). Tumor-infiltrating nociceptor neurons exhibited heightened calcium activity and brain regions receiving these neural projections showed elevated Fos as well as increased calcium responses compared to non-tumor-bearing counterparts. The genetic elimination of nociceptor neurons decreased brain Fos expression and mitigated the behavioral alterations induced by the presence of the tumor. While analgesic treatment restored nesting and cookie test behaviors, it did not fully restore voluntary wheel running indicating that pain is not the exclusive driver of such behavioral shifts. Unraveling the interaction between the tumor, infiltrating nerves, and the brain is pivotal to developing targeted interventions to alleviate the mental health burdens associated with cancer.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Samarjit Jana, Mainak Mondal ... Kumaravel Somasundaram
    Research Article

    In tumors with WT p53, alternate mechanisms of p53 inactivation are reported. Here, we have identified a long noncoding RNA, PITAR (p53 Inactivating TRIM28 Associated RNA), as an inhibitor of p53. PITAR is an oncogenic Cancer/testis lncRNA and is highly expressed in glioblastoma (GBM) and glioma stem-like cells (GSC). We establish that TRIM28 mRNA, which encodes a p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a direct target of PITAR. PITAR interaction with TRIM28 RNA stabilized TRIM28 mRNA, which resulted in increased TRIM28 protein levels and reduced p53 steady-state levels due to enhanced p53 ubiquitination. DNA damage activated PITAR, in addition to p53, in a p53-independent manner, thus creating an incoherent feedforward loop to inhibit the DNA damage response by p53. While PITAR silencing inhibited the growth of WT p53 containing GSCs in vitro and reduced glioma tumor growth in vivo, its overexpression enhanced the tumor growth in a TRIM28-dependent manner and promoted resistance to Temozolomide. Thus, we establish an alternate way of p53 inactivation by PITAR, which maintains low p53 levels in normal cells and attenuates the DNA damage response by p53. Finally, we propose PITAR as a potential GBM therapeutic target.