Doxycycline has distinct apicoplast-specific mechanisms of antimalarial activity

  1. Megan Okada
  2. Ping Guo
  3. Shai-anne Nalder
  4. Paul A Sigala  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Doxycycline (DOX) is a key antimalarial drug thought to kill Plasmodium parasites by blocking protein translation in the essential apicoplast organelle. Clinical use is primarily limited to prophylaxis due to delayed second-cycle parasite death at 1–3 µM serum concentrations. DOX concentrations > 5 µM kill parasites with first-cycle activity but are thought to involve off-target mechanisms outside the apicoplast. We report that 10 µM DOX blocks apicoplast biogenesis in the first cycle and is rescued by isopentenyl pyrophosphate, an essential apicoplast product, confirming an apicoplast-specific mechanism. Exogenous iron rescues parasites and apicoplast biogenesis from first- but not second-cycle effects of 10 µM DOX, revealing that first-cycle activity involves a metal-dependent mechanism distinct from the delayed-death mechanism. These results critically expand the paradigm for understanding the fundamental antiparasitic mechanisms of DOX and suggest repurposing DOX as a faster acting antimalarial at higher dosing whose multiple mechanisms would be expected to limit parasite resistance.

Introduction

Malaria remains a serious global health problem, with hundreds of thousands of annual deaths due to Plasmodium falciparum parasites. The absence of a potent, long-lasting vaccine and parasite tolerance to frontline artemisinin combination therapies continue to challenge malaria elimination efforts. Furthermore, there are strong concerns that the current COVID-19 pandemic will disrupt malaria prevention and treatment efforts in Africa and cause a surge in malaria deaths that unravels decades of progress (Weiss et al., 2020). Deeper understanding of basic parasite biology and the mechanisms of current drugs will guide their optimal use for malaria prevention and treatment and facilitate development of novel therapies to combat parasite drug resistance.

Tetracycline antibiotics like DOX are thought to kill eukaryotic P. falciparum parasites by inhibiting prokaryotic-like 70S ribosomal translation inside the essential apicoplast organelle (Figure 1; Dahl et al., 2006). Although stable P. falciparum resistance to DOX has not been reported, clinical use is largely limited to prophylaxis due to delayed activity against intraerythrocytic infection (Conrad and Rosenthal, 2019; Gaillard et al., 2015). Parasites treated with 1–3 µM DOX, the drug concentration sustained in human serum with current 100–200 mg dosage (Newton et al., 2005), continue to grow for 72–96 hr and only die after the second 48 hr intraerythrocytic growth cycle when they fail to expand into a third cycle (Dahl et al., 2006). Slow antiparasitic activity is believed to be a fundamental limitation of DOX and other antibiotics that block apicoplast-maintenance pathways (Gaillard et al., 2015; Dahl and Rosenthal, 2007). First-cycle anti-Plasmodium activity has been reported for DOX and azithromycin concentrations > 3 µM, but such activities have been ascribed to targets outside the apicoplast (Dahl et al., 2006; Yeh and DeRisi, 2011; Wilson et al., 2015). A more incisive understanding of the mechanisms and parameters that govern first versus second-cycle DOX activity can inform and improve clinical use of this valuable antibiotic for antimalarial treatment. We therefore set out to test and unravel the mechanisms and apicoplast specificity of first-cycle DOX activity.

Scheme of intraerythrocytic P. falciparum parasite depicting doxycycline, its canonical delayed-death mechanism at 1 µM inhibiting apicoplast genome translation, the novel metal-dependent mechanism(s) in the apicoplast explored herein at 10 µM, and off-target activity outside the apicoplast at >20 µM.

