Chimpanzee brain morphometry utilizing standardized MRI preprocessing and macroanatomical annotations

  1. Sam Vickery  Is a corresponding author
  2. William D Hopkins
  3. Chet C Sherwood
  4. Steven J Schapiro
  5. Robert D Latzman
  6. Svenja Caspers
  7. Christian Gaser
  8. Simon B Eickhoff
  9. Robert Dahnke  Is a corresponding author
  10. Felix Hoffstaedter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Research Centre Jülich, Germany
  2. MD Anderson Center, United States
  3. The George Washington University, United States
  4. Georgia State University, United States
  5. University of Jena, Germany
  6. Jena University Hospital, Germany

Abstract

Chimpanzees are among the closest living relatives to humans and, as such, provide a crucial comparative model for investigating primate brain evolution. In recent years, human brain mapping has strongly benefited from enhanced computational models and image processing pipelines that could also improve data analyses in animals by using species-specific templates. In this study, we use structural MRI data from the National Chimpanzee Brain Resource (NCBR) to develop the chimpanzee brain reference template Juna.Chimp for spatial registration and the macro-anatomical brain parcellation Davi130 for standardized whole-brain analysis. Additionally, we introduce a ready-to-use image processing pipeline built upon the CAT12 toolbox in SPM12, implementing a standard human image preprocessing framework in chimpanzees. Applying this approach to data from 194 subjects, we find strong evidence for human-like age-related gray matter atrophy in multiple regions of the chimpanzee brain, as well as, a general rightward asymmetry in brain regions.

Data availability

The T1-weighted MRI's can are available at the National Chimpanzee Brain Resource Website as well as the direct-to-download dataset we used for our example workflow.The code used in the manuscript can be found at this GitHub repo https://github.com/viko18/JunaChimp

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sam Vickery

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    For correspondence
    s.vickery@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6732-7014
  2. William D Hopkins

    MD Anderson Center, Bastrop, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chet C Sherwood

    Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6711-449X
  4. Steven J Schapiro

    MD Anderson Center, Bastrop, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Robert D Latzman

    Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1175-8090
  6. Svenja Caspers

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christian Gaser

    University of Jena, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Simon B Eickhoff

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6363-2759
  9. Robert Dahnke

    Department of Neurolgy; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
    For correspondence
    robert.dahnke@uni-jena.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Felix Hoffstaedter

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    For correspondence
    f.hoffstaedter@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7163-3110

Funding

Helmholtz Association (Helmholtz Portfolio Theme 'Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain)

  • Sam Vickery
  • Simon B Eickhoff
  • Felix Hoffstaedter

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (417649423)

  • Robert Dahnke

European Commission Horizon 2020 (945539 (HBP SGA 3))

  • Sam Vickery
  • Simon B Eickhoff
  • Felix Hoffstaedter

Helmholtz Association (Initiative and Networking Fund)

  • Svenja Caspers

European Commission Horizon 2020 (785907 (HBP SGA 2))

  • Svenja Caspers

National Institutes of Health (NS-42867,NS-73134,NS-92988)

  • William D Hopkins

National Institutes of Health (NS092988)

  • Chet C Sherwood

James S. McDonnell Foundation (220020293)

  • Chet C Sherwood

Inspire Foundation (SMA-1542848)

  • Chet C Sherwood

National Institutes of Health (U42-OD011197)

  • Steven J Schapiro

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The chimpanzee imaging data were acquired under protocols approved by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center (YNPRC) at Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval number YER2001206).

Copyright

© 2020, Vickery et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,150
    views
  • 230
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sam Vickery
  2. William D Hopkins
  3. Chet C Sherwood
  4. Steven J Schapiro
  5. Robert D Latzman
  6. Svenja Caspers
  7. Christian Gaser
  8. Simon B Eickhoff
  9. Robert Dahnke
  10. Felix Hoffstaedter
(2020)
Chimpanzee brain morphometry utilizing standardized MRI preprocessing and macroanatomical annotations
eLife 9:e60136.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60136

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60136

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yi-Yun Ho, Qiuwei Yang ... Melissa R Warden
    Research Article

    The infralimbic cortex (IL) is essential for flexible behavioral responses to threatening environmental events. Reactive behaviors such as freezing or flight are adaptive in some contexts, but in others a strategic avoidance behavior may be more advantageous. IL has been implicated in avoidance, but the contribution of distinct IL neural subtypes with differing molecular identities and wiring patterns is poorly understood. Here, we study IL parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in mice as they engage in active avoidance behavior, a behavior in which mice must suppress freezing in order to move to safety. We find that activity in inhibitory PV neurons increases during movement to avoid the shock in this behavioral paradigm, and that PV activity during movement emerges after mice have experienced a single shock, prior to learning avoidance. PV neural activity does not change during movement toward cued rewards or during general locomotion in the open field, behavioral paradigms where freezing does not need to be suppressed to enable movement. Optogenetic suppression of PV neurons increases the duration of freezing and delays the onset of avoidance behavior, but does not affect movement toward rewards or general locomotion. These data provide evidence that IL PV neurons support strategic avoidance behavior by suppressing freezing.

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance Updated

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.