Contribution of dorsal horn CGRP-expressing interneurons to mechanical sensitivity

  1. Line S Löken  Is a corresponding author
  2. Joao M Braz
  3. Alexander Etlin
  4. Mahsa Sadeghi
  5. Mollie Bernstein
  6. Madison Jewell
  7. Marilyn Steyert
  8. Julia Kuhn
  9. Katherine Hamel
  10. Ida J Llewellyn-Smith
  11. Allan Basbaum  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. University of California San Francisco, United States
  3. Flinders University, Australia

Abstract

Primary sensory neurons are generally considered the only source of dorsal horn calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide critical to the transmission of pain messages. Using a tamoxifen-inducible CalcaCreER transgenic mouse, here we identified a distinct population of CGRP-expressing excitatory interneurons in lamina III of the spinal cord dorsal horn and trigeminal nucleus caudalis. These interneurons have spine-laden, dorsally-directed, dendrites and ventrally-directed axons. As under resting conditions, CGRP interneurons are under tonic inhibitory control, neither innocuous nor noxious stimulation provoked significant Fos expression in these neurons. However, synchronous, electrical non-nociceptive Aβ primary afferent stimulation of dorsal roots depolarized the CGRP interneurons, consistent with their receipt of a VGLUT1 innervation. On the other hand, chemogenetic activation of the neurons produced a mechanical hypersensitivity in response to von Frey stimulation whereas their caspase-mediated ablation led to mechanical hyposensitivity. Finally, after partial peripheral nerve injury, innocuous stimulation (brush) induced significant Fos expression in the CGRP interneurons. These findings suggest that CGRP interneurons become hyperexcitable and contribute either to ascending circuits originating in deep dorsal horn or to the reflex circuits in baseline conditions, but not in the setting of nerve injury.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data file is available for figure 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Line S Löken

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    linesofieloken@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6762-9717
  2. Joao M Braz

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Alexander Etlin

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mahsa Sadeghi

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9769-4082
  5. Mollie Bernstein

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Madison Jewell

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Marilyn Steyert

    Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Julia Kuhn

    Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Katherine Hamel

    Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Ida J Llewellyn-Smith

    Cardiovascular Medicine and Human Physiology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4269-6846
  11. Allan Basbaum

    Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    allan.basbaum@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    Allan Basbaum, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1710-6333

Funding

Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship (092208/Z/10/Z)

  • Line S Löken

Ake Wiberg Foundation

  • Line S Löken

NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (R35NS097306)

  • Allan Basbaum

Wellcome Trust (A102645)

  • Allan Basbaum

Open Philanthropy Project

  • Allan Basbaum

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were housed in cages on a standard 12:12 hour light/dark cycle with food and water ad libitum. Permission for all animal experiments was obtained and overseen by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California San Francisco. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Ethical approval number: AN183265; expires Feb. 26, 2023.

Copyright

© 2021, Löken et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,817
    views
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Line S Löken
  2. Joao M Braz
  3. Alexander Etlin
  4. Mahsa Sadeghi
  5. Mollie Bernstein
  6. Madison Jewell
  7. Marilyn Steyert
  8. Julia Kuhn
  9. Katherine Hamel
  10. Ida J Llewellyn-Smith
  11. Allan Basbaum
(2021)
Contribution of dorsal horn CGRP-expressing interneurons to mechanical sensitivity
eLife 10:e59751.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59751

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59751

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Akanksha Bafna, Gareth Banks ... Patrick M Nolan
    Research Article

    The mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), situated in the ventral hypothalamus, directs daily cellular and physiological rhythms across the body. The SCN clockwork is a self-sustaining transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) that in turn coordinates the expression of clock-controlled genes (CCGs) directing circadian programmes of SCN cellular activity. In the mouse, the transcription factor, ZFHX3 (zinc finger homeobox-3), is necessary for the development of the SCN and influences circadian behaviour in the adult. The molecular mechanisms by which ZFHX3 affects the SCN at transcriptomic and genomic levels are, however, poorly defined. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing to map the genomic localization of ZFHX3-binding sites in SCN chromatin. To test for function, we then conducted comprehensive RNA sequencing at six distinct times-of-day to compare the SCN transcriptional profiles of control and ZFHX3-conditional null mutants. We show that the genome-wide occupancy of ZFHX3 occurs predominantly around gene transcription start sites, co-localizing with known histone modifications, and preferentially partnering with clock transcription factors (CLOCK, BMAL1) to regulate clock gene(s) transcription. Correspondingly, we show that the conditional loss of ZFHX3 in the adult has a dramatic effect on the SCN transcriptome, including changes in the levels of transcripts encoding elements of numerous neuropeptide neurotransmitter systems while attenuating the daily oscillation of the clock TF Bmal1. Furthermore, various TTFL genes and CCGs exhibited altered circadian expression profiles, consistent with an advanced in daily behavioural rhythms under 12 h light–12 h dark conditions. Together, these findings reveal the extensive genome-wide regulation mediated by ZFHX3 in the central clock that orchestrates daily timekeeping in mammals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Myrthe Faber, Koen V Haak
    Insight

    Untangling the functional organisation of a brain region crucial for memory and learning helps reveal how individual differences are linked to variations in recall ability, aging and dopamine receptor distribution.