1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Loss of cortical control over the descending pain modulatory system determines the development of the neuropathic pain state in rats

  1. Robert AR Drake  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kenneth A Steel
  3. Richard Apps
  4. Bridget M Lumb
  5. Anthony E Pickering
  1. School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  2. School of Biosciences, University of Cardiff, United States
  3. Bristol Anaesthesia, Pain & Critical Care Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom
Research Article
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e65156 doi: 10.7554/eLife.65156
5 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Transfected mPFC→PAG neurons arise mainly from the pre-limbic (PrL) cortex.

(A) Intersectional viral vector strategy. We used a retrograde canine adenovirus and Cre-dependent adeno-associated viral vectors to express genetically encoded actuators (both channelrhodopsin-2 [ChR2] and hMD4i) within medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) neurons that project to the periaqueductal grey (PAG). (B) Photomicrograph of mPFC showing labelled neurons residing mainly in the PrL cortex. (C) PrL cortex with colocalisation of mCherry (hM4Di) and EYFP (ChR2) in neurons projecting to PAG (many examples but several marked with white arrows). (D) Conjunction plot illustrating location of mPFC→PAG neurons throughout the mPFC (n=3 rats). Darker shading indicates positional overlap of positively labelled (hM4Di) neurons from more than one animal (light=1 animal, mid=2, and dark=3). Dotted red line demarks the PrL cortex. (E) Comparative distribution of mPFC→PAG neurons throughout the cortex (mean ± SEM). (F) Photomicrograph showing ChR2-EYFP and hM4Di-mCherry containing fibres from mPFC projecting to the ventrolateral region of PAG (many examples but several marked with white arrows).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
There was negligible expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-EYP and hM4Di-mCherry in control animals that did not receive CAV–CMV–CRE into the periaqueductal grey.

Photomicrograph of medial prefrontal cortex showing negligible expression of ChR2-EYFP (A) or hM4Di-mCherry (B) in PrL.Control rats.

PrL-P neurons bidirectionally regulate nociception in naive rats.

(A) Experimental timeline. (B) Illumination of PrL (445 nm, 20 Hz, 10–15 mW, 10 ms pulse, concomitant with hind-paw heating) in NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats increased thermal withdrawal latencies of the ipsilateral hindpaw but not in NaivePrL.Control rats that did not express channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2; paired t-test, t(9)=3.37, p=0.008, n=10 for ChR2:hM4Di group; t(6)=0.63, p=0.55, n=7 for control group). (C) Equivalent illumination of PrL had no effect on the thermal withdrawal latency of the contralateral hindpaw in either NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di or NaivePrL.Control rats (paired t-test, t(9)=0.86, p=0.40, n=10 for NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats; t(6)=0.14, p=0.90, n=7 for NaivePrL.Control rats). (D) Optic fibre tip locations in the medial prefrontal cortex from NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di (●) and NaivePrL.Control (○) rats. For simplicity, fibre placements are depicted in a single hemisphere. (E) Systemic CNO (2.5 mg·kg−1 i.p.) in NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats decreased withdrawal latencies (mean value at 20–40 min post-injection) of the ipsilateral paw but not in NaivePrL.Control rats (paired t-test, t(14)=3.26, p=0.006, n=15 for NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats; t(6)=0.63, p=0.55, n=7 for NaivePrL.Control rats). (F) CNO had no effect on the thermal withdrawal latency of the contralateral hindpaw in either NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats or NaivePrL.Control rats (paired t-test, t(14)=1.22, p=0.24, n=15 for NaivePrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats; t(6)=0.43 p=0.68, n=7 for NaivePrL.Control rats).

Figure 3 with 2 supplements
Inhibition of PrL-P neurons unmasks hypersensitivity in neuropathic rats.

(A) Experimental timeline. (B) Tibial nerve transection (TNT) was used to produce the neuropathic injury. (C)- Sensory testing was conducted at 30 min after systemic delivery of CNO and (D) testing was conducted on the lateral plantar surface of the hindpaw in a receptive field adjacent to injured tibial nerve. (E) In TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats, CNO (2.5 mg·kg−1 i.p.) reduced the mechanical withdrawal threshold at 3 and 7 days post nerve injury on the ipsilateral (injured) hindpaw (two-way ANOVA, main effect CNO, F(1,30)=20.09, p=0.0001; timexCNO, F(2, 60)=6.892, p=0.002; Sidak’s post-test day 3, p=0.008; day 7, p=0.001, n = 16) and (F) on the contralateral paw at 3 days post-injury (two-way ANOVA, CNO F(1,30)=5.77, p=0.02; Sidak’s post-test, p=0.02, n = 16). (G and H) In TNTPrL.Control rats, the same dose of CNO did not alter mechanical withdrawal thresholds on either the ipsilateral or contralateral hindpaw (two-way ANOVA, main effect; ipsilateral CNO, F(1,14)=0.02, p=0.90, n=8 and contralateral CNO, F(1,14)=0.15, p=0.71, n=8, respectively). (I and J) In TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats, CNO increased acetone-evoked nocifensive events at 3 days post-injury on the ipsilateral paw (two-way ANOVA, main effect CNO, F(1,30)=9.6, p=0.004; Sidak’s post-test, p=0.003, n=16) but not contralaterally (two-way ANOVA, main effect CNO, F(1,29)=1.3, p=0.26, n=16). (K and I) In TNTPrL.Control rats, CNO did not alter acetone-evoked nocicfensive behaviour (two-way ANOVA, main effect CNO ipsilateral, F(1,12)=0.02, p=0.89, n=7 and main effect CNO contralateral, F(1,12)=2.2, p=0.16, n=7).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Chemo-inhibition of PrL-P neurons affects nocicfensive behaviour in early but not late timepoints post-injury in neuropathic animals.

