(a) Representative whole-cell Ca2+ current recordings elicited by 200 ms depolarizations from −50 to +80 mV from ncDHPR (top) and wt (center) myotubes before (left) and after (right) perfusion with …
Data for IV graph.
(a) Plots of current-voltage relationship for DHPR-mediated Na+ currents recorded from ncDHPR myotubes indicate the absence of slow-activating, non-inactivating inward Na+ currents in the presence …
Data for IV graphs.
Representative whole-cell Li+ current recordings from wt and ncDHPR myotubes in response to 200 ms depolarizations from −50 to +40 mV in the presence of 100 mM external Li+ and either 0 (a), 1 µM (b)…
Data for dose-response graph.
(a) Plots of current-voltage relationship for DHPR-mediated Li+ currents recorded from ncDHPR myotubes in the presence (Imax = −0.35 ± 0.13 pA/pF; n = 16) and absence (Imax = −2.41 ± 0.27 pA/pF; n = …
Data for IV graph.
(a, b) De novo conformation prediction of peptide F600 - I624 constituting the selectivity filter and adjacent pore helices P1 and P2 of DHPRα1S repeat II (P1II, P2II) (left) and of peptide F1309 - …
Symbols and nomenclature are identical to Figure 5. (a) Zebrafish slow-muscle specific DHPRα1S carries a distorted EEEE locus, due to substitution of E292 of repeat I by Q. Exchange of E292 with Q292…
(a) Top view of the pore illustrating the EEEE and DCS loci. The residues of the EEEE locus are displayed in red and the DCS locus is indicated by the position of the residues N617 or D617. (b) Side …
The dark blue spheres represent van der Waals radii of Ca2+ ions. The residues of the EEEE locus are displayed in red.
Ionic interactions between D617 of the DCS locus and the upper Ca2+ ion are reflected by the slow detachment and thus slow migration of the Ca2+ ion toward the cytosolic side, suggesting occlusion …
Imax values of inward ILi+ are represented as mean ± SEM with corresponding number of recordings (n) from wt and ncDHPR myotubes. *p<0.05; ***p<0.001, unpaired Student’s t-test.
Free [Ca2+] | wt | ncDHPR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Imax (pA/pF) | n | Imax (pA/pF) | n | |
0 | −2.07 ± 0.47 | 9 | −2.32 ± 0.35 | 16 |
10 nM | −2.08 ± 0.19 | 6 | −2.30 ± 0.19 | 12 |
30 nM | ‒ | ‒ | −2.17 ± 0.27 | 12 |
100 nM | −1.94 ± 0.23 | 5 | −1.98 ± 0.30 | 9 |
300 nM | −2.08 ± 0.16 | 8 | −1.33 ± 0.29 * | 8 |
1 µM | −1.68 ± 0.25 | 6 | −0.47 ± 0.10 *** | 8 |
3 µM | −0.24 ± 0.04 | 6 | −0.06 ± 0.02 *** | 7 |
10 µM | −0.09 ± 0.05 | 6 | ‒ | ‒ |
30 µM | −0.01 ± 0.02 | 5 | −0.02 ± 0.02 | 8 |
Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus) | ncDHPR | doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00629-x Dayal et al., 2017 | ||
Chemical compound, drug | (±)Bay K 8644 | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat#: B112 | 10 µM |
Chemical compound, drug | Nifedipine | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat#: N7634 | 10 µM |
Chemical compound, drug | Tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA-Cl) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat#: T2265 | 145 mM |
Chemical compound, drug | N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide (BTS) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc | Cat#: sc-202087 | 100 µM |
Software, algorithm | MaxChelator simulation program | https://somapp.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/pharmacology/bers/maxchelator/ | RRID:SCR_018807 | |
Software, algorithm | ClampFit | Axon Instruments | version 10.7 | |
Software, algorithm | SigmaPlot | Systat Software, Inc. | RRID:SCR_010285 | version 11.0 |
Software, algorithm | GraphPad Prism | GraphPad Software, LLC | RRID:SCR_002798 | version 8 |
Software, algorithm | PEP-FOLD 3.5 | RPBS web portal | Version 3.5 | |
Software, algorithm | GROMACS | University of Stockholm, University of Upsala | RRID:SCR_014565 | version 2019.2 |
Software, algorithm | MOE | Chemical Computing Group ULC | RRID:SCR_014882 | version 2020.01 |
Software, algorithm | AMBER | University of California, San Francisco. | RRID:SCR_014230 | Version 2020 |
Software, algorithm | PyMOL | Schrödinger, LLC | RRID:SCR_000305 | Version 2.4.0 |
Composition of external solutions with different free Ca2+concentrations used for recording Ca2+ block of inward ILi+.
The indicated free Ca2+ concentrations in the bath solutions were achieved by adjusting the concentrations of CaCl2 and TEA-Cl, calculated using the MaxChelator simulation program (https://somapp.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/pharmacology/bers/maxchelator/).