Evolution of fibroblasts in the lung metastatic microenvironment is driven by stage-specific transcriptional plasticity

Abstract

Mortality from breast cancer is almost exclusively a result of tumor metastasis, and lungs are one of the main metastatic sites. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are prominent players in the microenvironment of breast cancer. However, their role in the metastatic niche is largely unknown. In this study, we profiled the transcriptional co-evolution of lung fibroblasts isolated from transgenic mice at defined stage-specific time points of metastases formation. Employing multiple knowledge-based platforms of data analysis provided powerful insights on functional and temporal regulation of the transcriptome of fibroblasts. We demonstrate that fibroblasts in lung metastases are transcriptionally dynamic and plastic, and reveal stage-specific gene signatures that imply functional tasks, including extracellular matrix remodeling, stress response and shaping the inflammatory microenvironment. Furthermore, we identified Myc as a central regulator of fibroblast rewiring and found that stromal upregulation of Myc transcriptional networks is associated with disease progression in human breast cancer.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE128999.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ophir Shani

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yael Raz

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lea Monteran

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ye'ela Scharff

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Oshrat Levi-Galibov

    Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Or Megides

    Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hila Shacham

    Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Noam Cohen

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dana Silverbush

    Blavatnik School of Computer Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Camilla Avivi

    Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Roded Sharan

    Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Asaf Madi

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ruth Scherz-Shouval

    Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Iris Barshack

    Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Ilan Tsarfaty

    Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Neta Erez

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    For correspondence
    Netaerez@tauex.tau.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6506-9074

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (637069 MetCAF)

  • Ophir Shani
  • Yael Raz

Israel Science Foundation (1060/18)

  • Ophir Shani
  • Yael Raz
  • Noam Cohen
  • Neta Erez

The Emerson Collective

  • Ophir Shani
  • Lea Monteran
  • Neta Erez

Israel Cancer Association

  • Ophir Shani
  • Neta Erez

Israel Cancer Research Fund (Project Grant)

  • Ophir Shani
  • Yael Raz
  • Lea Monteran
  • Neta Erez

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

  • Or Megides
  • Ilan Tsarfaty

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Tel Aviv University. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols #: 01-18-035, M-13-026, 01-17-024) of the Tel Aviv University.

Human subjects: Human patient samples were collected and processed at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel under an approved institutional review board (IRB) (3112-16).

Copyright

© 2021, Shani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,995
    views
  • 565
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ophir Shani
  2. Yael Raz
  3. Lea Monteran
  4. Ye'ela Scharff
  5. Oshrat Levi-Galibov
  6. Or Megides
  7. Hila Shacham
  8. Noam Cohen
  9. Dana Silverbush
  10. Camilla Avivi
  11. Roded Sharan
  12. Asaf Madi
  13. Ruth Scherz-Shouval
  14. Iris Barshack
  15. Ilan Tsarfaty
  16. Neta Erez
(2021)
Evolution of fibroblasts in the lung metastatic microenvironment is driven by stage-specific transcriptional plasticity
eLife 10:e60745.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60745

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60745

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Qianqian Ju, Wenjing Sheng ... Cheng Sun
    Research Article

    TAK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is a key regulator in a wide variety of cellular processes. However, the functions and mechanisms involved in cancer metastasis are still not well understood. Here, we found that TAK1 knockdown promoted esophageal squamous cancer carcinoma (ESCC) migration and invasion, whereas TAK1 overexpression resulted in the opposite outcome. These in vitro findings were recapitulated in vivo in a xenograft metastatic mouse model. Mechanistically, co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry demonstrated that TAK1 interacted with phospholipase C epsilon 1 (PLCE1) and phosphorylated PLCE1 at serine 1060 (S1060). Functional studies revealed that phosphorylation at S1060 in PLCE1 resulted in decreased enzyme activity, leading to the repression of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis. As a result, the degradation products of PIP2 including diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol IP3 were reduced, which thereby suppressed signal transduction in the axis of PKC/GSK-3β/β-Catenin. Consequently, expression of cancer metastasis-related genes was impeded by TAK1. Overall, our data indicate that TAK1 plays a negative role in ESCC metastasis, which depends on the TAK1-induced phosphorylation of PLCE1 at S1060.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Xiangning Bu, Nathanael Ashby ... Inhee Chung
    Research Article

    Cell crowding is a common microenvironmental factor influencing various disease processes, but its role in promoting cell invasiveness remains unclear. This study investigates the biomechanical changes induced by cell crowding, focusing on pro-invasive cell volume reduction in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Crowding specifically enhanced invasiveness in high-grade DCIS cells through significant volume reduction compared to hyperplasia-mimicking or normal cells. Mass spectrometry revealed that crowding selectively relocated ion channels, including TRPV4, to the plasma membrane in high-grade DCIS cells. TRPV4 inhibition triggered by crowding decreased intracellular calcium levels, reduced cell volume, and increased invasion and motility. During this process, TRPV4 membrane relocation primed the channel for later activation, compensating for calcium loss. Analyses of patient-derived breast cancer tissues confirmed that plasma membrane-associated TRPV4 is specific to high-grade DCIS and indicates the presence of a pro-invasive cell volume reduction mechanotransduction pathway. Hyperosmotic conditions and pharmacologic TRPV4 inhibition mimicked crowding-induced effects, while TRPV4 activation reversed them. Silencing TRPV4 diminished mechanotransduction in high-grade DCIS cells, reducing calcium depletion, volume reduction, and motility. This study uncovers a novel pro-invasive mechanotransduction pathway driven by cell crowding and identifies TRPV4 as a potential biomarker for predicting invasion risk in DCIS patients.