(A) In TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats, systemic delivery of CNO (2.5 mg·kg−1 i.p.) significantly reduced the mechanical withdrawal threshold at 3 and 7 days post-injury on the ipsilateral (injured) hindpaw (mixed model [REML], fixed effects CNO, F(1,28)=7.26, p=0.002; timexCNO, F(5,95)=4.92, p=0.0005; Sidak’s post-test, *p<0.05, n=16). (B) In TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats, systemic delivery of CNO (2.5 mg·kg−1 i.p.) significantly increased the cold (acetone)-evoked nocicfensive events at 3 days post-injury on the ipsilateral (injured) hindpaw (mixed model [REML], fixed effects CNO, F(1,30)=6.3, p=0.02; timexCNO, F(5,98)=0.6, p=0.70; Sidak’s post-test, ***p=0.0006, n=16).

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Delivery of vehicle does not affect sensitisation in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats at 7 days post-TNT.

Delivery of vehicle (sterile saline with 5% DMSO, i.p.) didnot alter mechanical withdrawal thresholds (paired t-test, t=0.4, n=3) (A) or cold-evoked nocicfensive behaviour (paired t-test, t=0.86, (B) in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats [n = 3]).

Inhibition of PrL-P neurons produces aversion in neuropathic animals.

(A) Conditioned place aversion protocol. (B) Example heatmap visualisation of the time spent within the testing chambers prior (top) and following conditioning with CNO or vehicle. (C) Group data showing conditioning with CNO in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats 2–5 days after tibial nerve transection (TNT) produced place aversion (paired t-test, t(7)=2.43, p=0.04, n=8). (D) CNO administration to TNTPrL.Control rats did not produce place aversion (paired t-test, t(8)=0.25, p=0.81, n=9).

Activation of PrL-P neurons produces antinociception in neuropathic rats by inhibition at a spinal level.

(A) Experimental timeline. (B) Delivery of blue light (445 nm, 20 Hz, 10–15 mW, 10 ms pulse, concomitant with hind-paw stimulation) produced a significant increase in mechanical withdrawal threshold of the injured (ipsilateral) hind-paw in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats (repeated-measures [RM] ANOVA, treatment, F(1.12, 8.96)=8.07, p=0.02; Sidak’s post-test, *p<0.05, n=9) but not in TNTPrL.Controlrats (RM ANOVA, treatment, F(1, 2)=0.35, p=0.61, n=3). (C) Example raw data trace illustrating suppression of von Frey hair evoked spinal dorsal horn neuron activity during blue light (420 nm, 10–15 mW, 10 ms duration, concomitant with hind-paw stimulation) delivery to the PrL in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats (arrows demark beginning and end of stimulus). (D) Group data illustrating suppression of 4 g evoked spinal dorsal horn neuronal activity by illumination of the PrL in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats (mixed model [REML], fixed effect opto-activation, F[1.99, 13.98]=7.18, p=0.007; Dunnet’s post-test baseline vs opto-activation, p=0.009, n=10). (E) Illumination of the PrL in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats also supressed 15 g evoked spinal dorsal horn neuronal activity (mixed model [REML], fixed effect opto-activation, F(1.52, 10.64)=2.94, p=0.10, Dunnet’s post-test baseline vs opto-activation, p=0.046, n=10.) (F) Delivery of blue light to the Prl in TNTPrL.ChR2:hM4Di rats decreased acetone-evoked spinal dorsal horn neuronal activity (paired t-test, t(3)=3.58, p=0.04, n=4).

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species)
or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain backgroundWistar (rat)
male
Envigo, NLRCCHan
Transfected constructCanine adenoviralvectorIGMM, FRCAV2-CMV-CRE
Transfected constructAdeno-associatedviral vectorUNC Vector Core, USAAAV2-EF1a-DIO-
hChR2-EYFP
Transfected constructAdeno-associatedviral vectorAddgene, USAAAV2-hSyn-DIO-
hM4Di-mCherry
Chemical compoundClozepine-N-oxideTocris Bioscience, UK4936
AntibodyAnti-GFP (chicken polyclonal)Abcam, USAAb13970(1:5000)
AntibodyAnti-mCherry (rabbit polyclonal)BioVision5993(1:2000)
OtherOptic fibreOptogenix, ITLambda-BNA 0.66, length 4.4 mm, and
light-emitting length 2 mm
OtherQ-probesNeuronexus, USAQ1 × 1-tet-10mm-121-Q4
OtherHeadstage chipIntan Technologies, USARHD2132
OtherDiode laserOmricon Laserage, DELuxX445-100445 nm/100 mW
OtherOpenEphys Acquisition SystemOpenEphys, USA
Software, algorithmOpenEphys GUIOpenEphys, USA
Software, algorithmEthovisionXTNoldus, NL
Software, algorithmPrismGraphPad, USA
Software, algorithmGNU Image Manipulation ProgramGIMP, USA
Software, algorithmBORIS event logging softwareBORIS, IT

Data availability

All data generated or analysed are included in the manuscript.

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)