1. Neuroscience

ASIC1a is required for neuronal activation via low-intensity ultrasound stimulation in mouse brain

  1. Jormay Lim
  2. Hsiao-Hsin Tai
  3. Wei-Hao Liao
  4. Ya-Cherng Chu
  5. Chen-Ming Hao
  6. Yueh-Chun Huang
  7. Cheng-Han Lee
  8. Shao-Shien Lin
  9. Sherry Hsu
  10. Ya-Chih Chien
  11. Dar-Ming Lai
  12. Wen-Shiang Chen
  13. Chih-Cheng Chen  Is a corresponding author
  14. Jaw-Lin Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Taiwan University, Taiwan
  2. National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
  3. Academia Sinica, Taiwan
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61660
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Jormay Lim
  2. Hsiao-Hsin Tai
  3. Wei-Hao Liao
  4. Ya-Cherng Chu
  5. Chen-Ming Hao
  6. Yueh-Chun Huang
  7. Cheng-Han Lee
  8. Shao-Shien Lin
  9. Sherry Hsu
  10. Ya-Chih Chien
  11. Dar-Ming Lai
  12. Wen-Shiang Chen
  13. Chih-Cheng Chen
  14. Jaw-Lin Wang
(2021)
ASIC1a is required for neuronal activation via low-intensity ultrasound stimulation in mouse brain
eLife 10:e61660.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61660
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

CNS neurons have no sensory function, protected by the skull. For this reason, brain neuromodulation by ultrasound were either done at a high intensity or through auditory nerves. We demonstrate in this study CNS neurons react to ultrasound stimulation at an intensity (5 mW/cm2) far lower than typical therapeutic ultrasound (>30 mW/cm2). Using micropipette ultrasound in calcium imaging, we show ASIC1a channels play a role in the reactions of CNS neurons to ultrasound, pointing to the molecular basis for direct ultrasound neuromodulation at low intensity. Furthermore, we also show evidence of neurogenesis with the same ultrasound stimulation, suggesting potential therapeutic translation.

Data availability

All data generated relevant to this study are included in the manuscript are presented in the manuscript either as main figures or as supplementary figures. Source data files will be provided when there is a need.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jormay Lim

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering,, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7191-545X

  2. Hsiao-Hsin Tai

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Wei-Hao Liao

    Department of Rehabilitations, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Ya-Cherng Chu

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Chen-Ming Hao

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Yueh-Chun Huang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Cheng-Han Lee

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Shao-Shien Lin

    Department of Neurosurgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Sherry Hsu

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Ya-Chih Chien

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Dar-Ming Lai

    Department of Neurosurgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  12. Wen-Shiang Chen

    Department of Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  13. Chih-Cheng Chen

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    For correspondence
    chih@ibms.sinica.edu.tw
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  14. Jaw-Lin Wang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    For correspondence
    jlwang@ntu.edu.tw
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5734-9276

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2221-E-002-068-MY3)

  • Jaw-Lin Wang

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST108-2321-B-002-047)

  • Jaw-Lin Wang

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2321-B-002-061-MY2)

  • Jaw-Lin Wang

National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX109-10924EI)

  • Jaw-Lin Wang

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2321-B-001-028-MY2)

  • Chih-Cheng Chen

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2321-B001-010)

  • Chih-Cheng Chen

National Taiwan University (NTU-CC-107L891105)

  • Jaw-Lin Wang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Rohini Kuner, Universität Heidelberg, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The animal work has been performed following the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of National Taiwan University. All of the animals handling complies to the IACUC protocol #20190055 of National Taiwan University Hospital.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 10, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: July 31, 2020
  3. Accepted: September 22, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: September 27, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 12, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Lim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,274
    views
  • 361
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jormay Lim
  2. Hsiao-Hsin Tai
  3. Wei-Hao Liao
  4. Ya-Cherng Chu
  5. Chen-Ming Hao
  6. Yueh-Chun Huang
  7. Cheng-Han Lee
  8. Shao-Shien Lin
  9. Sherry Hsu
  10. Ya-Chih Chien
  11. Dar-Ming Lai
  12. Wen-Shiang Chen
  13. Chih-Cheng Chen
  14. Jaw-Lin Wang
(2021)
ASIC1a is required for neuronal activation via low-intensity ultrasound stimulation in mouse brain
eLife 10:e61660.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61660

