Tumor stiffening reversion through collagen crosslinking inhibition improves T cell migration and anti-PD-1 treatment

  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  2. Javier Vaquero
  3. Lene Vimeux
  4. Thomas Guilbert
  5. Sarah Barrin
  6. Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  7. Matteo Ponzo
  8. Gilles Renault
  9. Piotr Deptula
  10. Katarzyna Pogoda
  11. Robert Bucki
  12. Ilaria Cascone
  13. José Courty
  14. Laura Fouassier
  15. Florence Gazeau  Is a corresponding author
  16. Emmanuel Donnadieu  Is a corresponding author
  1. INSERM, France
  2. INSERM U1016, France
  3. Institut Cochin - Inserm U1016-CNRS UMR8104-Université Paris Descartes, France
  4. CRRET laboratory, France
  5. Medical University of Białystok, Poland
  6. Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
  7. Université de Paris, France

Abstract

Only a fraction of cancer patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors. This may be partly due to the dense extracellular matrix (ECM) that forms a barrier for T cells. Comparing 5 preclinical mouse tumor models with heterogeneous tumor microenvironments, we aimed to relate the rate of tumor stiffening with the remodeling of ECM architecture and to determine how these features affect intratumoral T cell migration. An ECM-targeted strategy, based on the inhibition of lysyl oxidase (LOX) was used. In vivo stiffness measurements were found to be strongly correlated with tumor growth and ECM crosslinking but negatively correlated with T cell migration. Interfering with collagen stabilization reduces ECM content and tumor stiffness leading to improved T cell migration and increased efficacy of anti-PD-1 blockade. This study highlights the rationale of mechanical characterizations in solid tumors to understand resistance to immunotherapy and of combining treatment strategies targeting the ECM with anti-PD-1 therapy.

Data availability

Relevant source data for all figures and supplement figures have been uploaded as Excel files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Javier Vaquero

    Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lene Vimeux

    INSERM U1016, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thomas Guilbert

    Cell Biology of Host Pathogens Interactions, Institut Cochin - Inserm U1016-CNRS UMR8104-Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sarah Barrin

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Matteo Ponzo

    University of Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC), CRRET laboratory, CRETEIL, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gilles Renault

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Piotr Deptula

    Department of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Katarzyna Pogoda

    Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert Bucki

    Department of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ilaria Cascone

    University of Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC), CRRET laboratory, CRETEIL, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. José Courty

    University of Paris-Est Creteil (UPEC), CRRET laboratory, CRETEIL, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Laura Fouassier

    Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6377-5610
  15. Florence Gazeau

    Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes, Université de Paris, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    florence.gazeau@u-paris.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Emmanuel Donnadieu

    Institut Cochin, INSERM, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    emmanuel.donnadieu@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4985-7254

Funding

Ligue Contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisée)

  • Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  • Lene Vimeux
  • Sarah Barrin
  • Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  • Emmanuel Donnadieu

Institut National Du Cancer (Program HTE)

  • Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  • Lene Vimeux
  • Sarah Barrin
  • Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  • Emmanuel Donnadieu

European Commission (685795)

  • Florence Gazeau

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (11-IDEX-0004-02)

  • Javier Vaquero

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in agreement with institutional animal use and care regulations after approval by the animal experimentation ethics committee of Paris Descartes University (CEEA 34, 16-063).

Copyright

© 2021, Nicolas-Boluda et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,161
    views
  • 1,165
    downloads
  • 175
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda
  2. Javier Vaquero
  3. Lene Vimeux
  4. Thomas Guilbert
  5. Sarah Barrin
  6. Chahrazade Kantari-Mimoun
  7. Matteo Ponzo
  8. Gilles Renault
  9. Piotr Deptula
  10. Katarzyna Pogoda
  11. Robert Bucki
  12. Ilaria Cascone
  13. José Courty
  14. Laura Fouassier
  15. Florence Gazeau
  16. Emmanuel Donnadieu
(2021)
Tumor stiffening reversion through collagen crosslinking inhibition improves T cell migration and anti-PD-1 treatment
eLife 10:e58688.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58688

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58688

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Simei Go, Constantinos Demetriou ... Eric O Neill
    Research Article

    The immunosuppressive microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prevents tumor control and strategies to restore anti-cancer immunity (i.e. by increasing CD8 T-cell activity) have had limited success. Here, we demonstrate how inducing localized physical damage using ionizing radiation (IR) unmasks the benefit of immunotherapy by increasing tissue-resident natural killer (trNK) cells that support CD8 T activity. Our data confirms that targeting mouse orthotopic PDAC tumors with IR together with CCR5 inhibition and PD1 blockade reduces E-cadherin positive tumor cells by recruiting a hypoactive NKG2D-ve NK population, phenotypically reminiscent of trNK cells, that supports CD8 T-cell involvement. We show an equivalent population in human single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) PDAC cohorts that represents immunomodulatory trNK cells that could similarly support CD8 T-cell levels in a cDC1-dependent manner. Importantly, a trNK signature associates with survival in PDAC and other solid malignancies revealing a potential beneficial role for trNK in improving adaptive anti-tumor responses and supporting CCR5 inhibitor (CCR5i)/αPD1 and IR-induced damage as a novel therapeutic approach.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Hyungtai Sim, Hyun Jung Park ... Murim Choi
    Research Article

    Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) allows estimation of clonal dynamics and documentation of somatic mutations in the hematopoietic system. Recent studies utilizing large cohorts of the general population and patients have revealed significant associations of CHIP burden with age and disease status, including in cancer and chronic diseases. An increasing number of cancer patients are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the association of ICI response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with CHIP burden remains to be determined. We collected blood samples from 100 metastatic NSCLC patients before and after ICI for high-depth sequencing of the CHIP panel and 63 samples for blood single-cell RNA sequencing. Whole exome sequencing was performed in an independent replication cohort of 180 patients. The impact of CHIP status on the immunotherapy response was not significant. However, metastatic lung cancer patients showed higher CHIP prevalence (44/100 for patients vs. 5/42 for controls; p = 0.01). In addition, lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) patients showed increased burden of larger clones compared to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients (8/43 for LUSC vs. 2/50 for LUAD; p = 0.04). Furthermore, single-cell RNA-seq analysis of the matched patients showed significant enrichment of inflammatory pathways mediated by NF-κB in myeloid clusters of the severe CHIP group. Our findings suggest minimal involvement of CHIP mutation and clonal dynamics during immunotherapy but a possible role of CHIP as an indicator of immunologic response in NSCLC patients.