Results

First-cycle activity by 10 µM DOX has an apicoplast-specific mechanism

Prior studies have shown that 200 µM isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), an essential apicoplast product, rescues parasites from the delayed-death activity of 1–3 µM DOX, confirming an apicoplast-specific target (Yeh and DeRisi, 2011). To provide a baseline for comparison, we first used continuous-growth and 48 hr growth-inhibition assays to confirm that IPP rescued parasites from 1 µM DOX (Figure 2A) and that DOX concentrations > 5 µM killed parasites with first-cycle activity (Figure 2A-C and Figure 2—figure supplement 1) as previously reported (Dahl et al., 2006). To test the apicoplast specificity of first-cycle DOX activity, we next asked whether 200 µM IPP could rescue parasites from DOX concentrations > 5 µM. We observed that IPP shifted the 48 hr EC50 value of DOX from 5 ± 1 to 12 ± 2 µM (average ± SD of five independent assays, p=0.001 by two-tailed unpaired t-test) (Figure 2C and Figure 2—figure supplement 1), suggesting that first-cycle growth defects from 5 to 10 µM DOX reflect an apicoplast-specific mechanism but that DOX concentrations > 10 µM cause off-target defects outside this organelle. We further tested this conclusion using continuous growth assays performed at constant DOX concentrations. We observed that IPP fully or nearly fully rescued parasites from first-cycle growth inhibition by 10 µM but not 20 or 40 µM Dox (Figure 2A and D and Figure 2—figure supplement 1). On the basis of IPP rescue, we conclude that 10 µM DOX kills P. falciparum with first-cycle activity by an apicoplast-specific mechanism.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
10 µM doxycycline kills P. falciparum with first-cycle, apicoplast-specific activity.

(A) Continuous growth assay of synchronized Dd2 parasites treated with 1 or 10 µM DOX ±200 µM IPP with (B) Giemsa-stained blood smears for days 1–3. (C) 48 hr growth-inhibition curve for DOX-treated Dd2 parasites ± 200 µM IPP. (D) Continuous growth assay of synchronized Dd2 parasites treated with 10–40 µM DOX and 200 µM IPP. (E) Epifluorescence images of synchronized parasites treated as rings with 10 µM DOX ±200 µM IPP and imaged 36 or 65 hr later (green = ACPL GFP, blue = nuclear Hoechst stain). Data points in growth assays are the average ± SD of two to four biological replicates. All growth assays were independently repeated two to four times using different batches of blood (shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

10 µM DOX blocks apicoplast biogenesis in the first cycle

Inhibition of apicoplast biogenesis in the second intraerythrocytic cycle is a hallmark of 1–3 µM DOX-treated P. falciparum, resulting in unviable parasite progeny that fail to inherit the organelle (Dahl et al., 2006). IPP rescues parasite viability after the second cycle without rescuing apicoplast inheritance, such that third-cycle daughter parasites lack the organelle and accumulate apicoplast-targeted proteins in cytoplasmic vesicles (Yeh and DeRisi, 2011). We treated synchronized ring-stage D10 (Waller et al., 2000) or NF54 (Swift et al., 2020) parasites expressing the acyl carrier protein leader sequence fused to GFP (ACPL-GFP) with 10 µM DOX and assessed apicoplast morphology 30–36 hr later in first-cycle schizonts. In contrast to the second-cycle effects of 1–3 µM DOX, the apicoplast in 10 µM DOX-treated parasites failed to elongate in the first cycle. Rescue by 200 µM IPP produced second-cycle parasite progeny with a dispersed GFP signal indicative of apicoplast loss (Figure 2E and Figure 2—figure supplement 2). We conclude that 10 µM DOX blocks apicoplast biogenesis in the first cycle.

First- and second-cycle effects of DOX on the apicoplast are due to distinct mechanisms

What is the molecular mechanism of faster apicoplast-specific activity by 10 µM DOX? We first considered the model that both 1 and 10 µM DOX inhibit apicoplast translation but that 10 µM DOX kills parasites faster due to more stringent translation inhibition at higher drug concentrations. This model predicts that treating parasites simultaneously with multiple distinct apicoplast-translation inhibitors, each added at a delayed death-inducing concentration, will produce additive, accelerated activity that kills parasites in the first cycle. To test this model, we treated synchronized D10 parasites with combinatorial doses of 2 µM DOX, 2 µM clindamycin, and 500 nM azithromycin and monitored growth over three intraerythrocytic cycles. Treatment with each antibiotic alone produced major growth defects at the end of the second cycle, as expected for delayed-death activity at these concentrations (Dahl and Rosenthal, 2007). Two- and three-way drug combinations caused growth defects that were indistinguishable from individual treatments and provided no evidence for additive, first-cycle activity (Figure 3A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These results contradict a simple model that 1 and 10 µM DOX act via a common translation-blocking mechanism and suggest that the first-cycle activity of 10 µM DOX is due to a distinct mechanism.

