Cold-induced hyperphagia requires AgRP-neuron activation in mice

  1. Jennifer Deem
  2. Chelsea L Faber
  3. Christian Pedersen
  4. Bao Anh Phan
  5. Sarah A Larsen
  6. Kayoko Ogimoto
  7. Jarrell T Nelson
  8. Vincent Damian
  9. Megan A Tran
  10. Richard D Palmiter
  11. Karl J Kaiyala
  12. Jarrad M Scarlett
  13. Michael Bruchas
  14. Michael W Schwartz
  15. Gregory J Morton  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Washington, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, United States
  3. Seattle Children's Hospital, United States

Abstract

To maintain energy homeostasis during cold exposure, the increased energy demands of thermogenesis must be counterbalanced by increased energy intake. To investigate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this cold-induced hyperphagia, we asked whether agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons are activated when animals are placed in a cold environment and, if so, whether this response is required for the associated hyperphagia. We report that AgRP-neuron activation occurs rapidly upon acute cold exposure, as do increases of both energy expenditure and energy intake, suggesting the mere perception of cold is sufficient to engage each of these responses. We further report that silencing of AgRP neurons selectively blocks the effect of cold exposure to increase food intake but has no effect on energy expenditure. Together, these findings establish a physiologically important role for AgRP neurons in the hyperphagic response to cold exposure.

Data availability

Photometry data has been deposited in DryadDOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf208Individual source data files are associated with individual figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jennifer Deem

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8865-5145
  2. Chelsea L Faber

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4812-8164
  3. Christian Pedersen

    Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bao Anh Phan

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sarah A Larsen

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kayoko Ogimoto

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jarrell T Nelson

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vincent Damian

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Megan A Tran

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Richard D Palmiter

    Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6587-0582
  11. Karl J Kaiyala

    Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jarrad M Scarlett

    Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Michael Bruchas

    Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4713-7816
  14. Michael W Schwartz

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1619-0331
  15. Gregory J Morton

    Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    gjmorton@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8106-8386

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DK089056)

  • Gregory J Morton

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM095421)

  • Chelsea L Faber

National Institutes of Health (T32 HL007028)

  • Jennifer Deem

Diabetes Research Center

  • Jennifer Deem

American Diabetes Association (ADA 1-19-PDF-103)

  • Jennifer Deem

National Institutes of Health (DK083042)

  • Michael W Schwartz

National Institutes of Health (DK101997)

  • Michael W Schwartz

National Institutes of Health (R37 DA033396)

  • Michael Bruchas

National Institutes of Health (R01DA24908)

  • Richard D Palmiter

National Institutes of Health (P30 DA048736)

  • Michael Bruchas

National Institutes of Health (DK035816)

  • Gregory J Morton

Diabetes Research Center (DK17047)

  • Gregory J Morton

National Institutes of Health (F31 DK113673)

  • Chelsea L Faber

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen Liberles, Harvard Medical School, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to a protocol approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) of the University of Washington (#2456-06). All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: May 10, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 14, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 15, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 26, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Deem et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,927
    views
  • 450
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jennifer Deem
  2. Chelsea L Faber
  3. Christian Pedersen
  4. Bao Anh Phan
  5. Sarah A Larsen
  6. Kayoko Ogimoto
  7. Jarrell T Nelson
  8. Vincent Damian
  9. Megan A Tran
  10. Richard D Palmiter
  11. Karl J Kaiyala
  12. Jarrad M Scarlett
  13. Michael Bruchas
  14. Michael W Schwartz
  15. Gregory J Morton
(2020)
Cold-induced hyperphagia requires AgRP-neuron activation in mice
eLife 9:e58764.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58764

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58764

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Josue M Regalado, Ariadna Corredera Asensio ... Priyamvada Rajasethupathy
    Research Article

    Learning requires the ability to link actions to outcomes. How motivation facilitates learning is not well understood. We designed a behavioral task in which mice self-initiate trials to learn cue-reward contingencies and found that the anterior cingulate region of the prefrontal cortex (ACC) contains motivation-related signals to maximize rewards. In particular, we found that ACC neural activity was consistently tied to trial initiations where mice seek to leave unrewarded cues to reach reward-associated cues. Notably, this neural signal persisted over consecutive unrewarded cues until reward-associated cues were reached, and was required for learning. To determine how ACC inherits this motivational signal we performed projection-specific photometry recordings from several inputs to ACC during learning. In doing so, we identified a ramp in bulk neural activity in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-to-ACC projections as mice received unrewarded cues, which continued ramping across consecutive unrewarded cues, and finally peaked upon reaching a reward-associated cue, thus maintaining an extended motivational state. Cellular resolution imaging of OFC confirmed these neural correlates of motivation, and further delineated separate ensembles of neurons that sequentially tiled the ramp. Together, these results identify a mechanism by which OFC maps out task structure to convey an extended motivational state to ACC to facilitate goal-directed learning.

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.