Visualizing synaptic plasticity in vivo by large-scale imaging of endogenous AMPA receptors
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States
- Johns Hopkins University, United States
Abstract
Elucidating how synaptic molecules such as AMPA receptors mediate neuronal communication and tracking their dynamic expression during behavior is crucial to understand cognition and disease, but current technological barriers preclude large-scale exploration of molecular dynamics in vivo. We have developed a suite of innovative methodologies that break through these barriers: a new knockin mouse line with fluorescently tagged endogenous AMPA receptors, two-photon imaging of hundreds of thousands of labeled synapses in behaving mice, and computer-vision-based automatic synapse detection. Using these tools, we can longitudinally track how the strength of populations of synapses changes during behavior. We used this approach to generate an unprecedentedly detailed spatiotemporal map of synapses undergoing changes in strength following sensory experience. More generally, these tools can be used as an optical probe capable of measuring functional synapse strength across entire brain areas during any behavioral paradigm, describing complex system-wide changes with molecular precision.
Data availability
We have provided Source data for our Figures and deposited the remaining data to Dryad with doi:10.5061/dryad.ttdz08m0b. All code used to analyze and process data is freely available on GitHub, with links specified in the manuscript.
-
Raw data for Graves et. al 2021 eLifeDryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.ttdz08m0b.
Article and author information
Author details
Joshua T Vogelstein
Funding
National Institutes of Health (R21 AG063193)
- Austin R Graves
- Richard L Huganir
Kavli Foundation
- Austin R Graves
- Alina C Spiegel
- Daniel J Tward
National Institutes of Health (R01 MH123212)
- Austin R Graves
- Alexei M Bygrave
- Michael I Miller
- Richard L Huganir
Schmidt Science Nascent Innovation Grant (1)
- Austin R Graves
- Joshua T Vogelstein
- Richard L Huganir
National Institutes of Health (K99 MH124920)
- Alexei M Bygrave
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: These studies were conducted in accordance with US Public Health Service on Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (PHS Policy) and all procedures involving animals were approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) protocols (MO19M274, MO20M372, MO20M92, MO20M336). All surgeries were performed under isoflourane anesthesia. Every effort was made to reduce or eliminate pain and suffering during all surgical procedures, in vivo imaging sessions, and behavioral experiments.
Copyright
© 2021, Graves et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 8,161
- views
-
- 1,061
- downloads
-
- 42
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Visualizing synaptic plasticity in vivo by large-scale imaging of endogenous AMPA receptors
eLife 10:e66809.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66809
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
During delayed ballistic reaches, motor areas consistently display movement-specific activity patterns prior to movement onset. It is unclear why these patterns arise: while they have been proposed to seed an initial neural state from which the movement unfolds, recent experiments have uncovered the presence and necessity of ongoing inputs during movement, which may lessen the need for careful initialization. Here, we modeled the motor cortex as an input-driven dynamical system, and we asked what the optimal way to control this system to perform fast delayed reaches is. We find that delay-period inputs consistently arise in an optimally controlled model of M1. By studying a variety of network architectures, we could dissect and predict the situations in which it is beneficial for a network to prepare. Finally, we show that optimal input-driven control of neural dynamics gives rise to multiple phases of preparation during reach sequences, providing a novel explanation for experimentally observed features of monkey M1 activity in double reaching.
-
- Neuroscience
Humans make irrational decisions in the presence of irrelevant distractor options. There is little consensus on whether decision making is facilitated or impaired by the presence of a highly rewarding distractor, or whether the distractor effect operates at the level of options’ component attributes rather than at the level of their overall value. To reconcile different claims, we argue that it is important to consider the diversity of people’s styles of decision making and whether choice attributes are combined in an additive or multiplicative way. Employing a multi-laboratory dataset investigating the same experimental paradigm, we demonstrated that people used a mix of both approaches and the extent to which approach was used varied across individuals. Critically, we identified that this variability was correlated with the distractor effect during decision making. Individuals who tended to use a multiplicative approach to compute value, showed a positive distractor effect. In contrast, a negative distractor effect (divisive normalisation) was prominent in individuals tending towards an additive approach. Findings suggest that the distractor effect is related to how value is constructed, which in turn may be influenced by task and subject specificities. This concurs with recent behavioural and neuroscience findings that multiple distractor effects co-exist.
