Neural network of social interaction observation in marmosets

  1. Justine C Cléry  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yuki Hori
  3. David J Schaeffer
  4. Ravi S Menon
  5. Stefan Everling  Is a corresponding author
  1. Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, Canada
  2. University of Pittsburg, United States

Abstract

A crucial component of social cognition is to observe and understand the social interactions of other individuals. A promising nonhuman primate model for investigating the neural basis of social interaction observation is the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), a small New World primate that shares a rich social repertoire with humans. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquired at 9.4 Tesla to map the brain areas activated by social interaction observation in awake marmosets. We discovered a network of subcortical and cortical areas, predominately in the anterior lateral frontal and medial frontal cortex, that was specifically activated by social interaction observation. This network resembled that recently identified in Old World macaque monkeys (Sliwa and Freiwald, 2017). Our findings suggest that this network is largely conserved between New and Old World primates and support the use of marmosets for studying the neural basis of social cognition.

Data availability

The datasets generated during this study are available at https://github.com/JClery/Social_interaction_paper.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Justine C Cléry

    Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    For correspondence
    jclery@uwo.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1020-1845
  2. Yuki Hori

    Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. David J Schaeffer

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ravi S Menon

    Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Stefan Everling

    Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    For correspondence
    severlin@uwo.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN 148365)

  • Stefan Everling

Canada First Research Excellence Fund (BrainsCAN)

  • Stefan Everling

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thorsten Kahnt, Northwestern University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental methods described were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care policy on the care and use of experimental animals and an ethics protocol #2017-114 approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Western Ontario.Animals were monitoring during the acquisition sessions by a veterinary technician.

Version history

  1. Received: November 18, 2020
  2. Accepted: March 29, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 31, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 6, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Cléry et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,884
    views
  • 289
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Justine C Cléry
  2. Yuki Hori
  3. David J Schaeffer
  4. Ravi S Menon
  5. Stefan Everling
(2021)
Neural network of social interaction observation in marmosets
eLife 10:e65012.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65012

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65012

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.