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all
10 µM DOX kills P. falciparum with a first-cycle, metal-dependent mechanism.

Continuous growth assays of synchronized Dd2 parasites treated with (A) DOX, clindamycin (CLI), and/or azithromycin (AZM) and (B) 10 µM DOX and 10 µM ZnCl2 or 500 µM CaCl2. (C) 48 hr growth inhibition assay of D10 parasites treated with DOX without or with 500 µM FeCl3 or CaCl2. (D) Continuous growth assay of synchronized Dd2 parasites treated with 10 µM DOX and 500 µM FeCl3 or MgCl2. (E) Epifluorescence images of synchronized parasites treated as rings with 10 µM DOX ±500 µM FeCl3 or CaCl2 and imaged 36 hr later (green = ACPL GFP, blue = nuclear Hoechst stain). (F) Continuous growth assay of synchronized Dd2 parasites treated with 1 µM DOX and 500 µM FeCl3 or MgCl2. (G) Continuous-growth assay of synchronized Dd2 parasites treated with 20 or 40 µM DOX and 500 µM FeCl3. Data points in growth assays are the average ± SD of two to four biological replicates. All growth assays were independently repeated using different batches of blood (shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1).

Exogenous iron rescues parasites from first- but not second-cycle effects of 10 µM DOX

Tetracycline antibiotics like DOX tightly chelate a wide variety of di- and trivalent metal ions via their siderophore-like arrangement of exocyclic hydroxyl and carbonyl oxygen atoms (Figure 1), with a reported affinity series of Fe3+>Fe2+>Zn2+>Mg2+>Ca2+ (Albert and Rees, 1956; Nelson, 1998). Indeed, tetracycline interactions with Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions mediate cellular uptake and binding to biomolecular targets such as the tetracycline repressor and 16S rRNA (Nelson, 1998; Orth et al., 2000). We next considered a model that first-cycle effects of 10 µM DOX reflect a metal-dependent mechanism distinct from ribosomal inhibition causing second-cycle death. To test this model, we investigated whether exogenous metals rescued parasites from 10 µM DOX. We failed to observe growth rescue by 10 µM ZnCl2 (toxicity limit [Marvin et al., 2012]) or 500 µM CaCl2 in continuous-growth (Figure 3B and Figure 3—figure supplement 1) or 48 hr growth-inhibition assays (Figure 3C). In contrast, 500 µM FeCl3 (and to a lesser extent 500 µM MgCl2) fully or nearly fully rescued parasites from first-cycle growth inhibition by 10 µM DOX (Figure 3C and D), although partial rescue was observed at FeCl3 concentrations as low as 50 µM (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). However, parasites treated with 10 µM DOX and 500 µM FeCl3 still succumbed to second-cycle, delayed death (Figure 3D and Figure 3—figure supplement 1), as expected for distinct mechanisms of first- and second-cycle DOX activity.

We also observed that 500 µM FeCl3 but not CaCl2 rescued first-cycle apicoplast-branching in 10 µM DOX (Figure 3E and Figure 3—figure supplement 2). These observations contrast with IPP, which rescued parasite viability in 10 µM DOX but did not restore apicoplast branching (Figure 2E). We further noted that FeCl3 selectively rescued parasites from the apicoplast-specific, first-cycle growth effects of 10 µM DOX but did not rescue parasites from the second-cycle effects of 1 µM DOX (Figure 3F) or the off-target effects of 20–40 µM DOX (Figure 3G and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). We conclude that 10 µM DOX kills parasites via a metal-dependent, first-cycle mechanism that blocks apicoplast biogenesis and is distinct from the second-cycle, delayed-death mechanism of 1 µM DOX.

