Optogenetic strategies for high-efficiency all-optical interrogation using blue light-sensitive opsins
Abstract
All-optical methods for imaging and manipulating brain networks with high spatial resolution are fundamental to study how neuronal ensembles drive behavior. Stimulation of neuronal ensembles using holographic techniques requires high-sensitivity actuators to avoid photodamage and heating. Moreover, two-photon-excitable opsins should be insensitive to light at wavelengths used for imaging. To achieve this goal, we developed a novel soma-targeted variant of the large-conductance blue light-sensitive opsin CoChR (stCoChR). In the mouse cortex in vivo, we combined holographic two-photon stimulation of stCoChR with an amplified laser tuned at the opsin absorption peak and imaging of the red-shifted indicator jRCaMP1a. Compared to previously characterized blue light-sensitive soma-targeted opsins in vivo, stCoChR allowed neuronal stimulation with more than 10-fold lower average power and no spectral crosstalk. The combination of stCoChR, tuned amplified laser stimulation, and red-shifted functional indicators promises to be a powerful tool for large-scale interrogation of neural networks in the intact brain.
Data availability
We provide Source Data for the data plotted in all figures as Excel Source Data files.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
H2020 European Research Council (647725)
- Tommaso Fellin
Candice Appleton Family Trust
- Ofer Yizhar
H2020-RIA (DEEPER 101016787)
- Ofer Yizhar
NIH Brain Initiative (U01 NS090576)
- Tommaso Fellin
NIH Brain Initiative (U19 NS107464)
- Tommaso Fellin
H2020-RIA (DEEPER 101016787)
- Tommaso Fellin
H2020 European Research Council (819496)
- Ofer Yizhar
Human Frontier Science Program
- Ofer Yizhar
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
- Ofer Yizhar
Ilse Katz Institute for Material Sciences and Magnetic Resonance Research
- Ofer Yizhar
Adelis Prize for Brain Research
- Ofer Yizhar
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All experiments involving animals were approved by the IIT Animal Welfare Body, by theNational Council on Animal Care of the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization #34/2015-PR, #1084/2020-PR), and by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and carried out in accordance with the guidelines established by the European Communities Council Directive.
Copyright
© 2021, Forli et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,536
- views
-
- 617
- downloads
-
- 31
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.
-
- Neuroscience
During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.