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61660

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    The components of an electrical synapse as revealed by expansion microscopy of a single synaptic contact

    Sandra P Cárdenas-García, Sundas Ijaz, Alberto E Pereda
    Research Article

    Most nervous systems combine both transmitter-mediated and direct cell-cell communication, known as 'chemical' and 'electrical' synapses, respectively. Chemical synapses can be identified by their multiple structural components. Electrical synapses are, on the other hand, generally defined by the presence of a 'gap junction' (a cluster of intercellular channels) between two neuronal processes. However, while gap junctions provide the communicating mechanism, it is unknown whether electrical transmission requires the contribution of additional cellular structures. We investigated this question at identifiable single synaptic contacts on the zebrafish Mauthner cells, at which gap junctions coexist with specializations for neurotransmitter release and where the contact unequivocally defines the anatomical limits of a synapse. Expansion microscopy of these single contacts revealed a detailed map of the incidence and spatial distribution of proteins pertaining to various synaptic structures. Multiple gap junctions of variable size were identified by the presence of their molecular components. Remarkably, most of the synaptic contact's surface was occupied by interleaving gap junctions and components of adherens junctions, suggesting a close functional association between these two structures. In contrast, glutamate receptors were confined to small peripheral portions of the contact, indicating that most of the synaptic area functions as an electrical synapse. Thus, our results revealed the overarching organization of an electrical synapse that operates with not one, but multiple gap junctions, in close association with structural and signaling molecules known to be components of adherens junctions. The relationship between these intercellular structures will aid in establishing the boundaries of electrical synapses found throughout animal connectomes and provide insight into the structural organization and functional diversity of electrical synapses.

    1. Neuroscience

    Chronic activation of a negative engram induces behavioral and cellular abnormalities

    Alexandra L Jellinger, Rebecca L Suthard ... Steve Ramirez
    Research Article

    Negative memories engage a brain and body-wide stress response in humans that can alter cognition and behavior. Prolonged stress responses induce maladaptive cellular, circuit, and systems-level changes that can lead to pathological brain states and corresponding disorders in which mood and memory are affected. However, it is unclear if repeated activation of cells processing negative memories induces similar phenotypes in mice. In this study, we used an activity-dependent tagging method to access neuronal ensembles and assess their molecular characteristics. Sequencing memory engrams in mice revealed that positive (male-to-female exposure) and negative (foot shock) cells upregulated genes linked to anti- and pro-inflammatory responses, respectively. To investigate the impact of persistent activation of negative engrams, we chemogenetically activated them in the ventral hippocampus over 3 months and conducted anxiety and memory-related tests. Negative engram activation increased anxiety behaviors in both 6- and 14-month-old mice, reduced spatial working memory in older mice, impaired fear extinction in younger mice, and heightened fear generalization in both age groups. Immunohistochemistry revealed changes in microglial and astrocytic structure and number in the hippocampus. In summary, repeated activation of negative memories induces lasting cellular and behavioral abnormalities in mice, offering insights into the negative effects of chronic negative thinking-like behaviors on human health.

    1. Neuroscience

    Clustered synapses develop in distinct dendritic domains in visual cortex before eye opening

    Alexandra H Leighton, Juliette E Cheyne, Christian Lohmann
    Research Article

    Synaptic inputs to cortical neurons are highly structured in adult sensory systems, such that neighboring synapses along dendrites are activated by similar stimuli. This organization of synaptic inputs, called synaptic clustering, is required for high-fidelity signal processing, and clustered synapses can already be observed before eye opening. However, how clustered inputs emerge during development is unknown. Here, we employed concurrent in vivo whole-cell patch-clamp and dendritic calcium imaging to map spontaneous synaptic inputs to dendrites of layer 2/3 neurons in the mouse primary visual cortex during the second postnatal week until eye opening. We found that the number of functional synapses and the frequency of transmission events increase several fold during this developmental period. At the beginning of the second postnatal week, synapses assemble specifically in confined dendritic segments, whereas other segments are devoid of synapses. By the end of the second postnatal week, just before eye opening, dendrites are almost entirely covered by domains of co-active synapses. Finally, co-activity with their neighbor synapses correlates with synaptic stabilization and potentiation. Thus, clustered synapses form in distinct functional domains presumably to equip dendrites with computational modules for high-capacity sensory processing when the eyes open.