Specialized coding patterns among dorsomedial prefrontal neuronal ensembles predict conditioned reward seeking

Abstract

Non-overlapping cell populations within dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), defined by gene expression or projection target, control dissociable aspects of reward seeking through unique activity patterns. However, even within these defined cell populations considerable cell-to-cell variability is found, suggesting that greater resolution is needed to understand information processing in dmPFC. Here we use two-photon calcium imaging in awake, behaving mice to monitor the activity of dmPFC excitatory neurons throughout Pavlovian reward conditioning. We characterize five unique neuronal ensembles that each encode specialized information related to a sucrose reward, reward-predictive cues, and behavioral responses to those cues. The ensembles differentially emerge across daily training sessions - and stabilize after learning - in a manner that improves the predictive validity of dmPFC activity dynamics for deciphering variables related to behavioral conditioning. Our results characterize the complex dmPFC neuronal ensemble dynamics that stably predict reward availability and initiation of conditioned reward seeking following cue-reward learning.

Data availability

All data generated for this study are available on Dryad Digital Repository, accessible here: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xksn02vg8. We are in the process of uploading raw videos for these data to the Image Data Resource (https://idr.openmicroscopy.org/), as there is a 3 week lead time to get the data uploaded and special considerations are required for datasets of >1TB. Code will be uploaded to GitHub upon publication. All data, code, and raw imaging files will be uploaded to these open-source repositories prior to publication.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Roger I Grant

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elizabeth M Doncheck

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kelsey M Vollmer

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kion T Winston

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Elizaveta V Romanova

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Preston N Siegler

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Heather Holman

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher W Bowen

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. James M Otis

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    For correspondence
    otis@musc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0953-9283

Funding

National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01-DA051650)

  • James M Otis

MUSC Cocaine and Opioid Center on Addiction Pilot Award (P50-DA046374)

  • Roger I Grant

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mario Penzo, National Institute of Mental Health, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were performed in the dark phase and in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Medical University of South Carolina (Approval ID: IACUC-2018-00363; Renewed November 30, 2020).

Version history

  1. Received: December 15, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 22, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 29, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 13, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Grant et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,307
    views
  • 325
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Roger I Grant
  2. Elizabeth M Doncheck
  3. Kelsey M Vollmer
  4. Kion T Winston
  5. Elizaveta V Romanova
  6. Preston N Siegler
  7. Heather Holman
  8. Christopher W Bowen
  9. James M Otis
(2021)
Specialized coding patterns among dorsomedial prefrontal neuronal ensembles predict conditioned reward seeking
eLife 10:e65764.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65764

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65764

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aedan Yue Li, Natalia Ladyka-Wojcik ... Morgan Barense
    Research Article

    Combining information from multiple senses is essential to object recognition, core to the ability to learn concepts, make new inferences, and generalize across distinct entities. Yet how the mind combines sensory input into coherent crossmodal representations - the crossmodal binding problem - remains poorly understood. Here, we applied multi-echo fMRI across a four-day paradigm, in which participants learned 3-dimensional crossmodal representations created from well-characterized unimodal visual shape and sound features. Our novel paradigm decoupled the learned crossmodal object representations from their baseline unimodal shapes and sounds, thus allowing us to track the emergence of crossmodal object representations as they were learned by healthy adults. Critically, we found that two anterior temporal lobe structures - temporal pole and perirhinal cortex - differentiated learned from non-learned crossmodal objects, even when controlling for the unimodal features that composed those objects. These results provide evidence for integrated crossmodal object representations in the anterior temporal lobes that were different from the representations for the unimodal features. Furthermore, we found that perirhinal cortex representations were by default biased towards visual shape, but this initial visual bias was attenuated by crossmodal learning. Thus, crossmodal learning transformed perirhinal representations such that they were no longer predominantly grounded in the visual modality, which may be a mechanism by which object concepts gain their abstraction.