Evolution of fibroblasts in the lung metastatic microenvironment is driven by stage-specific transcriptional plasticity

Abstract

Mortality from breast cancer is almost exclusively a result of tumor metastasis, and lungs are one of the main metastatic sites. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are prominent players in the microenvironment of breast cancer. However, their role in the metastatic niche is largely unknown. In this study, we profiled the transcriptional co-evolution of lung fibroblasts isolated from transgenic mice at defined stage-specific time points of metastases formation. Employing multiple knowledge-based platforms of data analysis provided powerful insights on functional and temporal regulation of the transcriptome of fibroblasts. We demonstrate that fibroblasts in lung metastases are transcriptionally dynamic and plastic, and reveal stage-specific gene signatures that imply functional tasks, including extracellular matrix remodeling, stress response and shaping the inflammatory microenvironment. Furthermore, we identified Myc as a central regulator of fibroblast rewiring and found that stromal upregulation of Myc transcriptional networks is associated with disease progression in human breast cancer.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE128999.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ophir Shani

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yael Raz

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lea Monteran

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ye'ela Scharff

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Oshrat Levi-Galibov

    Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Or Megides

    Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hila Shacham

    Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Noam Cohen

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dana Silverbush

    Blavatnik School of Computer Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Camilla Avivi

    Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Roded Sharan

    Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Asaf Madi

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ruth Scherz-Shouval

    Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Iris Barshack

    Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Ilan Tsarfaty

    Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Neta Erez

    Pathology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    For correspondence
    Netaerez@tauex.tau.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6506-9074

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (637069 MetCAF)

  • Ophir Shani
  • Yael Raz

Israel Science Foundation (1060/18)

  • Ophir Shani
  • Yael Raz
  • Noam Cohen
  • Neta Erez

The Emerson Collective

  • Ophir Shani
  • Lea Monteran
  • Neta Erez

Israel Cancer Association

  • Ophir Shani
  • Neta Erez

Israel Cancer Research Fund (Project Grant)

  • Ophir Shani
  • Yael Raz
  • Lea Monteran
  • Neta Erez

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

  • Or Megides
  • Ilan Tsarfaty

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Tel Aviv University. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols #: 01-18-035, M-13-026, 01-17-024) of the Tel Aviv University.

Human subjects: Human patient samples were collected and processed at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel under an approved institutional review board (IRB) (3112-16).

Copyright

© 2021, Shani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,832
    views
  • 547
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ophir Shani
  2. Yael Raz
  3. Lea Monteran
  4. Ye'ela Scharff
  5. Oshrat Levi-Galibov
  6. Or Megides
  7. Hila Shacham
  8. Noam Cohen
  9. Dana Silverbush
  10. Camilla Avivi
  11. Roded Sharan
  12. Asaf Madi
  13. Ruth Scherz-Shouval
  14. Iris Barshack
  15. Ilan Tsarfaty
  16. Neta Erez
(2021)
Evolution of fibroblasts in the lung metastatic microenvironment is driven by stage-specific transcriptional plasticity
eLife 10:e60745.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60745

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60745

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Yumin Fu, Xinyu Guo ... Lianxin Liu
    Review Article

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver tumor, is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and the incidence of liver cancer is still increasing worldwide. Curative hepatectomy or liver transplantation is only indicated for a small population of patients with early-stage HCC. However, most patients with HCC are not candidates for radical resection due to disease progression, leading to the choice of the conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug sorafenib as first-line treatment. In the past few years, immunotherapy, mainly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the clinical strategy for HCC. Combination therapy with ICIs has proven more effective than sorafenib, and clinical trials have been conducted to apply these therapies to patients. Despite significant progress in immunotherapy, the molecular mechanisms behind it remain unclear, and immune resistance is often challenging to overcome. Several studies have pointed out that the complex intercellular communication network in the immune microenvironment of HCC regulates tumor escape and drug resistance to immune response. This underscores the urgent need to analyze the immune microenvironment of HCC. This review describes the immunosuppressive cell populations in the immune microenvironment of HCC, as well as the related clinical trials, aiming to provide insights for the next generation of precision immunotherapy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Yang Liu, Yi Jiang ... Xi Gu
    Research Article

    Distant metastasis is the major cause of death in patients with breast cancer. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) contributes to breast cancer metastasis. Regulator of G protein-signaling (RGS) proteins modulates metastasis in various cancers. This study identified a novel role for RGS10 in EMT and metastasis in breast cancer. RGS10 protein levels were significantly lower in breast cancer tissues compared to normal breast tissues, and deficiency in RGS10 protein predicted a worse prognosis in patients with breast cancer. RGS10 protein levels were lower in the highly aggressive cell line MDA-MB-231 than in the poorly aggressive, less invasive cell lines MCF7 and SKBR3. Silencing RGS10 in SKBR3 cells enhanced EMT and caused SKBR3 cell migration and invasion. The ability of RGS10 to suppress EMT and metastasis in breast cancer was dependent on lipocalin-2 and MIR539-5p. These findings identify RGS10 as a tumor suppressor, prognostic biomarker, and potential therapeutic target for breast cancer.