Naa12 compensates for Naa10 in mice in the amino-terminal acetylation pathway

  1. Hyae Yon Kweon
  2. Mi-Ni Lee  Is a corresponding author
  3. Max Dorfel
  4. Seungwoon Seo
  5. Leah Gottlieb
  6. Thomas PaPazyan
  7. Nina McTiernan
  8. Rasmus Ree
  9. David Bolton
  10. Andrew Garcia
  11. Michael Flory
  12. Jonathan Crain
  13. Alison Sebold
  14. Scott Lyons
  15. Ahmed Ismail
  16. Elaine Marchi
  17. Seong-keun Sonn
  18. Se-Jin Jeong
  19. Sejin Jeon
  20. Shinyeong Ju
  21. Simon J Conway
  22. Taesoo Kim
  23. Hyun-Seok Kim
  24. Cheolju Lee
  25. Tae-Young Roh
  26. Thomas Arnesen
  27. Ronen Marmorstein
  28. Gootaeg Oh  Is a corresponding author
  29. Gholson J Lyon  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ewha Womans University, Republic of Korea
  2. Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States
  3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  4. University of Bergen, Norway
  5. Department of Molecular Biology, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, United States
  6. New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, United States
  7. Washington University School of Medicine, United States
  8. Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  9. Indiana University School of Medicine, United States
  10. Pohang University of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  11. George A Jervis Clinic, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, United States

Abstract

Amino-terminal acetylation is catalyzed by a set of N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs). The NatA complex (including X-linked Naa10 and Naa15) is the major acetyltransferase, with 40-50% of all mammalian proteins being potential substrates. However, the overall role of amino-terminal acetylation on a whole-organism level is poorly understood, particularly in mammals. Male mice lacking Naa10 show no globally apparent in vivo amino-terminal acetylation impairment and do not exhibit complete embryonic lethality. Rather Naa10 nulls display increased neonatal lethality, and the majority of surviving undersized mutants exhibit a combination of hydrocephaly, cardiac defects, homeotic anterior transformation, piebaldism and urogenital anomalies. Naa12 is a previously unannotated Naa10-like paralogue with NAT activity that genetically compensates for Naa10. Mice deficient for Naa12 have no apparent phenotype, whereas mice deficient for Naa10 and Naa12 display embryonic lethality. The discovery of Naa12 adds to the currently known machinery involved in amino-terminal acetylation in mice.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.Mass spectrometry data were uploaded to PRIDE under Project Name: Naa10 mutant mouse N-terminome LC-MS, Project accession: PXD026410.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hyae Yon Kweon

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences,, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mi-Ni Lee

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    minilee@kribb.re.kr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Max Dorfel

    Genetics, Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Woodbury, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Seungwoon Seo

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences,, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Leah Gottlieb

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas PaPazyan

    Genetics, Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Woodbury, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nina McTiernan

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1749-6933
  8. Rasmus Ree

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. David Bolton

    Department of Molecular Biology, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew Garcia

    Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Michael Flory

    Research Design and Analysis Service, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jonathan Crain

    Genetics, Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Woodbury, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Alison Sebold

    Genetics, Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Woodbury, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Scott Lyons

    Genetics, Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Woodbury, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Ahmed Ismail

    Genetics, Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Woodbury, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Elaine Marchi

    Human Genetics, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Seong-keun Sonn

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences,, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Se-Jin Jeong

    Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6375-5334
  19. Sejin Jeon

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences,, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3819-3421
  20. Shinyeong Ju

    Center for Theragnosis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5483-4690
  21. Simon J Conway

    Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianopolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Taesoo Kim

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3902-1058
  23. Hyun-Seok Kim

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences,, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Cheolju Lee

    Center for Theragnosis, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8482-4696
  25. Tae-Young Roh

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5833-0844
  26. Thomas Arnesen

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Ronen Marmorstein

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4373-4752
  28. Gootaeg Oh

    Department of Life Science and College of Natural Sciences,, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    gootaeg@ewha.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  29. Gholson J Lyon

    Human Genetics, George A Jervis Clinic, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, United States
    For correspondence
    gholsonjlyon@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5869-0716

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (2020R1A3B2079811)

  • Gootaeg Oh

Norwegian Cancer Society (PR-2009-0222)

  • Thomas Arnesen

National Research Foundation of Korea (2017RIDIAB03032286)

  • Mi-Ni Lee

National Research Foundation of Korea (2020RICIC1007686)

  • Mi-Ni Lee

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133408)

  • Gholson J Lyon

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118090)

  • Ronen Marmorstein

Research Council of Norway (Project 249843)

  • Thomas Arnesen

National Institutes of Health (Project 249843)

  • Simon J Conway

Norwegian Health Authorities of Western Norway (912176)

  • Thomas Arnesen

Norwegian Health Authorities of Western Norway (F-12540-D11382)

  • Thomas Arnesen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Hening Lin, Cornell University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines of International Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Ewha Womans University (protocol #18 012)012), Cold Spring Harbor L aboratory (CSHL) protocol # 579961 18 , and Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities (IBR) (protocol #456).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 20, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 20, 2020
  3. Accepted: August 5, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 6, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 11, 2021 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: August 19, 2021 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Kweon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,216
    views
  • 160
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hyae Yon Kweon
  2. Mi-Ni Lee
  3. Max Dorfel
  4. Seungwoon Seo
  5. Leah Gottlieb
  6. Thomas PaPazyan
  7. Nina McTiernan
  8. Rasmus Ree
  9. David Bolton
  10. Andrew Garcia
  11. Michael Flory
  12. Jonathan Crain
  13. Alison Sebold
  14. Scott Lyons
  15. Ahmed Ismail
  16. Elaine Marchi
  17. Seong-keun Sonn
  18. Se-Jin Jeong
  19. Sejin Jeon
  20. Shinyeong Ju
  21. Simon J Conway
  22. Taesoo Kim
  23. Hyun-Seok Kim
  24. Cheolju Lee
  25. Tae-Young Roh
  26. Thomas Arnesen
  27. Ronen Marmorstein
  28. Gootaeg Oh
  29. Gholson J Lyon
(2021)
Naa12 compensates for Naa10 in mice in the amino-terminal acetylation pathway
eLife 10:e65952.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65952

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65952

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Zhuqing Wang, Yue Wang ... Wei Yan
    Research Article

    Despite rapid evolution across eutherian mammals, the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs are located in a region flanked by two highly conserved protein-coding genes (SLITRK2 and FMR1) on the X chromosome. Intriguingly, these miRNAs are predominantly expressed in the testis, suggesting a potential role in spermatogenesis and male fertility. Here, we report that the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs were derived from the MER91C DNA transposons. Selective inactivation of individual miRNAs or clusters caused no discernible defects, but simultaneous ablation of five clusters containing 19 members of the MIR-506 family led to reduced male fertility in mice. Despite normal sperm counts, motility, and morphology, the KO sperm were less competitive than wild-type sperm when subjected to a polyandrous mating scheme. Transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses revealed that these X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs, in addition to targeting a set of conserved genes, have more targets that are critical for spermatogenesis and embryonic development during evolution. Our data suggest that the MIR-506 family miRNAs function to enhance sperm competitiveness and reproductive fitness of the male by finetuning gene expression during spermatogenesis.