SWELL1 regulates skeletal muscle cell size, intracellular signalling, adiposity and glucose metabolism

  1. Ashutosh Kumar
  2. Litao Xie
  3. Chau My Ta
  4. Antentor J Hinton
  5. Susheel K Gunasekar
  6. Rachel A Minerath
  7. Karen Shen
  8. Joshua M Maurer
  9. Chad E Grueter
  10. E Dale Abel
  11. Gretchen Meyer
  12. Rajan Sah  Is a corresponding author
  1. Washington University, United States
  2. Washington University School of Medicine, United States
  3. University of Iowa, United States

Abstract

Maintenance of skeletal muscle is beneficial in obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Mechanical stimulation can regulate skeletal muscle differentiation, growth and metabolism, however the molecular mechanosensor remains unknown. Here, we show that SWELL1 (Lrrc8a) functionally encodes a swell-activated anion channel that regulates PI3K-AKT, ERK1/2, mTOR signaling, muscle differentiation, myoblast fusion, cellular oxygen consumption, and glycolysis in skeletal muscle cells. LRRC8A over-expression in Lrrc8a KO myotubes boosts PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling to supra-normal levels and fully rescues myotube formation. Skeletal muscle targeted Lrrc8a KO mice have smaller myofibers, generate less force ex vivo, and exhibit reduced exercise endurance, associated with increased adiposity under basal conditions, and glucose intolerance and insulin resistance when raised on a high-fat diet, compared to WT mice. These results reveal that the LRRC8 complex regulates insulin-PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling in skeletal muscle to influence skeletal muscle differentiation in vitro and skeletal myofiber size, muscle function, adiposity and systemic metabolism in vivo.

Data availability

We have uploaded the RNA sequencing data file in GEO (accession code: Series GSE156667 )

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ashutosh Kumar

    Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Litao Xie

    Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chau My Ta

    Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Antentor J Hinton

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa city, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Susheel K Gunasekar

    Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rachel A Minerath

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Division of Cardiology, University of Iowa, Iowa city, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Karen Shen

    Program in Physical Therapy and Departments of Neurology, Biomedical Engineering and Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joshua M Maurer

    Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Chad E Grueter

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center,Division of Cardiology, University of Iowa, Iowa city, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. E Dale Abel

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5290-0738
  11. Gretchen Meyer

    Program in Physical Therapy and Departments of Neurology, Biomedical Engineering and Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rajan Sah

    Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    rajan.sah@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1092-1244

Funding

National Institutes of Health (1R01DK106009)

  • Rajan Sah

National Institutes of Health (R01HL125436)

  • Chad E Grueter

National Institutes of Health (RO1HL127764)

  • E Dale Abel

National Institutes of Health (RO1HL112413)

  • E Dale Abel

National Institutes of Health (1P30AR074992-01)

  • Rajan Sah

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Muthu Periasamy

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to the approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of Washington University in St. Louis (20180217) and the University of Iowa (1308148).

Version history

  1. Received: May 14, 2020
  2. Accepted: September 7, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 15, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: September 28, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: October 7, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Kumar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,854
    views
  • 578
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ashutosh Kumar
  2. Litao Xie
  3. Chau My Ta
  4. Antentor J Hinton
  5. Susheel K Gunasekar
  6. Rachel A Minerath
  7. Karen Shen
  8. Joshua M Maurer
  9. Chad E Grueter
  10. E Dale Abel
  11. Gretchen Meyer
  12. Rajan Sah
(2020)
SWELL1 regulates skeletal muscle cell size, intracellular signalling, adiposity and glucose metabolism
eLife 9:e58941.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58941

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58941

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Lucie Crhak Khaitova, Pavlina Mikulkova ... Karel Riha
    Research Article

    Heat stress is a major threat to global crop production, and understanding its impact on plant fertility is crucial for developing climate-resilient crops. Despite the known negative effects of heat stress on plant reproduction, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of elevated temperature on centromere structure and chromosome segregation during meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Consistent with previous studies, heat stress leads to a decline in fertility and micronuclei formation in pollen mother cells. Our results reveal that elevated temperature causes a decrease in the amount of centromeric histone and the kinetochore protein BMF1 at meiotic centromeres with increasing temperature. Furthermore, we show that heat stress increases the duration of meiotic divisions and prolongs the activity of the spindle assembly checkpoint during meiosis I, indicating an impaired efficiency of the kinetochore attachments to spindle microtubules. Our analysis of mutants with reduced levels of centromeric histone suggests that weakened centromeres sensitize plants to elevated temperature, resulting in meiotic defects and reduced fertility even at moderate temperatures. These results indicate that the structure and functionality of meiotic centromeres in Arabidopsis are highly sensitive to heat stress, and suggest that centromeres and kinetochores may represent a critical bottleneck in plant adaptation to increasing temperatures.