Evolution of the complex transcription network controlling biofilm formation in Candida species

  1. Eugenio Mancera  Is a corresponding author
  2. Isabel Nocedal
  3. Stephen Hammel
  4. Megha Gulati
  5. Kaitlin F Mitchell
  6. David R Andes
  7. Clarissa J Nobile
  8. Geraldine Butler
  9. Alexander D Johnson
  1. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Unidad Irapuato, Mexico
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  3. University College Cork, Ireland
  4. Cell Press, United States
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
  6. University of Wisconsin, United States
  7. University of California, Merced, United States
  8. Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Ireland
  9. University of California, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

We examine how a complex transcription network composed of seven 'master' regulators and hundreds of target genes evolved over a span of approximately 70 million years. The network controls biofilm formation in several Candida species, a group of fungi that are present in humans both as constituents of the microbiota and as opportunistic pathogens. Using a variety of approaches, we observed two major types of changes that have occurred in the biofilm network since the four extant species we examined last shared a common ancestor. Master regulator 'substitutions' occurred over relatively long evolutionary times, resulting in different species having overlapping, but different sets of master regulators of biofilm formation. Second, massive changes in the connections between the master regulators and their target genes occurred over much shorter timescales. We believe this analysis is the first detailed, empirical description of how a complex transcription network has evolved.

Data availability

ChIP-Seq and microarray gene expression data has been deposited to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository under Superseries GSE160783

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eugenio Mancera

    Departamento de Ingeniería Genética, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Unidad Irapuato, Irapuato, Mexico
    For correspondence
    eugenio.mancera@cinvestav.mx
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0146-8732
  2. Isabel Nocedal

    Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4706-1113
  3. Stephen Hammel

    The School of Computer Sciences and IT, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Megha Gulati

    Molecular Cell, Cell Press, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kaitlin F Mitchell

    Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. David R Andes

    Departments of Medicine and Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Clarissa J Nobile

    Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Merced, Merced, United States
    Competing interests
    Clarissa J Nobile, Clarissa J. Nobile and Alexander D. Johnson are cofounders of BioSynesis, Inc., a company developing diagnostics and therapeutics for biofilm formation..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0799-6499
  8. Geraldine Butler

    School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1770-5301
  9. Alexander D Johnson

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Alexander D Johnson, Clarissa J. Nobile and Alexander D. Johnson are cofounders of BioSynesis, Inc., a company developing diagnostics and therapeutics for biofilm formation..

Funding

Human Frontiers Science Program (LT000484/2012-L)

  • Eugenio Mancera

Pew Biomedical Schoolar Award

  • Clarissa J Nobile

Kamangar family endowed chair

  • Clarissa J Nobile

UC-MEXUS

  • Eugenio Mancera

CONACyT (CB-2016-01 282511)

  • Eugenio Mancera

Wellcome Trust Seed Award in Science (209077/Z/17/Z)

  • Eugenio Mancera

National Institute of Health (Ro1AI083311)

  • Alexander D Johnson

National Institute of Health (Ro1AI049187)

  • Alexander D Johnson

National Institute of Health (Ro1AI073289)

  • David R Andes

National Institute of Health (R35GM124594)

  • Clarissa J Nobile

National Institute of Health (R21AI125801)

  • Clarissa J Nobile

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Wisconsin, Madison (protocol MV1947).

Copyright

© 2021, Mancera et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,146
    views
  • 344
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eugenio Mancera
  2. Isabel Nocedal
  3. Stephen Hammel
  4. Megha Gulati
  5. Kaitlin F Mitchell
  6. David R Andes
  7. Clarissa J Nobile
  8. Geraldine Butler
  9. Alexander D Johnson
(2021)
Evolution of the complex transcription network controlling biofilm formation in Candida species
eLife 10:e64682.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64682

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64682

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Zofia Dubicka, Jarosław Tyszka ... Ulf Bickmeyer
    Research Article

    Living organisms control the formation of mineral skeletons and other structures through biomineralization. Major phylogenetic groups usually consistently follow a single biomineralization pathway. Foraminifera, which are very efficient marine calcifiers, making a substantial contribution to global carbonate production and global carbon sequestration, are regarded as an exception. This phylum has been commonly thought to follow two contrasting models of either in situ ‘mineralization of extracellular matrix’ attributed to hyaline rotaliid shells, or ‘mineralization within intracellular vesicles’ attributed to porcelaneous miliolid shells. Our previous results on rotaliids along with those on miliolids in this paper question such a wide divergence of biomineralization pathways within the same phylum of Foraminifera. We have found under a high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) that precipitation of high-Mg calcitic mesocrystals in porcelaneous shells takes place in situ and form a dense, chaotic meshwork of needle-like crystallites. We have not observed calcified needles that already precipitated in the transported vesicles, what challenges the previous model of miliolid mineralization. Hence, Foraminifera probably utilize less divergent calcification pathways, following the recently discovered biomineralization principles. Mesocrystalline chamber walls in both models are therefore most likely created by intravesicular accumulation of pre-formed liquid amorphous mineral phase deposited and crystallized within the extracellular organic matrix enclosed in a biologically controlled privileged space by active pseudopodial structures. Both calcification pathways evolved independently in the Paleozoic and are well conserved in two clades that represent different chamber formation modes.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Philipp H Schiffer, Paschalis Natsidis ... Maximilian J Telford
    Research Article

    The evolutionary origins of Bilateria remain enigmatic. One of the more enduring proposals highlights similarities between a cnidarian-like planula larva and simple acoel-like flatworms. This idea is based in part on the view of the Xenacoelomorpha as an outgroup to all other bilaterians which are themselves designated the Nephrozoa (protostomes and deuterostomes). Genome data can provide important comparative data and help to understand the evolution and biology of enigmatic species better. Here we assemble and analyse the genome of the simple, marine xenacoelomorph Xenoturbella bocki, a key species for our understanding of early bilaterian evolution. Our highly contiguous genome assembly of X. bocki has a size of ~111 Mbp in 18 chromosome like scaffolds, with repeat content and intron, exon and intergenic space comparable to other bilaterian invertebrates. We find X. bocki to have a similar number of genes to other bilaterians and to have retained ancestral metazoan synteny. Key bilaterian signalling pathways are also largely complete and most bilaterian miRNAs are present. Overall, we conclude that X. bocki has a complex genome typical of bilaterians, which does not reflect the apparent simplicity of its body plan that has been so important to proposals that the Xenacoelomorpha are the simple sister group of the rest of the Bilateria.