CD8+ T cell self-tolerance permits responsiveness but limits tissue damage

  1. Emily N Truckenbrod
  2. Kristina S Burrack
  3. Todd P Knutson
  4. Henrique Borges da Silva
  5. Katharine E Block
  6. Stephen D O'Flanagan
  7. Katie R Stagliano
  8. Arthur A Hurwitz
  9. Ross B Fulton
  10. Kristin R Renkema  Is a corresponding author
  11. Stephen C Jameson  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota Medical School, United States
  2. NIH, United States
  3. Agentus Therapeutics, United States
  4. Grand Valley State University, United States

Abstract

Self-specific CD8+ T cells can escape clonal deletion, but the properties and capabilities of such cells in a physiological setting are unclear. We characterized polyclonal CD8+ T cells specific for the melanocyte antigen tyrosinase-related protein 2 (Trp2) in mice expressing or lacking this enzyme (due to deficiency in Dct, which encodes Trp2). Phenotypic and gene expression profiles of pre-immune Trp2/Kb-specific cells were similar; the size of this population was only slightly reduced in wild-type (WT) compared to Dct-deficient (Dct-/-) mice. Despite comparable initial responses to Trp2 immunization, WT Trp2/Kb-specific cells showed blunted expansion and less readily differentiated into a CD25+ proliferative population. Functional self-tolerance clearly emerged when assessing immunopathology: adoptively transferred WT Trp2/Kb-specific cells mediated vitiligo much less efficiently. Hence, CD8+ T cell self-specificity is poorly predicted by precursor frequency, phenotype or even initial responsiveness, while deficient activation-induced CD25 expression and other gene expression characteristics may help to identify functionally tolerant cells.

Data availability

NextGen sequencing data has being deposited at GEO: Code GSE171221.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Emily N Truckenbrod

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3819-6307
  2. Kristina S Burrack

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Todd P Knutson

    Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8431-9964
  4. Henrique Borges da Silva

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Katharine E Block

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Stephen D O'Flanagan

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Katie R Stagliano

    NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Arthur A Hurwitz

    Immunology, Agentus Therapeutics, Lexington, United States
    Competing interests
    Arthur A Hurwitz, Arthur A Hurwitz is affiliated with AgenTus Therapeutics, Inc. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  9. Ross B Fulton

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    Ross B Fulton, Ross B. Fulton is affiliated with HiFiBio, Inc. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  10. Kristin R Renkema

    Grand Valley State University, Allendale, United States
    For correspondence
    renkemak@gvsu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Stephen C Jameson

    Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    james024@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9137-1146

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI140631)

  • Stephen C Jameson

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI035296)

  • Stephen C Jameson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gabrielle T Belz, The University of Queensland, Australia

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and handled according to protocols approved but the University of Minnesota IACUC (#1709-35136A and #2007-38243A).

Version history

  1. Received: December 9, 2020
  2. Accepted: April 29, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 30, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 21, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,248
    views
  • 223
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Emily N Truckenbrod
  2. Kristina S Burrack
  3. Todd P Knutson
  4. Henrique Borges da Silva
  5. Katharine E Block
  6. Stephen D O'Flanagan
  7. Katie R Stagliano
  8. Arthur A Hurwitz
  9. Ross B Fulton
  10. Kristin R Renkema
  11. Stephen C Jameson
(2021)
CD8+ T cell self-tolerance permits responsiveness but limits tissue damage
eLife 10:e65615.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65615

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65615

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Xiuyuan Lu, Hiroki Hayashi ... Sho Yamasaki
    Research Article

    SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been used worldwide to combat COVID-19 pandemic. To elucidate the factors that determine the longevity of spike (S)-specific antibodies, we traced the characteristics of S-specific T cell clonotypes together with their epitopes and anti-S antibody titers before and after BNT162b2 vaccination over time. T cell receptor (TCR) αβ sequences and mRNA expression of the S-responded T cells were investigated using single-cell TCR- and RNA-sequencing. Highly expanded 199 TCR clonotypes upon stimulation with S peptide pools were reconstituted into a reporter T cell line for the determination of epitopes and restricting HLAs. Among them, we could determine 78 S epitopes, most of which were conserved in variants of concern (VOCs). After the 2nd vaccination, T cell clonotypes highly responsive to recall S stimulation were polarized to follicular helper T (Tfh)-like cells in donors exhibiting sustained anti-S antibody titers (designated as ‘sustainers’), but not in ‘decliners’. Even before vaccination, S-reactive CD4+ T cell clonotypes did exist, most of which cross-reacted with environmental or symbiotic microbes. However, these clonotypes contracted after vaccination. Conversely, S-reactive clonotypes dominated after vaccination were undetectable in pre-vaccinated T cell pool, suggesting that highly responding S-reactive T cells were established by vaccination from rare clonotypes. These results suggest that de novo acquisition of memory Tfh-like cells upon vaccination may contribute to the longevity of anti-S antibody titers.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Rajan M Thomas, Matthew C Pahl ... Andrew D Wells
    Research Article

    Ikaros is a transcriptional factor required for conventional T cell development, differentiation, and anergy. While the related factors Helios and Eos have defined roles in regulatory T cells (Treg), a role for Ikaros has not been established. To determine the function of Ikaros in the Treg lineage, we generated mice with Treg-specific deletion of the Ikaros gene (Ikzf1). We find that Ikaros cooperates with Foxp3 to establish a major portion of the Treg epigenome and transcriptome. Ikaros-deficient Treg exhibit Th1-like gene expression with abnormal production of IL-2, IFNg, TNFa, and factors involved in Wnt and Notch signaling. While Ikzf1-Treg-cko mice do not develop spontaneous autoimmunity, Ikaros-deficient Treg are unable to control conventional T cell-mediated immune pathology in response to TCR and inflammatory stimuli in models of IBD and organ transplantation. These studies establish Ikaros as a core factor required in Treg for tolerance and the control of inflammatory immune responses.