Regulation of dynamic pigment cell states at single-cell resolution

  1. Margherita Perillo
  2. Nathalie Oulhen
  3. Stephany Foster
  4. Maxwell Spurell
  5. Cristina Calestani
  6. Gary Wessel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brown University, United States
  2. Valdosta State University, United States

Abstract

Cells bearing pigment have diverse roles and are often under strict evolutionary selection. Here, we explore the regulation of pigmented cells in the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, an emerging model for diverse pigment function. We took advantage of single cell RNA-seq (scRNAseq) technology and discovered that pigment cells in the embryo segregated into two distinct populations, a mitotic cluster and a post-mitotic cluster. Gcm is essential for expression of several genes important for pigment function, but is only transiently expressed in these cells. We discovered unique genes expressed by pigment cells and test their expression with double fluorescence in situ hybridization. These genes include new members of the fmo family that are expressed selectively in pigment cells of the embryonic and in the coelomic cells of the adult - both cell-types having immune functions. Overall, this study identifies nodes of molecular intersection ripe for change by selective evolutionary pressures.

Data availability

The sequencing data have been made publicly available at Gene Expression Omnibus under GSE155427

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Margherita Perillo

    MCB Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0845-507X
  2. Nathalie Oulhen

    MCB Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stephany Foster

    MCB Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maxwell Spurell

    MCB Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Cristina Calestani

    Biology, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gary Wessel

    MCB Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    For correspondence
    rhet@brown.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1210-9279

Funding

National Institutes of Health (9RO1GM125071)

  • Gary Wessel

National Institutes of Health (1R01GM132222)

  • Gary Wessel

National Institutes of Health (1P20GM119943)

  • Nathalie Oulhen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Phillip A Newmark, Morgridge Institute for Research, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 25, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 15, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 19, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 28, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: March 15, 2024 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Perillo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,495
    views
  • 355
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Margherita Perillo
  2. Nathalie Oulhen
  3. Stephany Foster
  4. Maxwell Spurell
  5. Cristina Calestani
  6. Gary Wessel
(2020)
Regulation of dynamic pigment cell states at single-cell resolution
eLife 9:e60388.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60388

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60388

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kristine B Walhovd, Stine K Krogsrud ... Didac Vidal-Pineiro
    Research Article

    Human fetal development has been associated with brain health at later stages. It is unknown whether growth in utero, as indexed by birth weight (BW), relates consistently to lifespan brain characteristics and changes, and to what extent these influences are of a genetic or environmental nature. Here we show remarkably stable and lifelong positive associations between BW and cortical surface area and volume across and within developmental, aging and lifespan longitudinal samples (N = 5794, 4–82 y of age, w/386 monozygotic twins, followed for up to 8.3 y w/12,088 brain MRIs). In contrast, no consistent effect of BW on brain changes was observed. Partly environmental effects were indicated by analysis of twin BW discordance. In conclusion, the influence of prenatal growth on cortical topography is stable and reliable through the lifespan. This early-life factor appears to influence the brain by association of brain reserve, rather than brain maintenance. Thus, fetal influences appear omnipresent in the spacetime of the human brain throughout the human lifespan. Optimizing fetal growth may increase brain reserve for life, also in aging.