Discussion

Metal-dependent mechanisms of first-cycle activity by 10 µM DOX

What is the metal-dependent mechanism of 10 µM DOX, and why is there preferential rescue of parasite growth by FeCl3? Tetracyclines bind iron more tightly than other metals, with an equilibrium association constant of 1010 M−1 for 1:1 chelation of Fe3+ versus 104 M−1 for Mg2+ (Albert and Rees, 1956). Although the 500 µM concentration of exogenous FeCl3 required for maximal rescue of parasite growth in 10 µM DOX is large relative to the ~1 µM labile iron concentration estimated for the parasite cytoplasm (Scholl et al., 2005), the intracellular iron concentration achieved by exogenous addition of 500 µM FeCl3 remains unclear. Indeed, mechanisms of iron uptake and trafficking by blood-stage P. falciparum remain sparsely understood (Scholl et al., 2005; Mabeza et al., 1999), especially uptake across the four membranes that surround the apicoplast.

We first considered whether exogenous FeCl3 might selectively rescue parasites from 10 µM DOX by blocking or reducing its uptake into the parasite apicoplast, since metal chelation has been reported to influence the cellular uptake of tetracycline antibiotics in other organisms (Nelson, 1998). However, 500 µM FeCl3 or MgCl2 did not rescue second-cycle parasite death in continuous growth assays with 10 µM (Figure 3D) or 1 µM DOX (Figure 3F). Furthermore, exogenous iron resulted in only a small, 1.5 µM shift in EC50 value from 0.5 to 2 µM in a 96 hr growth inhibition assay, in contrast to the 10.5 µM shift provided by IPP (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These results strongly suggest that DOX uptake into the apicoplast is not substantially perturbed by exogenous iron. The inability of 500 µM FeCl3 to rescue parasites from first-cycle activity by ≥20 µM DOX (Figure 3G) further suggests that general uptake of DOX into parasites is not substantially affected by exogenous iron.

We propose two distinct models to explain the metal-dependent effects of 10 µM DOX, both of which could contribute to apicoplast-specific activity. First, DOX could directly bind and sequester labile iron within the apicoplast, reducing its bioavailability for Fe-S cluster biogenesis and other essential iron-dependent processes in this organelle. Indeed, prior work has shown that apicoplast biogenesis requires Fe-S cluster synthesis apart from known essential roles in isoprenoid biosynthesis (Gisselberg et al., 2013). In this first model, rescue by exogenous FeCl3 would be due to restoration of iron bioavailability, while modest rescue by 500 µM MgCl2 may reflect competitive displacement of DOX-bound iron to restore iron bioavailability. RPMI growth medium already contains ~400 µM Mg2+ prior to supplementation with an addition 500 µM MgCl2, and thus Mg2+ availability is unlikely to be directly limited by 10 µM DOX. Consistent with a general mechanism that labile-iron chelation can block apicoplast biogenesis, we observed in preliminary studies that Plasmodium growth inhibited by the highly specific iron chelator, deferoxamine (DFO) (Mabeza et al., 1999), could be partially rescued by IPP, fully rescued by exogenous FeCl3, and involved a first-cycle defect in apicoplast elongation (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Development of targeted and incisive probes of labile iron within subcellular compartments remains an ongoing challenge in biology (Breuer et al., 2008), especially in the Plasmodium apicoplast where iron uptake, concentration, and utilization remain sparsely understood. To more broadly evaluate the impact of DOX on iron availability in the apicoplast, we are developing protein-based probes of lipoic acid and isoprenoid biosynthesis, as these two apicoplast-dependent processes require Fe/S-cluster biosynthesis for activity (Gisselberg et al., 2013).

In a second model, DOX could bind to additional macromolecular targets within the apicoplast (e.g. a metalloenzyme) via metal-dependent interactions that inhibit essential functions required for organelle biogenesis. Exogenous 500 µM Fe3+ would then rescue parasites by disrupting these inhibitory interactions via competitive binding to DOX. This second model would be mechanistically akin to diketo acid inhibitors of HIV integrase like raltegravir that bind to active site Mg2+ ions to inhibit integrase activity but are displaced by exogenous metals (Grobler et al., 2002; Hare et al., 2010). To test this model, we are developing a DOX-affinity reagent to identify apicoplast targets that interact with doxycycline and whose inhibition may contribute to first-cycle DOX activity.

