A β-catenin-driven switch in TCF/LEF transcription factor binding to DNA target sites promotes commitment of mammalian nephron progenitor cells

  1. Qiuyu Guo
  2. Albert D Kim
  3. Bin Li
  4. Andrew Ransick
  5. Helena Bugacov
  6. Xi Chen
  7. Nils O Lindström
  8. Aaron Brown
  9. Leif Oxburgh
  10. Bing Ren
  11. Andrew P McMahon  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  2. 10x Genomics, United States
  3. University of California, San Diego, United States
  4. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, United States
  5. Maine Medical Center Research Institute, United States
  6. The Rogosin Institute, United States

Abstract

The canonical Wnt pathway transcriptional co-activator β-catenin regulates self-renewal and differentiation of mammalian nephron progenitor cells (NPCs). We modulated β-catenin levels in NPC cultures using the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR9902 (CHIR) to examine opposing developmental actions of β-catenin. Low CHIR-mediated maintenance and expansion of NPCs is independent of direct engagement of TCF/LEF/β-catenin transcriptional complexes at low CHIR-dependent cell-cycle targets. In contrast, in high CHIR, TCF7/LEF1/β-catenin complexes replaced TCF7L1/TCF7L2 binding on enhancers of differentiation-promoting target genes. Chromosome confirmation studies showed pre-established promoter-enhancer connections to these target genes in NPCs. High CHIR-associated de novo looping was observed in positive transcriptional feedback regulation to the canonical Wnt pathway. Thus, β-catenin's direct transcriptional role is restricted to the induction of NPCs where rising β-catenin levels switch inhibitory TCF7L1/TCF7L2 complexes to activating LEF1/TCF7 complexes at primed gene targets poised for rapid initiation of a nephrogenic program.

Data availability

All RNA-Seq, ATAC-Seq, ChIP-Seq and HiC data sets are accessible through GEO (GSE131119).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Qiuyu Guo

    Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Albert D Kim

    Sample Preparation, 10x Genomics, Pleasanton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bin Li

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Andrew Ransick

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad-CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Biology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Helena Bugacov

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad-CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Biology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xi Chen

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad-CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Biology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nils O Lindström

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Aaron Brown

    Center for Molecular Medicine, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Scarborough, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Leif Oxburgh

    The Rogosin Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bing Ren

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andrew P McMahon

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad-CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Biology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    amcmahon@med.usc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3779-1729

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK054364 Cell Interaction in Development of the Mammalian Kidney)

  • Andrew P McMahon

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#11893) of the University of Southern California. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Southern California. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2021, Guo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,607
    views
  • 725
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Qiuyu Guo
  2. Albert D Kim
  3. Bin Li
  4. Andrew Ransick
  5. Helena Bugacov
  6. Xi Chen
  7. Nils O Lindström
  8. Aaron Brown
  9. Leif Oxburgh
  10. Bing Ren
  11. Andrew P McMahon
(2021)
A β-catenin-driven switch in TCF/LEF transcription factor binding to DNA target sites promotes commitment of mammalian nephron progenitor cells
eLife 10:e64444.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64444

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64444

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Bin Zhu, Rui Wei ... Pei Liang
    Research Article

    Wing dimorphism is a common phenomenon that plays key roles in the environmental adaptation of aphid; however, the signal transduction in response to environmental cues and the regulation mechanism related to this event remain unknown. Adenosine (A) to inosine (I) RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification that extends transcriptome variety without altering the genome, playing essential roles in numerous biological and physiological processes. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly of the rose-grain aphid Metopolophium dirhodum by using PacBio long HiFi reads and Hi-C technology. The final genome assembly for M. dirhodum is 447.8 Mb, with 98.50% of the assembled sequences anchored to nine chromosomes. The contig and scaffold N50 values are 7.82 and 37.54 Mb, respectively. A total of 18,003 protein-coding genes were predicted, of which 92.05% were functionally annotated. In addition, 11,678 A-to-I RNA-editing sites were systematically identified based on this assembled M. dirhodum genome, and two synonymous A-to-I RNA-editing sites on CYP18A1 were closely associated with transgenerational wing dimorphism induced by crowding. One of these A-to-I RNA-editing sites may prevent the binding of miR-3036-5p to CYP18A1, thus elevating CYP18A1 expression, decreasing 20E titer, and finally regulating the wing dimorphism of offspring. Meanwhile, crowding can also inhibit miR-3036-5p expression and further increase CYP18A1 abundance, resulting in winged offspring. These findings support that A-to-I RNA editing is a dynamic mechanism in the regulation of transgenerational wing dimorphism in aphids and would advance our understanding of the roles of RNA editing in environmental adaptability and phenotypic plasticity.