Local circuit allowing hypothalamic control of hippocampal area CA2 activity and consequences for CA1

  1. Vincent Robert
  2. Ludivine Therreau
  3. Vivien Chevaleyre
  4. Eude Lepicard
  5. Cécile Viollet
  6. Julie Cognet
  7. Arthur JY Huang
  8. Roman Boehringer
  9. Denis Polygalov
  10. Thomas J McHugh
  11. Rebecca Ann Piskorowski  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266, France
  2. Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266; GHU PARIS psychiatrie & neurosciences, France
  3. RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Japan

Abstract

The hippocampus is critical for memory formation. The hypothalamic supramammillary nucleus (SuM) sends long-range projections to hippocampal area CA2. While the SuM-CA2 connection is critical for social memory, how this input acts on the local circuit is unknown. Using mice, we found that SuM axon stimulation elicited mixed excitatory and inhibitory responses in area CA2 pyramidal neurons (PNs). Parvalbumin-expressing basket cells were largely responsible for the feedforward inhibitory drive of SuM over area CA2. Inhibition recruited by the SuM input onto CA2 PNs increased the precision of action potential firing both in conditions of low and high cholinergic tone. Furthermore, SuM stimulation in area CA2 modulated CA1 activity, indicating that synchronized CA2 output drives a pulsed inhibition in area CA1. Hence, the network revealed here lays basis for understanding how SuM activity directly acts on the local hippocampal circuit to allow social memory encoding.

Data availability

The data analysed for this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. These are included in tables, and data file for figure 7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vincent Robert

    Team of Synpatic Plasticity and Neural Networks, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ludivine Therreau

    Team of Synpatic Plasticity and Neural Networks, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Vivien Chevaleyre

    Team of Synpatic Plasticity and Neural Networks, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eude Lepicard

    Team of Synpatic Plasticity and Neural Networks, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Cécile Viollet

    Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266; GHU PARIS psychiatrie & neurosciences, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Julie Cognet

    Team of Synpatic Plasticity and Neural Networks, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Arthur JY Huang

    Laboratory for Circuit and Behavioral Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Roman Boehringer

    Laboratory for Circuit and Behavioral Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2856-3262
  9. Denis Polygalov

    Laboratory for Circuit and Behavioral Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8165-5257
  10. Thomas J McHugh

    Laboratory for Circuit and Behavioral Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1243-5189
  11. Rebecca Ann Piskorowski

    Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM UMRS1266; GHU PARIS psychiatrie & neurosciences, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    rebecca.piskorowski@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0120-2360

Funding

RIKEN Brain Science Institute

  • Thomas J McHugh

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (19H05646)

  • Thomas J McHugh

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (19H05233)

  • Thomas J McHugh

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-JSV4-0002-01)

  • Rebecca Ann Piskorowski

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE37-0020-01)

  • Rebecca Ann Piskorowski

Ville de Paris (Programme Emergences)

  • Rebecca Ann Piskorowski

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young INvestigator Award)

  • Rebecca Ann Piskorowski

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM:FTD20170437387)

  • Vincent Robert

Schizo-Oui

  • Vincent Robert

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with institutional regulations (French Ministry of Research and Education protocol #12406-2016040417305913). Animal sample sizes were estimated using power tests with standard deviations and ANOVA values from pilot experiments. A 15 % failure rate was assumed to account for stereotaxic injection errors and slice preparation complications. Every effort was made to reduce animal suffering.

Copyright

© 2021, Robert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,912
    views
  • 451
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vincent Robert
  2. Ludivine Therreau
  3. Vivien Chevaleyre
  4. Eude Lepicard
  5. Cécile Viollet
  6. Julie Cognet
  7. Arthur JY Huang
  8. Roman Boehringer
  9. Denis Polygalov
  10. Thomas J McHugh
  11. Rebecca Ann Piskorowski
(2021)
Local circuit allowing hypothalamic control of hippocampal area CA2 activity and consequences for CA1
eLife 10:e63352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63352

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63352

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Elena Massai, Marco Bonizzato ... Marina Martinez
    Research Article

    Control of voluntary limb movement is predominantly attributed to the contralateral motor cortex. However, increasing evidence suggests the involvement of ipsilateral cortical networks in this process, especially in motor tasks requiring bilateral coordination, such as locomotion. In this study, we combined a unilateral thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) with a cortical neuroprosthetic approach to investigate the functional role of the ipsilateral motor cortex in rat movement through spared contralesional pathways. Our findings reveal that in all SCI rats, stimulation of the ipsilesional motor cortex promoted a bilateral synergy. This synergy involved the elevation of the contralateral foot along with ipsilateral hindlimb extension. Additionally, in two out of seven animals, stimulation of a sub-region of the hindlimb motor cortex modulated ipsilateral hindlimb flexion. Importantly, ipsilateral cortical stimulation delivered after SCI immediately alleviated multiple locomotor and postural deficits, and this effect persisted after ablation of the homologous motor cortex. These results provide strong evidence of a causal link between cortical activation and precise ipsilateral control of hindlimb movement. This study has significant implications for the development of future neuroprosthetic technology and our understanding of motor control in the context of SCI.

    1. Neuroscience
    Bharath Krishnan, Noah Cowan
    Insight

    Mice can generate a cognitive map of an environment based on self-motion signals when there is a fixed association between their starting point and the location of their goal.