1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Fully autonomous mouse behavioral and optogenetic experiments in home-cage

  1. Yaoyao Hao
  2. Alyse Marian Thomas
  3. Nuo Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
Tools and Resources
  • Cited 2
  • Views 1,984
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e66112 doi: 10.7554/eLife.66112

Abstract

Goal-directed behaviors involve distributed brain networks. The small size of the mouse brain makes it amenable to manipulations of neural activity dispersed across brain areas, but existing optogenetic methods serially test a few brain regions at a time, which slows comprehensive mapping of distributed networks. Laborious operant conditioning training required for most experimental paradigms exacerbates this bottleneck. We present an autonomous workflow to survey the involvement of brain regions at scale during operant behaviors in mice. Naïve mice living in a home-cage system learned voluntary head-fixation (>1 hour/day) and performed difficult decision-making tasks, including contingency reversals, for 2 months without human supervision. We incorporated an optogenetic approach to manipulate activity in deep brain regions through intact skull during home-cage behavior. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we tested dozens of mice in parallel unsupervised optogenetic experiments, revealing multiple regions in cortex, striatum, and superior colliculus involved in tactile decision-making.

Data availability

All hardware design files and software for the construction of automated home-cage system are made available, along with documentations and protocols for automated head-fixation training and task training.<https://github.com/NuoLiLabBCM/Autocage>Source data and code are also available at the same Github repository.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yaoyao Hao

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alyse Marian Thomas

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nuo Li

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    nuol@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6613-5018

Funding

Robert and Janice McNair Foundation

  • Nuo Li

McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience

  • Nuo Li

Whitehall Foundation

  • Nuo Li

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

  • Nuo Li

Searle Scholars Program

  • Nuo Li

Pew Charitable Trusts

  • Nuo Li

National Institutes of Health (NS112312)

  • Nuo Li

National Institutes of Health (NS104781)

  • Nuo Li

National Institutes of Health (NS113110)

  • Nuo Li

Simons Foundation (Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain,543005)

  • Nuo Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Baylor College of Medicine (protocol AN7012). All surgical procedures were carried out aseptically under 1-2 % isoflurane anesthesia. Buprenorphine Sustained Release (1 mg/kg) and Meloxicam Sustained Release (4mg/kg) were used for pre- and post-operative analgesia.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Brice Bathellier, CNRS, France

Publication history

  1. Received: December 29, 2020
  2. Accepted: May 2, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 4, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 12, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Hao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,984
    Page views
  • 230
    Downloads
  • 2
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhengchao Xu et al.
    Tools and Resources Updated

    The dorsal raphe nucleus (DR) and median raphe nucleus (MR) contain populations of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons that regulate diverse behavioral functions. However, their whole-brain input-output circuits remain incompletely elucidated. We used viral tracing combined with fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography to generate a comprehensive whole-brain atlas of inputs and outputs of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the DR and MR. We found that these neurons received inputs from similar upstream brain regions. The glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the same raphe nucleus had divergent projection patterns with differences in critical brain regions. Specifically, MR glutamatergic neurons projected to the lateral habenula through multiple pathways. Correlation and cluster analysis revealed that glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the same raphe nucleus received heterogeneous inputs and sent different collateral projections. This connectivity atlas further elucidates the anatomical architecture of the raphe nuclei, which could facilitate better understanding of their behavioral functions.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shankar Ramachandran et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Neuromodulators promote adaptive behaviors that are often complex and involve concerted activity changes across circuits that are often not physically connected. It is not well understood how neuromodulatory systems accomplish these tasks. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans NLP-12 neuropeptide system shapes responses to food availability by modulating the activity of head and body wall motor neurons through alternate G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, CKR-1 and CKR-2. We show ckr-2 deletion reduces body bend depth during movement under basal conditions. We demonstrate CKR-1 is a functional NLP-12 receptor and define its expression in the nervous system. In contrast to basal locomotion, biased CKR-1 GPCR stimulation of head motor neurons promotes turning during local searching. Deletion of ckr-1 reduces head neuron activity and diminishes turning while specific ckr-1 overexpression or head neuron activation promote turning. Thus, our studies suggest locomotor responses to changing food availability are regulated through conditional NLP-12 stimulation of head or body wall motor circuits.