Introduction to the EQIPD quality system
- PAASP, Germany
- Charité Universitätsmedizin, Germany
- Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Belgium
- PAASP GmbH, Germany
- AAALAC International, Spain
- Porsolt, France
- Sanofi, France
- UCB, United Kingdom
- Novartis pharma, Switzerland
- Pfizer, United States
- University of Groningen, Netherlands
- Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. (DZNE), Germany
- Charles River Laboratories, France
- Cohen Veterans Bioscience, United States
- German Mouse Clinic, Germany
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
- Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, United States
- PAASP, France
- Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
- Institute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Germany
- National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
- The University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands
- University of Belgrade, Serbia
- Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
- University of Helsinki, Finland
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom
- Avertim, Belgium
- University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Abstract
While high risk of failure is an inherent part of developing innovative therapies, it can be reduced by adherence to evidence-based rigorous research practices. Numerous analyses conducted to date have clearly identified measures that need to be taken to improve research rigor. Supported through the European Union's Innovative Medicines Initiative, the EQIPD consortium has developed a novel preclinical research quality system that can be applied in both public and private sectors and is free for anyone to use. The EQIPD Quality System was designed to be suited to boost innovation by ensuring the generation of robust and reliable preclinical data while being lean, effective and not becoming a burden that could negatively impact the freedom to explore scientific questions. EQIPD defines research quality as the extent to which research data are fit for their intended use. Fitness, in this context, is defined by the stakeholders, who are the scientists directly involved in the research, but also their funders, sponsors, publishers, research tool manufacturers and collaboration partners such as peers in a multi-site research project. The essence of the EQIPD Quality System is the set of 18 core requirements that can be addressed flexibly, according to user-specific needs and following a user-defined trajectory. The EQIPD Quality System proposes guidance on expectations for quality-related measures, defines criteria for adequate processes (i.e., performance standards) and provides examples of how such measures can be developed and implemented. However, it does not prescribe any pre-determined solutions. EQIPD has also developed tools (for optional use) to support users in implementing the system and assessment services for those research units that successfully implement the quality system and seek formal accreditation. Building upon the feedback from users and continuous improvement, a sustainable EQIPD Quality System will ultimately serve the entire community of scientists conducting non-regulated preclinical research, by helping them generate reliable data that are fit for their intended use.
Data availability
We have not generated any data
Article and author information
Author details
Sandrine Bongiovanni
Esmeralda Castaños-Vélez
Alexander Dityatev
Ernesto Prado Montes de Oca
Funding
Innovative Medicines Initiative (777364)
- Malcolm R MacLeod
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2021, Bespalov et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,562
- views
-
- 544
- downloads
-
- 48
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Introduction to the EQIPD quality system
eLife 10:e63294.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63294
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The reward and novelty-related neuromodulator dopamine plays an important role in hippocampal long-term memory, which is thought to involve protein-synthesis-dependent synaptic plasticity. However, the direct effects of dopamine on protein synthesis, and the functional implications of newly synthesised proteins for synaptic plasticity, have not yet been investigated. We have previously reported that timing-dependent synaptic depression (t-LTD) can be converted into potentiation by dopamine application during synaptic stimulation (Brzosko et al., 2015) or postsynaptic burst activation (Fuchsberger et al., 2022). Here, we show that dopamine increases protein synthesis in mouse hippocampal CA1 neurons, enabling dopamine-dependent long-term potentiation (DA-LTP), which is mediated via the Ca2+-sensitive adenylate cyclase (AC) subtypes 1/8, cAMP, and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). We found that neuronal activity is required for the dopamine-induced increase in protein synthesis. Furthermore, dopamine induced a protein-synthesis-dependent increase in the AMPA receptor subunit GluA1, but not GluA2. We found that DA-LTP is absent in GluA1 knock-out mice and that it requires calcium-permeable AMPA receptors. Taken together, our results suggest that dopamine together with neuronal activity controls synthesis of plasticity-related proteins, including GluA1, which enable DA-LTP via a signalling pathway distinct from that of conventional LTP.
-
- Neuroscience
Social relationships guide individual behavior and ultimately shape the fabric of society. Primates exhibit particularly complex, differentiated, and multidimensional social relationships, which form interwoven social networks, reflecting both individual social tendencies and specific dyadic interactions. How the patterns of behavior that underlie these social relationships emerge from moment-to-moment patterns of social information processing remains unclear. Here, we assess social relationships among a group of four monkeys, focusing on aggression, grooming, and proximity. We show that individual differences in social attention vary with individual differences in patterns of general social tendencies and patterns of individual engagement with specific partners. Oxytocin administration altered social attention and its relationship to both social tendencies and dyadic relationships, particularly grooming and aggression. Our findings link the dynamics of visual information sampling to the dynamics of primate social networks.
