Abstract

The hippocampal dentate gyrus is an important relay conveying sensory information from the entorhinal cortex to the hippocampus proper. During exploration, the dentate gyrus has been proposed to act as a pattern separator. However, the dentate gyrus also shows structured activity during immobility and sleep. The properties of these activity patterns at cellular resolution, and their role in hippocampal-dependent memory processes have remained unclear. Using dual-color in-vivo two-photon Ca2+ imaging, we show that in immobile mice dentate granule cells generate sparse, synchronized activity patterns associated with entorhinal cortex activation. These population events are structured and modified by changes in the environment; and they incorporate place- and speed cells. Importantly, they are more similar than expected by chance to population patterns evoked during self-motion. Using optogenetic inhibition, we show that granule cell activity is not only required during exploration, but also during immobility in order to form dentate gyrus-dependent spatial memories.

Data availability

Binarized imaging traces of all cells from all experiment sessions are available on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mkkwh70z6.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Martin Pofahl

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9473-6195
  2. Negar Nikbakht

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. André N Haubrich

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7895-6203
  4. Theresa M Nguyen

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicola Masala

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fabian J Distler

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Oliver Braganza

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8508-1070
  8. Jakob H Macke

    Excellence Cluster Machine Learning, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5154-8912
  9. Laura A Ewell

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kurtulus Golcuk

    Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn Medical Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Heinz Beck

    IEECR, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    heinz.beck@ukbonn.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8961-998X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1089,Project C04)

  • Heinz Beck

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2064/1 PN 390727645)

  • Jakob H Macke
  • Heinz Beck

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (PSI)

  • Kurtulus Golcuk

Volkswagen Foundation

  • Oliver Braganza
  • Laura A Ewell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with European (2010/63/EU) and federal law (TierSchG, TierSchVersV) on animal care and use and approved by the county of North-Rhine Westphalia (LANUV AZ 84-02.04.2015.A524, AZ 81-02.04.2019.A216).

Copyright

© 2021, Pofahl et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,201
    views
  • 503
    downloads
  • 31
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Martin Pofahl
  2. Negar Nikbakht
  3. André N Haubrich
  4. Theresa M Nguyen
  5. Nicola Masala
  6. Fabian J Distler
  7. Oliver Braganza
  8. Jakob H Macke
  9. Laura A Ewell
  10. Kurtulus Golcuk
  11. Heinz Beck
(2021)
Synchronous activity patterns in the dentate gyrus during immobility
eLife 10:e65786.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65786

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65786

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Cristina Gil Avila, Elisabeth S May ... Markus Ploner
    Research Article

    Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition whose neural mechanisms are incompletely understood. An imbalance of cerebral excitation and inhibition (E/I), particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), is believed to represent a crucial mechanism in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Thus, identifying a non-invasive, scalable marker of E/I could provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of chronic pain and aid in developing clinically useful biomarkers. Recently, the aperiodic component of the electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum has been proposed to represent a non-invasive proxy for E/I. We, therefore, assessed the aperiodic component in the mPFC of resting-state EEG recordings in 149 people with chronic pain and 115 healthy participants. We found robust evidence against differences in the aperiodic component in the mPFC between people with chronic pain and healthy participants, and no correlation between the aperiodic component and pain intensity. These findings were consistent across different subtypes of chronic pain and were similarly found in a whole-brain analysis. Their robustness was supported by preregistration and multiverse analyses across many different methodological choices. Together, our results suggest that the EEG aperiodic component does not differentiate between people with chronic pain and healthy individuals. These findings and the rigorous methodological approach can guide future studies investigating non-invasive, scalable markers of cerebral dysfunction in people with chronic pain and beyond.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ankur Sinha, Padraig Gleeson ... Robin Angus Silver
    Tools and Resources

    Data-driven models of neurons and circuits are important for understanding how the properties of membrane conductances, synapses, dendrites, and the anatomical connectivity between neurons generate the complex dynamical behaviors of brain circuits in health and disease. However, the inherent complexity of these biological processes makes the construction and reuse of biologically detailed models challenging. A wide range of tools have been developed to aid their construction and simulation, but differences in design and internal representation act as technical barriers to those who wish to use data-driven models in their research workflows. NeuroML, a model description language for computational neuroscience, was developed to address this fragmentation in modeling tools. Since its inception, NeuroML has evolved into a mature community standard that encompasses a wide range of model types and approaches in computational neuroscience. It has enabled the development of a large ecosystem of interoperable open-source software tools for the creation, visualization, validation, and simulation of data-driven models. Here, we describe how the NeuroML ecosystem can be incorporated into research workflows to simplify the construction, testing, and analysis of standardized models of neural systems, and supports the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles, thus promoting open, transparent and reproducible science.