Introduction to the EQIPD quality system
- PAASP, Germany
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Germany
- Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Belgium
- PAASP GmbH, Germany
- AAALAC International, Spain
- Porsolt, France
- Sanofi, France
- UCB, United Kingdom
- Novartis pharma, Switzerland
- Pfizer, United States
- University of Groningen, Netherlands
- Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. (DZNE), Germany
- Charles River Laboratories, France
- Cohen Veterans Bioscience, United States
- German Mouse Clinic, Germany
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
- Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, United States
- PAASP, France
- Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
- Institute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Germany
- National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
- The University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands
- University of Belgrade, Serbia
- Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
- University of Helsinki, Finland
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom
- Avertim, Belgium
- University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Abstract
While high risk of failure is an inherent part of developing innovative therapies, it can be reduced by adherence to evidence-based rigorous research practices. Numerous analyses conducted to date have clearly identified measures that need to be taken to improve research rigor. Supported through the European Union's Innovative Medicines Initiative, the EQIPD consortium has developed a novel preclinical research quality system that can be applied in both public and private sectors and is free for anyone to use. The EQIPD Quality System was designed to be suited to boost innovation by ensuring the generation of robust and reliable preclinical data while being lean, effective and not becoming a burden that could negatively impact the freedom to explore scientific questions. EQIPD defines research quality as the extent to which research data are fit for their intended use. Fitness, in this context, is defined by the stakeholders, who are the scientists directly involved in the research, but also their funders, sponsors, publishers, research tool manufacturers and collaboration partners such as peers in a multi-site research project. The essence of the EQIPD Quality System is the set of 18 core requirements that can be addressed flexibly, according to user-specific needs and following a user-defined trajectory. The EQIPD Quality System proposes guidance on expectations for quality-related measures, defines criteria for adequate processes (i.e., performance standards) and provides examples of how such measures can be developed and implemented. However, it does not prescribe any pre-determined solutions. EQIPD has also developed tools (for optional use) to support users in implementing the system and assessment services for those research units that successfully implement the quality system and seek formal accreditation. Building upon the feedback from users and continuous improvement, a sustainable EQIPD Quality System will ultimately serve the entire community of scientists conducting non-regulated preclinical research, by helping them generate reliable data that are fit for their intended use.
Data availability
We have not generated any data
Article and author information
Author details
Sandrine Bongiovanni
Esmeralda Castaños-Vélez
Alexander Dityatev
Ernesto Prado Montes de Oca
Funding
Innovative Medicines Initiative (777364)
- Malcolm R MacLeod
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Mone Zaidi, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
Publication history
- Received: September 21, 2020
- Accepted: May 20, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: May 24, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: June 7, 2021 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Bespalov et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,853
- Page views
-
- 409
- Downloads
-
- 21
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Introduction to the EQIPD quality system
eLife 10:e63294.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63294
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
One signature of the human brain is its ability to derive knowledge from language inputs, in addition to nonlinguistic sensory channels such as vision and touch. How does human language experience modulate the mechanism by which semantic knowledge is stored in the human brain? We investigated this question using a unique human model with varying amounts and qualities of early language exposure: early deaf adults who were born to hearing parents and had reduced early exposure and delayed acquisition of any natural human language (speech or sign), with early deaf adults who acquired sign language from birth as the control group that matches on nonlinguistic sensory experiences. Neural responses in a semantic judgment task with 90 written words that were familiar to both groups were measured using fMRI. The deaf group with reduced early language exposure, compared with the deaf control group, showed reduced semantic sensitivity, in both multivariate pattern (semantic structure encoding) and univariate (abstractness effect) analyses, in the left dorsal anterior temporal lobe (dATL). These results provide positive, causal evidence that language experience drives the neural semantic representation in the dATL, highlighting the roles of language in forming human neural semantic structures beyond nonverbal sensory experiences.
-
- Neuroscience
Across phyla, males often produce species-specific vocalizations to attract females. Although understanding the neural mechanisms underlying behavior has been challenging in vertebrates, we previously identified two anatomically distinct central pattern generators (CPGs) that drive the fast and slow clicks of male Xenopus laevis, using an ex vivo preparation that produces fictive vocalizations. Here, we extended this approach to four additional species, X. amieti, X. cliivi, X. petersii, and X. tropicalis, by developing ex vivo brain preparation from which fictive vocalizations are elicited in response to a chemical or electrical stimulus. We found that even though the courtship calls are species-specific, the CPGs used to generate clicks are conserved across species. The fast CPGs, which critically rely on reciprocal connections between the parabrachial nucleus and the nucleus ambiguus, are conserved among fast-click species, and slow CPGs are shared among slow-click species. In addition, our results suggest that testosterone plays a role in organizing fast CPGs in fast-click species, but not in slow-click species. Moreover, fast CPGs are not inherited by all species but monopolized by fast-click species. The results suggest that species-specific calls of the genus Xenopus have evolved by utilizing conserved slow and/or fast CPGs inherited by each species.
