HSPCs display within-family homogeneity in differentiation and proliferation despite population heterogeneity

  1. Tamar Tak
  2. Giulio Prevedello
  3. Gaël Simon
  4. Noémie Paillon
  5. Camélia Benlabiod
  6. Caroline Marty
  7. Isabelle Plo
  8. Ken R Duffy
  9. Leïla Perié  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Curie, France
  2. INSERM, Gustave Roussy, France
  3. Institut Gustave Roussy; INSERM U1170, France
  4. Maynooth University, Ireland

Abstract

High-throughput single cell methods have uncovered substantial heterogeneity in the pool of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), but how much instruction is inherited by offspring from their heterogeneous ancestors remains unanswered. Using a method that enables simultaneous determination of common ancestor, division number, and differentiation status of a large collection of single cells, our data revealed that murine cells that derived from a common ancestor had significant similarities in their division progression and differentiation outcomes. Although each family diversifies, the overall collection of cell types observed is composed of homogeneous families. Heterogeneity between families could be explained, in part, by differences in ancestral expression of cell-surface markers. Our analyses demonstrate that fate decision by cells are largely inherited from ancestor cells, indicating the importance of common ancestor effects. These results may have ramifications for bone marrow transplantation and leukemia, where substantial heterogeneity in HSPC behavior is observed.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data has been provided for Figures 1-4 in supplemental File 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tamar Tak

    UMR168 Physico-chimie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5959-7927
  2. Giulio Prevedello

    CNRS UMR 3348, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9857-2351
  3. Gaël Simon

    UMR168 Physico-chimie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Noémie Paillon

    UMR168 Physico-chimie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6848-3016
  5. Camélia Benlabiod

    UMR1287, INSERM, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Caroline Marty

    UMR1287, INSERM, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Isabelle Plo

    INSERM U1170, Institut Gustave Roussy; INSERM U1170, VILLEJUIF, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ken R Duffy

    Hamilton Institute, Maynooth University, Co Kildare, Ireland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Leïla Perié

    UMR168 Physico-chimie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    leila.perie@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0798-4498

Funding

Bettencourt-Schue (ATIP-Avenir)

  • Leïla Perié

Labex CelTisPhyBio (ANR-10-LBX-0038)

  • Leïla Perié

Idex (Paris-Sciece-Lettres Program ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL)

  • Leïla Perié

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All the experimental procedures were approved by the local ethics committee (Comité d'Ethique en expérimentation animale de l'Institut Curie) under approval number DAP 2016 006.

Copyright

© 2021, Tak et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,579
    views
  • 222
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tamar Tak
  2. Giulio Prevedello
  3. Gaël Simon
  4. Noémie Paillon
  5. Camélia Benlabiod
  6. Caroline Marty
  7. Isabelle Plo
  8. Ken R Duffy
  9. Leïla Perié
(2021)
HSPCs display within-family homogeneity in differentiation and proliferation despite population heterogeneity
eLife 10:e60624.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60624

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60624

Further reading

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Sujeethkumar Prithiviraj, Alejandro Garcia Garcia ... Paul E Bourgine
    Research Article

    Tissue engineering strategies predominantly rely on the production of living substitutes, whereby implanted cells actively participate in the regenerative process. Beyond cost and delayed graft availability, the patient-specific performance of engineered tissues poses serious concerns on their clinical translation ability. A more exciting paradigm consists in exploiting cell-laid, engineered extracellular matrices (eECMs), which can be used as off-the-shelf materials. Here, the regenerative capacity solely relies on the preservation of the eECM structure and embedded signals to instruct an endogenous repair. We recently described the possibility to exploit custom human stem cell lines for eECM manufacturing. In addition to the conferred standardization, the availability of such cell lines opened avenues for the design of tailored eECMs by applying dedicated genetic tools. In this study, we demonstrated the exploitation of CRISPR/Cas9 as a high precision system for editing the composition and function of eECMs. Human mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (hMSC) lines were modified to knock out vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and assessed for their capacity to generate osteoinductive cartilage matrices. We report the successful editing of hMSCs, subsequently leading to targeted VEGF and RUNX2-knockout cartilage eECMs. Despite the absence of VEGF, eECMs retained full capacity to instruct ectopic endochondral ossification. Conversely, RUNX2-edited eECMs exhibited impaired hypertrophy, reduced ectopic ossification, and superior cartilage repair in a rat osteochondral defect. In summary, our approach can be harnessed to identify the necessary eECM factors driving endogenous repair. Our work paves the road toward the compositional eECMs editing and their exploitation in broad regenerative contexts.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Joshua G Medina-Feliciano, Griselle Valentín-Tirado ... José E Garcia-Arraras
    Research Article

    In holothurians, the regenerative process following evisceration involves the development of a ‘rudiment’ or ‘anlage’ at the injured end of the mesentery. This regenerating anlage plays a pivotal role in the formation of a new intestine. Despite its significance, our understanding of the molecular characteristics inherent to the constituent cells of this structure has remained limited. To address this gap, we employed state-of-the-art scRNA-seq and hybridization chain reaction fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses to discern the distinct cellular populations associated with the regeneration anlage. Through this approach, we successfully identified 13 distinct cell clusters. Among these, two clusters exhibit characteristics consistent with putative mesenchymal cells, while another four show features akin to coelomocyte cell populations. The remaining seven cell clusters collectively form a large group encompassing the coelomic epithelium of the regenerating anlage and mesentery. Within this large group of clusters, we recognized previously documented cell populations such as muscle precursors, neuroepithelial cells, and actively proliferating cells. Strikingly, our analysis provides data for identifying at least four other cellular populations that we define as the precursor cells of the growing anlage. Consequently, our findings strengthen the hypothesis that the coelomic epithelium of the anlage is a pluripotent tissue that gives rise to diverse cell types of the regenerating intestinal organ. Moreover, our results provide the initial view into the transcriptomic analysis of cell populations responsible for the amazing regenerative capabilities of echinoderms.