Conclusions and implications

These results critically expand the paradigm for understanding the fundamental mechanisms of DOX activity against P. falciparum malaria parasites. These mechanisms include a delayed, second-cycle defect at 1–3 µM DOX that likely reflects inhibition of 70S apicoplast ribosomes, a first-cycle iron-dependent defect within the apicoplast that uniquely operates at 8–10 µM DOX, and a first-cycle iron-independent mechanism outside the apicoplast at ≥20 µM DOX (Figure 1). Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that current 100–200 mg doses of DOX achieve peak human serum concentrations of 6–8 µM over the first six hours which then decrease to 1–2 µM over 24 hr (Newton et al., 2005). Although current DOX treatment regimens result in delayed parasite clearance in vivo, both apicoplast-specific mechanisms of DOX likely operate over this concentration range and contribute to parasite death (Dahl et al., 2006). These multiple mechanisms of DOX, together with limited antimalarial use of DOX in the field, may explain why parasites with stable DOX resistance have not emerged (Conrad and Rosenthal, 2019; Gaillard et al., 2015).

There has been a prevailing view in the literature that delayed-death activity is a fundamental limitation of antibiotics like DOX that block apicoplast maintenance (Ramya et al., 2007; Kennedy et al., 2019). Our results emphasize that DOX is not an intrinsically slow-acting antimalarial drug and support the emerging paradigm (Boucher and Yeh, 2019; Amberg-Johnson et al., 2017; Uddin et al., 2018) that inhibition of apicoplast biogenesis can defy the delayed-death phenotype to kill parasites on a faster time-scale. The first-cycle, iron-dependent impacts of 10 µM DOX or 15 µM DFO on apicoplast biogenesis also suggest that this organelle may be especially susceptible to therapeutic strategies that interfere with acquisition and utilization of iron, perhaps due to limited uptake of exogenous iron and/or limited iron storage mechanisms in the apicoplast.

Finally, this work suggests the possibility of repurposing DOX as a faster-acting antiparasitic treatment at higher dosing, whose multiple mechanisms would be expected to limit parasite resistance. Prior studies indicate that 500–600 mg doses in humans achieve sustained serum DOX concentrations ≥ 5 µM for 24–48 hr with little or no increase in adverse effects (Marlin and Cheng, 1979; Adadevoh et al., 1976). DOX is currently contraindicated for long-term prophylaxis in pregnant women and young children, two of the major at-risk populations for malaria, due to concerns about impacts on fetal development and infant tooth discoloration, respectively, based on observed toxicities for other tetracyclines (Gaillard et al., 2018). Recent studies suggest that these effects are not associated with short-term DOX use (Gaillard et al., 2018; Todd et al., 2015; Cross et al., 2016), and additional tests can define the safety parameters that would govern short-term use of DOX for treatment in these populations. Recent development of tetracycline derivatives with improved activities may provide another option to deploy this important class of antibiotics for antimalarial treatment (Draper et al., 2013).

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional
information
Cell line (Plasmodium falciparum)Dd2PMID:1970614
Cell line (Plasmodium falciparum)D10
ACPL-GFP
PMID:10775264
Cell line (Plasmodium falciparum)NF54-PfMev
ACPL-GFP
PMID:32059044
Software, algorithmPrism 8GraphPadRRID:SCR_002798
Chemical compound, drugDoxycyclineSigma-AldrichCat. No. D3447
Chemical compound, drugIsopentenyl pyrophosphateIsoprenoidsCat. No. IPP001
Chemical compound, drugFerric chlorideSigma-AldrichCat. No. 236489
Chemical compound, drugClindamycinSigma-AldrichCat. No. C6427
Chemical compound, drugAzithromycinSigma-AldrichCat. No. 75199
Chemical compound, drugDeferoxamineSigma-AldrichCat. No. D9533

Materials

All reagents were cell-culture grade and/or of the highest purity available.

