Glycinergic axonal inhibition subserves acute spatial sensitivity to sudden increases in sound intensity

  1. Tom P Franken  Is a corresponding author
  2. Brian J Bondy
  3. David B Haimes
  4. Joshua Goldwyn
  5. Nace L Golding
  6. Philip H Smith
  7. Philip Joris  Is a corresponding author
  1. KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. UT Austin, United States
  3. Swarthmore College, United States
  4. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  5. University of Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Locomotion generates adventitious sounds which enable detection and localization of predators and prey. Such sounds contain brisk changes or transients in amplitude. We investigated the hypothesis that ill-understood temporal specializations in binaural circuits subserve lateralization of such sound transients, based on different time of arrival at the ears (interaural time differences, ITDs). We find that Lateral Superior Olive (LSO) neurons show exquisite ITD-sensitivity, reflecting extreme precision and reliability of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, in contrast to Medial Superior Olive neurons, traditionally viewed as the ultimate ITD-detectors. In vivo, inhibition blocks LSO excitation over an extremely short window, which, in vitro, required synaptically-evoked inhibition. Light and electron microscopy revealed inhibitory synapses on the axon initial segment as the structural basis of this observation. These results reveal a neural vetoing mechanism with extreme temporal and spatial precision and establish the LSO as the primary nucleus for binaural processing of sound transients.

Data availability

Source data files have been provided for all figures with electrophysiological recordings and for the computational model (Figures 1,2,3,4,7,8 and supplements). Custom MATLAB code for the computational model is provided as a source code file.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tom P Franken

    Department of Neuroscience, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    tfranken@salk.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7160-5152
  2. Brian J Bondy

    Department of Neuroscience and Center for Learning and Memory, UT Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. David B Haimes

    Department of Neuroscience and Center for Learning and Memory, UT Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Joshua Goldwyn

    Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5733-9089
  5. Nace L Golding

    Department of Neuroscience and Center for Learning and Memory, UT Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4072-310X
  6. Philip H Smith

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Philip Joris

    University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    philip.joris@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9759-5375

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Ph.D. fellowship)

  • Tom P Franken

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds KU Leuven (OT-14-118)

  • Philip Joris

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0961.11)

  • Philip Joris

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0A11.13)

  • Philip Joris

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.091214N)

  • Philip Joris

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC006212)

  • Philip H Smith
  • Philip Joris

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC011403)

  • Nace L Golding
  • Philip Joris

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC006788)

  • Nace L Golding

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (1F31DC017377-01)

  • David B Haimes

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All in vivo procedures were approved by the KU Leuven Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments (protocol numbers P155/2008, P123/2010, P167/2012, P123/2013, P005/2014). All in vitro recording and immunohistochemistry experiments were approved by the University of Texas at Austin Animal Care and Use Committee in compliance with the recommendations of the United States National Institutes of Health.

Copyright

© 2021, Franken et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 944
    views
  • 166
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tom P Franken
  2. Brian J Bondy
  3. David B Haimes
  4. Joshua Goldwyn
  5. Nace L Golding
  6. Philip H Smith
  7. Philip Joris
(2021)
Glycinergic axonal inhibition subserves acute spatial sensitivity to sudden increases in sound intensity
eLife 10:e62183.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62183

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62183

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vincent Huson, Wade G Regehr
    Research Article

    Unipolar brush cells (UBCs) are excitatory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex that receive mossy fiber (MF) inputs and excite granule cells. The UBC population responds to brief burst activation of MFs with a continuum of temporal transformations, but it is not known how UBCs transform the diverse range of MF input patterns that occur in vivo. Here, we use cell-attached recordings from UBCs in acute cerebellar slices to examine responses to MF firing patterns that are based on in vivo recordings. We find that MFs evoke a continuum of responses in the UBC population, mediated by three different types of glutamate receptors that each convey a specialized component. AMPARs transmit timing information for single stimuli at up to 5 spikes/s, and for very brief bursts. A combination of mGluR2/3s (inhibitory) and mGluR1s (excitatory) mediates a continuum of delayed, and broadened responses to longer bursts, and to sustained high frequency activation. Variability in the mGluR2/3 component controls the time course of the onset of firing, and variability in the mGluR1 component controls the duration of prolonged firing. We conclude that the combination of glutamate receptor types allows each UBC to simultaneously convey different aspects of MF firing. These findings establish that UBCs are highly flexible circuit elements that provide diverse temporal transformations that are well suited to contribute to specialized processing in different regions of the cerebellar cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Eleni Hackwell, Sharon R Ladyman ... David R Grattan
    Research Article

    The specific role that prolactin plays in lactational infertility, as distinct from other suckling or metabolic cues, remains unresolved. Here, deletion of the prolactin receptor (Prlr) from forebrain neurons or arcuate kisspeptin neurons resulted in failure to maintain normal lactation-induced suppression of estrous cycles. Kisspeptin immunoreactivity and pulsatile LH secretion were increased in these mice, even in the presence of ongoing suckling stimulation and lactation. GCaMP fibre photometry of arcuate kisspeptin neurons revealed that the normal episodic activity of these neurons is rapidly suppressed in pregnancy and this was maintained throughout early lactation. Deletion of Prlr from arcuate kisspeptin neurons resulted in early reactivation of episodic activity of kisspeptin neurons prior to a premature return of reproductive cycles in early lactation. These observations show dynamic variation in arcuate kisspeptin neuronal activity associated with the hormonal changes of pregnancy and lactation, and provide direct evidence that prolactin action on arcuate kisspeptin neurons is necessary for suppressing fertility during lactation in mice.