Parasite culture

Request a detailed protocol

All experiments were performed using Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 (Wellems et al., 1990), ACPL-GFP D10 (Waller et al., 2000), or ACPL-GFP PfMev NF54 (Swift et al., 2020) parasite strains, which were obtained from colleagues and verified by confirming their expected drug sensitivity and/or sequencing strain-specific genetic markers. Parasite culturing was performed as previously described (Sigala et al., 2015) in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI-1640, Thermo Fisher 23400021) supplemented with 2.5 g/L Albumax I Lipid-Rich BSA (Thermo Fisher 11020039), 15 mg/L hypoxanthine (Sigma H9636), 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate (Sigma P5280), 1.19 g/L HEPES (Sigma H4034), 2.52 g/L sodium bicarbonate (Sigma S5761), 2 g/L glucose (Sigma G7021), and 10 mg/L gentamicin (Invitrogen Life Technologies 15750060). Cultures were maintained at 2% hematocrit in human erythrocytes obtained from the University of Utah Hospital blood bank, at 37°C, and at 5% O2, 5% CO2, 90% N2. Cultures were mycoplasma-free by PCR test.

Parasite growth assays

Request a detailed protocol

All growth assays were performed with two to four biological replicates (defined according to Blainey et al., 2014) in distinct sample wells that were set-up and monitored in parallel. Parasites were synchronized to the ring stage either by treatment with 5% D-sorbitol (Sigma S7900) or by first magnet-purifying schizonts and then incubating them with uninfected erythrocytes for 5 hr followed by treatment with 5% D-sorbitol. Results from growth assays using either of these synchronization methods were indistinguishable within error, and 5% sorbitol was used for synchronization unless stated otherwise.

For continuous growth assays, parasite growth was monitored by diluting sorbitol-synchronized parasites to ~0.5% starting parasitemia, adding additional treatments (antibiotics, IPP, and/or metal salts) at assay initiation, and allowing culture expansion over several days with daily media changes. Growth assays with doxycycline (Sigma D3447), clindamycin (Sigma C6427), and azithromycin (Sigma 75199) were conducted at 0.2% DMSO at the indicated final drug concentration. Growth assays with ZnCl2 (Sigma 208086), CaCl2 (Sigma C4901), MgCl2 (M8266), FeCl3 (Sigma 236489), deferoxamine (Sigma D9533), and/or IPP (NH4+ salt, Isoprenoids IPP001) were conducted at the indicated final concentrations. Parasitemia was monitored daily by flow cytometry by diluting 10 µl of each parasite culture well from 2 to 3 biological replicates into 200 µl of 1.0 µg/ml acridine orange (Invitrogen Life Technologies A3568) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and analysis on a BD FACSCelesta system monitoring SSC-A, FSC-A, PE-A, FITC-A, and PerCP-Cy5-5-A channels.

For EC50 determinations via dose-response assay, synchronous ring-stage parasites were diluted to 1% parasitemia and incubated with variable (serially twofold diluted) DOX concentrations ± 200 µM IPP,±50 µM mevalonate (Cayman 20348), ±500 µM FeCl3, or ±500 µM CaCl2 for 48–120 hr without media changes. Parasitemia was determined by flow cytometry for two to four biological replicates for each untreated or drug-treated condition, normalized to the parasitemia in the absence of drug, plotted as the average ± SD of biological replicates as a function of the log of the drug concentration (in µM), and fit to a four-parameter dose-response model using GraphPad Prism 8.0. All growth assays were independently repeated two to five times on different weeks and in different batches of blood. The 48 hr EC50 values determined from five independent assays for DOX ±IPP were averaged and analyzed by unpaired t-test using GraphPad Prism 8.0.

Fluorescence microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

For live-cell experiments, parasites samples were collected at 30–36 or 65 hr after synchronization with magnet purification plus sorbitol treatment (see above). Imaging experiments were independently repeated twice. Parasite nuclei were visualized by incubating samples with 1–2 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Scientific Pierce 62249) for 10–20 min at room temperature. The parasite apicoplast was visualized in D10 (Waller et al., 2000) or NF54 mevalonate-bypass (Swift et al., 2020) cells using the ACPleader-GFP expressed by both lines. Images were taken on DIC/brightfield, DAPI, and GFP channels using either a Zeiss Axio Imager or an EVOS M5000 imaging system. Fiji/ImageJ was used to process and analyze images. All image adjustments, including contrast and brightness, were made on a linear scale. For indicated conditions, apicoplast morphologies in 20–40 total parasites were scored as elongated, focal, or dispersed; counted; and plotted by histogram as the fractional population with the indicated morphology. Analysis of replicate samples indicated standard errors of the mean that were ≤15% for all samples in the percentage of parasites displaying a given apicoplast morphology in a given condition. Two-tailed unpaired t-test analysis using GraphPad Prism was used to evaluate the significance of observed population differences.

Data availability

All data reported or described in this manuscript are available and included in the main and supplemental figures and in the microscopy source data file.

References

    1. Breuer W
    2. Shvartsman M
    3. Cabantchik ZI
    (2008) Intracellular labile iron
    The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 40:350–354.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.03.010

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Megan Okada

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation, Visualization, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  2. Ping Guo

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3023-779X
  3. Shai-anne Nalder

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Paul A Sigala

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    p.sigala@biochem.utah.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3464-3042

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007115)

  • Megan Okada

National Heart and Lung Institute (R25HL108828)

  • Shai-anne Nalder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK110858)

  • Paul A Sigala

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1011969)

  • Paul A Sigala

Pew Charitable Trusts (32099)

  • Paul A Sigala

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133764)

  • Paul A Sigala

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jeremy Burrows, Dan Goldberg, Don Granger, Daria Hazuda, Jerry Kaplan, Sean Prigge, Dennis Winge and members of the Sigala lab for helpful discussions. PAS holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund and a Pew Biomedical Scholarship from the Pew Charitable Trusts. Microscopy and flow cytometry were performed using core facilities at the University of Utah.

Version history

  1. Received: June 21, 2020
  2. Accepted: November 1, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 16, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Okada et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,057
    Page views
  • 289
    Downloads
  • 14
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Megan Okada
  2. Ping Guo
  3. Shai-anne Nalder
  4. Paul A Sigala
(2020)
Doxycycline has distinct apicoplast-specific mechanisms of antimalarial activity
eLife 9:e60246.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60246

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60246

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Fabien Duveau, Céline Cordier ... Pascal Hersen
    Research Article

    Natural environments of living organisms are often dynamic and multifactorial, with multiple parameters fluctuating over time. To better understand how cells respond to dynamically interacting factors, we quantified the effects of dual fluctuations of osmotic stress and glucose deprivation on yeast cells using microfluidics and time-lapse microscopy. Strikingly, we observed that cell proliferation, survival, and signaling depend on the phasing of the two periodic stresses. Cells divided faster, survived longer, and showed decreased transcriptional response when fluctuations of hyperosmotic stress and glucose deprivation occurred in phase than when the two stresses occurred alternatively. Therefore, glucose availability regulates yeast responses to dynamic osmotic stress, showcasing the key role of metabolic fluctuations in cellular responses to dynamic stress. We also found that mutants with impaired osmotic stress response were better adapted to alternating stresses than wild-type cells, showing that genetic mechanisms of adaptation to a persistent stress factor can be detrimental under dynamically interacting conditions.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yuting Zhang, Min Zhang ... Guojiang Chen
    Research Article

    Marburg virus (MARV) is one of the filovirus species that cause deadly hemorrhagic fever in humans, with mortality rates up to 90%. Neutralizing antibodies represent ideal candidates to prevent or treat virus disease. However, no antibody has been approved for MARV treatment to date. In this study, we identified a novel human antibody named AF-03 that targeted MARV glycoprotein (GP). AF-03 possessed a high binding affinity to MARV GP and showed neutralizing and protective activities against the pseudotyped MARV in vitro and in vivo. Epitope identification, including molecular docking and experiment-based analysis of mutated species, revealed that AF-03 recognized the Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1) binding domain within GP1. Interestingly, we found the neutralizing activity of AF-03 to pseudotyped Ebola viruses (EBOV, SUDV, and BDBV) harboring cleaved GP instead of full-length GP. Furthermore, NPC2-fused AF-03 exhibited neutralizing activity to several filovirus species and EBOV mutants via binding to CI-MPR. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that AF-03 represents a promising therapeutic cargo for filovirus-caused disease.